It’s not how much money you throw, but how you throw it and how it’s used.
You can spend all that money on better education for all kinds of books, paper, supplies, extra schools and other crap but the fact is that still won’t improve your education when you are learning stuff in gr12 that the Europeans learn in gr9
Yahh Bug Lover, it’s vg drawing and the plane is vg but I think it’s a little too small, only if none of the weapons are carried internally.
I also like the Gavin’s plane he posted but it too is a little small, it’s rather short and it’s fuselage is small so I doubt it’d have much space anywhere. It’s a nice VTOL design but I could probably easily put a vertical turbofan behind the cockpit for my design to make it VTOL.
Man that’s one really heavy upgrade for the SMT and the III especially if it goes ahead.
why are people discussing Russian and NATO pilots, this is a discussion about Mig-29SMT vs F-18C/D
Yak-130 could serve as a multirole fighter, in terms of air defence, it’s performance is not bad and could certainly get newer engines and more fuel by extending the fuselage.
it’s their indignous project, the Azarkhsh, Azarkhsh II, Sa’eqeh 80 and Shafaqh
srbin,
your design does not hide the IR sig very well. Gavin O’s design does that by hiding it somewhat by using tails behind the engine (it helps a little)
also the fuselage is flat. it cannot be that way. it would need to be area ruled etc. that tailess design would require a brilliant FBW to control it.
You know, I just noticed that in the design Gavin posted, the IR signature is no hid well because as it seems thats a VTOL plane and it’s engine nozzle points down for take off like F-35’s so therefore it’s not hid that well behind the vertical tails.
Yahh I have to agree with aerospacetech, the Kaveri’s specs are not much better than RD-33’s, if I am not mistaken the thurst of Kaveri is lower than that of RD-33, but a light fighter like LCA doesn’t need such a strong engine.
Kaveri would also give India significant knowledge in engine technology.
I like the fighter-bomber one, hook it up with a decent radar, BVR weapons and all kinds of Russian A2G weaps.
Could be a good competition to F-50, FC-1 and LCA
yahh Erez, to me it looks like a Gripen really.
overscan, you gona make a drawing of your own based on those requirements?
overscan, in what way don’t it match so I can correct it.
Hmm, the canards offered no advantage? I mean they would be needed for LCA for extra lift and especially to be used as speed brakes.
The problem with the Euro jets is that a lot of the market for high tech fighters has dried up.
The Middle East was a huge importer of Western aircraft from the 1960’s onwards, be it Lightnings, Hunters or Mirages.
But many of these have become tied to the USA (e.g Kuwait, Saudi Arabia) while others such as Libya and Iraq no longer have the funding for such equipment.
Furthermore Western aircraft are too complicated and too expensive to be operated by many third world operators.
Asian nations are acquiring Russian, US or indigenous hardware, and Asia has never been a large market for European fighters.
Finally many airforces in Europe are reducing or even scrapping their fast jet fleets. Belgium will in the future only have about 60 fighters, Germany only 260 (if they’re lucky), while Eastern European airforces have virtually disappeared as large importers of aircraft.
Realistically the bulk of the world needs fighters in the catagory of the FC-1 or JF-17, not expensive Eurocanards.
I totally agree, but the large Flankers are sure making good sales around the World.
I don’t know, but the French Rafale is just wayy too overpriced like the Typhoon, remember that the cost of Rafale impends on the 300 Rafales France is planning to order, the cost of Typhoon is impending on the 600+ Typhoons European nations are planning to order, yet the cost of F-35 is impending on 3000+- orders impending from US and Britain.
I don’t know but the Rafale to me is probably the cheapest out there if it was impending on 3000 orders like JSF is and if Typhoon was.
I think cheap and light multirole fighters are the way to go in the future, aka FC-1 and LCA and J-10 and other jets.
Cold War is long gone.
srbin,
your design does not hide the IR sig very well. Gavin O’s design does that by hiding it somewhat by using tails behind the engine (it helps a little)
also the fuselage is flat. it cannot be that way. it would need to be area ruled etc. that tailess design would require a brilliant FBW to control it.
I think I can hide the engine deeper in a bit into the fuselage although it won’t do much regarding IR. Also I am starting to consider adding a single or twin tails to it, because without them like you said it would require some very advanced FBW because this thing would be super unstable.
As for my design, as you can see it’s like a mini F-22/F-23, with F-23’s delta wing and F-22’s style fuselage. This design, I optimized it for very high speed maneouverability, diamond wing and far coupled canards and clean aerodynamic properties should allow high cruising speed with a strong engine. I’d say that it’s maximum cruising speed should not be below m1.7-1.8 with AAMs(internally) and full internal fuel load.
Here it is just adjusted a bit
I think it’s better for us to know because we want to discuss it but it’s always better to keep it secret because when you go up against your enemy, they won’t know anything about your weapons.