dark light

Srbin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,186 through 1,200 (of 1,678 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vietnamese Su-30s?? #2690483
    Srbin
    Participant

    truong, the Flanker has the necessary range to get wherever Vietnam needs to get it to(Spartleys and other places) but remember the Mig-21 doesn’t have the range to do it, so replacing Mig-21 and Su-22s and other aircraft with FC-1 or even LCA would make sense.

    I think LCA or FC-1 would be perfect to replace the hordes of Mig-21s, I mean there is nothing in Russia’s or Europe’s inventory thats cheap and light enough to replace the Mig-21s, this is where LCA and FC-1 come into play.

    It all depends where Vietnam wants to play it’s cards, either India or China.

    in reply to: Damn… There goes that FC-1 competition again… #2691047
    Srbin
    Participant

    I swear I am sick of all these FC-1 and LCA discussions, people need to just drop it because everyone is just sick of it. I don’t care of they’re not flaming, it’s just really getting boring.

    Could we all post threads on some different aircraft?

    in reply to: Vietnamese Su-30s?? #2691050
    Srbin
    Participant

    I swear I hate all these people who hate all these countries that bitch about all kinds of aircraft and their capabilities?

    I would generally be curious to know why you even wrote that, but that would give you an excuse to ramble on more about who knows what?

    lol, anyways I’ll tell you

    Cry me a river?

    We have no MiG-29s to upgrade so that does not even belong on the thread?

    Just a point I was making, how many countries out there have all kinds of early factory planes that they never bother upgrading, prime examples are all the Mig-29 users pretty much

    You?re one of those guys who really should not offer opinions on threads and just stick to asking questions. Had you asked a question and not made a statement ending with a question mark already having make an assumption it would not have looked so bad?You maybe should have asked if the VPAF is planning to upgrade the Flankers and not why they are not…

    Vietnam does plan to upgrade the Su-27SK/UBKs to the Su-27SMK model and has on order already 4 Su-30MKs with a total plan for 24 Su-30MKs (similar to the Chinese model). So there is a plan to upgrade these planes and get more.

    So other then showing a knack for very opinionatedly responding to topics with out knowing much you don?t offer much in the way of anything else?

    To edit my last post before this one I am very sure VPAF Flankers could also make use of unguided free flight rockets as well?

    It was a question, lol

    I don’t see why it wouldn’t be better to upgrade the Su-27s to the SMK, I mean why buy a different plane for different missions when you can upgrade your existing one to do the same missions(now that was a statement).

    in reply to: Vietnamese Su-30s?? #2691086
    Srbin
    Participant

    I swear I hate all these countries that bitch about all kinds of aircraft and their capabilities when they don’t upgrade them with newer avionics and weapons. Prime examples are all the Mig-29 users which still use the 1980s Mig-29s instead of upgrading them.

    Why doesn’t just Vietnam upgrade it’s Su-27s the same way Russians are?

    in reply to: Has Rafale become an abyss for billions? #2691107
    Srbin
    Participant

    The French have been going down a single engined light multirole fighter pretty much since MIII yet now they switch to a medium twin engined Rafale, I wonder why? If they stuck with a single engined smaller Rafale with less performance, I am sure Rafale would’ve had much better export orders.

    It’s too expensive of a beast just like the Typhoon.

    in reply to: Vietnamese Su-30s?? #2691126
    Srbin
    Participant

    “Maybe they should look at MiG-29M1/M2. I cannot emphasize enough how much I hope for the success of this aircraft.”

    Would be a waste of money. First off the MiG-29M1/M2 are not cheap and do not offer much over the longer ranged Flankers. The Flanker has what we need, range and payload. Vietnam is not a small nation and the Air Force need planes with a good unrefueled range and payload to operate near the Spratlys as a show of force if need be.

    I think more Su-27SKs and Su-30MKs are what the air force needs…

    Well for once I agree with truong, besides VPAF needs something better than Mig-29M1/M2 to match hordes of Malaysian, Chinese, Indonesian and Singaporean fighters.

    Truong, what kind of anti-shipping missiles do VPAF’s Flanker’s carry?

    in reply to: Light Weight Fighter Requirement #2691217
    Srbin
    Participant

    can anyone come up with their own design please? Everyone seems to just copy and paste pictures from other proposals and concepts designed by others.

    Srbin
    Participant

    The biggesy problem I see with the Gripen is yes the American components, and no not the weapons because you can easily hook it up with many other different weapons like European or French or Israeli but the problem with Gripen-As is that they use an American engine. If they can find a suitable European engine then it would be good.

    in reply to: Light Weight Fighter Requirement #2691241
    Srbin
    Participant

    Not bad but can that thing do short take offs and landings and it will probably be pretty draggy

    in reply to: Single Engine v. Two Engines #2691333
    Srbin
    Participant

    I see Mig-29’s maintenance record as the biggest flaw of the early Mig-29s, but if countries like Hungary, Romania and Bangladesh keep bitching about the maintenance of the early Mig-29s, why don’t they think about upgrading them to SMT which is sopposed to heavily decrease the operation costs, if they won’t then they should stop bitching.

    Most of the F-16 users out there have upgraded their F-16s yet most of the Mig-29 users have not.

    in reply to: Need info and pics on Arye #2691337
    Srbin
    Participant

    Erez, I PMed you.

    in reply to: Light Weight Fighter Requirement #2691339
    Srbin
    Participant

    That’s why I made the fuselage so damn wide, for space for internal fuel. Although in width(wingspan) and length it is similar to the Gripen and LCA, it is actually much heavier. I could make it even longer to accomodate more fuel but that would just be pushing the weight. Also don’t forget that it’s not a very draggy design and that would increase range.

    in reply to: Vietnamese Su-30s?? #2691345
    Srbin
    Participant

    Yes as it seems they will upgrade their Mig-21s either in Israel or India if my memory serves me right to serve for some more time until a different solution is found.

    As for the Mig-29, I am not sure, for the numbers Vietnam needs them for, the Mig-29 even the M1/M2 are still a little too expensive to run so I don’t see a point in Mig-29/Su-27 combo.

    If Vietnam does get friendlier with China in the future I think they may purchase something from them, if you look at them both China and Vietnam, they seem to be going down the same road in the future.

    I too think that it would be better to develop better Anti-Shipping capabilities rather than heavily modernize their Navy which would be much more expensive.

    in reply to: Light Weight Fighter Requirement #2691368
    Srbin
    Participant

    ok then post it and lets see.

    in reply to: Light Weight Fighter Requirement #2691376
    Srbin
    Participant

    If you actually look closely at my design, look at the front, it’s bubble canopy and intakes and the nose is pretty much the same as of F-22. Also I think this thing would be able to supercruise way more than m1.5, I mean it has a very powerful engine, something like 35,000lb class like F-35’s yet it’s much more aerodynamically cleaner and smoother and smaller and lighter. It should be able to supercruise at minimum of m1.8 I’d say.

    You should scale down yours and refine it and post it.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,186 through 1,200 (of 1,678 total)