dark light

Srbin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 1,678 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian attack capabilities #2051324
    Srbin
    Participant

    So, then how will the missile boat commander track a destroyer at 130kms to fire his Kh-35? Or even 160kms to fire his NSM?

    in reply to: RNZAF – no armed planes ? #2628435
    Srbin
    Participant

    Yes of course, spotting and thats what its best at, a single Global Hawk can cover A LOT of water, and with its 60h+ endurance, you could have 2 Global Hawks flying around NZ at any time non stop patrolling. In SAR, it would locate the target, and helicopters or other aircraft would go to it to rescue it.

    As for attack, there is the Mariner UAV which is the Maritime Patrol version of Predator B, it could very welll be armed with Hellfires, Harpoons, NSMs or whatever you wish probably.

    I think something like hte PC-9 armed with Hellfires/Trigat-LRs ATGMs, Mistrals/Stingers, maybe NSMs and such.

    in reply to: Russian attack capabilities #2051335
    Srbin
    Participant

    Remember that targetting issue though!. Missile boats dont carry big missiles and helicopters its one or the other!. Without organic aviation for OTH targetting the missile boat has little guarantee of being able to detect a target 250-300km away!.

    Targeting? The same way anyone plans to use weapons like the Yakhont or Klub. How do the Indians plan to target something 220 kms away with their Kilo? So how will a Skjold with 8 NSMs target targets 160kms away? There are a lot of ways of targeting a large destroyer and such from 300kms away.

    in reply to: Build an Airforce Scenario: Bosnia #2628438
    Srbin
    Participant

    When speaking of this issue, more questions come to my attention: According to http://www.aimpress.org, at least one of the four Bosnian Serb jets which were downed in 1994 was manned by a Serb (Montenegrin) pilot, lt. Pesic from Podgorica (KIA). Belgrade denied that Serb military personnel took part in operations in Bosnia, and Serbia was never officially at war during that period. Were these people mercenaries, or did the regime in Belgrade support the Bosnian Serb faction by providing personnel?

    Ohhh Belgrade and Podgorica were definitely involved in the War. I think it was up till mid 1992 I am not sure the exact date, but Milosevic controlled everything before Serbs were sopposed to take Sarajevo. The Muslims were getting weaker and were about to loose Sarajevo totally and a new offensive was to be launched to take it, however Milosevic got a call from Clinton to tell him to cancel it and he did. Since then the Serbs in Bosnia were never under Milosevic’s control ever again and never listened to him. He did continue to provide Karadjic and Mladic with weapons and soldiers and such. SCG were definitely involved, and so was Croatia.

    in reply to: To SMT or not to SMT ? that is "the question" #2628442
    Srbin
    Participant

    Well, imho more F-16s + MLU/ACE(Israel) would be a much cheaper and better option for the AF itself, but I dont think Venezuela wants to actually rely on US anymore so they will go shopping elsewhere like Russia. If anything, why not wire a F-16 with a Zhuk-M radar of the Mig-29SMT if the Mig-29SMT is purchased?

    in reply to: F-18B/D vs MiG-29M2 #2628565
    Srbin
    Participant

    The Gripen is a rather small aircraft with pretty low thurst, aircraft similar to it like the FC-1 and A-50 with similar weights and thrust and such should be able to do about as much as the Gripen. The A-50 has similar weights and such to the Gripen but it’s lighter. According to various sites, the A-50 cannot do more than 4500kg, and the FC-1 is rated at some 3800kg, probably due to it’s metallic airframe and is not made out of composites like the Gripen or A-50, but the point still is that even 5000kg for Gripen may be a little too much.

    in reply to: Boeing X-32, "Monica" #2628589
    Srbin
    Participant

    Maybe not, fighter fleet by 7%, not cut other military programmes.

    in reply to: Malaysia agrees to buy KS-1A #2051341
    Srbin
    Participant

    SAMP/Aster 30

    This is more of a long range SAM than a medium one, or more like in between. It has a range of some 100km. Twice as more than the other competitors. While it’s range is smaller than that of 150km Patriot or 200km S300PMU2

    in reply to: Russian attack capabilities #2051342
    Srbin
    Participant

    What missile is that? Its either the Moskit or Yakhont, and to me it looks neither like the two,

    in reply to: F-18B/D vs MiG-29M2 #2628607
    Srbin
    Participant

    I am sorry, but I HIGHLY doubt the Gripen can take off with a payload of 6350kg(14000pounds), thats just bunch of crap. It’s payload AT best is 5000kg, and probably not even that much.

    in reply to: Russian attack capabilities #2051345
    Srbin
    Participant

    Anyways, the NSM is better than the Harpoon, Kh-35 or Exocet but however those latter 3 are no slouches either. There is going to be a much longer ranged 180km version of Exocet, and Harpoon will probably be furtherly developed too. The Kh-35 I think is being developed into the Kh-35E1 with 250km range. These are all around missiles that can be installed on ships, coastal batteries, aircraft, helicopters and etc.

    However, if there is something like a medium sized Missile Boat, I would rather have it armed with like 4 220 km Klubs than 8 160km NSMs or 8 130km Urans or 8 125km Harpoons or whatever. I will have obviously less armament, but I could easily stay at a much greater distance and the Klub will probably have a much greater chance of hitting any sort of larger ship than anything smaller would. The closer I get, the bigger chance there is that something will destroy me.

    Same with a larger aircraft like the Su-30M, I would rather arm it with like 3 Alfas than with like 8 Kh-35s, because the Alfas will certainly have a much easier time hitting something and sinking it. I can also fire it at a shorter range.

    in reply to: RNZAF – no armed planes ? #2628648
    Srbin
    Participant

    My point is that rather than have no armed aircraft, wouldn’t it be better for them to have an (armable!) aircraft like the PC-9M (as operated by the Irish Air Corps, amongst others) ?

    Thats about it, and armed with Mistrals, Rockets, Machine Guns, possibly LGBs and some light AshMs like the NSM(it weighs 300kg, I am sure PC-9 would be able to carry at least 2, and would require offboard targeting) and such.

    Though, how does New Zealand conduct their Air Policing?

    in reply to: Boeing X-32, "Monica" #2628657
    Srbin
    Participant

    Why would they do this when they can probably build their own design now. They built the F-1 before, then they copied the F-2 from teh F-16, I think they can take off on their own.

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2628939
    Srbin
    Participant

    While the Buffalo did perform poorly early in the Pacific War and was withdrawn from the frontline, the overall combat record of this pudgy little fighter was actually phenomenal.

    Forty-three Buffaloes were flown by the Finnish LLv24 Squadron. The kill ratio of the buffalo versus Soviet planes under the Finns is estimated at around 30 to one! (1) No fewer than 12 Finns became aces in Buffalos.

    Compare the aircraft it faced in the Pacific and then compare it to the aircraft it faced over Finland and Soviet Union

    Another one
    -Morocco has F-16s
    False, never got any

    -R-33 is copied from the defected F-14 from Iran
    False, R-33 came into service before the 1979 Revolution, nor any F-14s defected.

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2628942
    Srbin
    Participant

    …Absolutely false. Go research Iranian Tomcat use during the Iran-Iraq War. Granted, a lot of this has to do with the inferior SOviet equipment (to include RWR gear) used by the Iraqi AF, but nevertheless the AIM-54 did score numerous kills against Iraqi aircraft, to include a large number of fighters.

    Mirage F1s were blown out of the skys too, all Iraqi aircraft had poor RWRs.

    -F-117 shot down over Serbia was detected by and shot down by a Mig-29
    False, it was shot down by a SAM

    -J-8B… is a copy of Mig-23/Su-15
    False, it was further redesignation of the J-8A which itself is a larger Mig-21/J-7. J-8’s intakes and such were influenced by the Mig-23/Su-15, but not copied

    -LCA is a copy of Mirage-2000
    False

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 1,678 total)