dark light

Srbin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 1,678 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vietnamese Su-30s?? #2691786
    Srbin
    Participant

    As it seems to me, Vietnam has been buying alot of similar things as China has.

    in reply to: Chile enhances forces #2692431
    Srbin
    Participant

    I think it was 10 F-16s only that they bought, and it was for 700mn.

    Anyways, I think this is a solution to integrate Israeli BVRAAMs because US would only give Chile AIM-120 like they would to anyone, they would be bought by the country, stored in US and only given to them when needed, I know it’s a **** deal thats why Chile is doing this.

    in reply to: V-44 #2692437
    Srbin
    Participant

    Not only the V-22 isn’t really done with the testing after 17 years, it’s not even a proved design, so before this program even commences the Osprey should be at least in service.

    Now I totally agree with Arthur, there is no need for this.

    Not only this would make this plane super expensive it will also probably make it a maintenance nightmare and it probably wouldn’t offer even a average performance of a fixed wing aircraft like C-130.

    US should just go along with the route the Europeans did with A400M and the Russia and Ukranians did with An-70.

    in reply to: Best Attack Helicopters #2693229
    Srbin
    Participant

    It all depends on what and how you are attacking. If yu are sneaking up on something, and need to blow them up from a distance, at night, then the Apache is perfect. It’s amazing how they can sneak up on you. At the last Airshow I went to, held at a local International Airport, one of the local Nat. Guard Apache pilots did a demo for everyone. He takes off, and flies out of view. They had some other demo, time passes, people forget. They announce the apache demo is beginning. Out of nowhere, just a FEW hundred feet from the other side of the runway, they apache popps out of the trees, just 50 feet off the ground. Everybody couldn’t believe it. this guy had snaked in and out of the trees around the airport, and ended up RIGHT in front of the crowd. HE did some really neat N.O.T.E. demos, using the surrounding forest to show the manuerability of the apache. While it is a SLOW chopper, it is EXTREMELY manuverable, dodging and weaving.
    The longbow can seriously wipe out huge numbers of targets very quickly witht he radar-ATGM’s. It can take a lot of damage, for a helicopter. When that first was shot down, nearly all of them were hit by heavy fire. The fact that they weren’t “Ready to go” the next day is not the issue. The fact that the helicopters were shot to heck and MADE IT BACK so they COULD BE REPAIRED is what matters.

    for an all-out WAR, when you need something to sneak up and kill things–BIG things, Apache is an awesome weapon, and has proven itself many times.

    for an Urban conflict, where the helicopter is going to do pinpoint strikes, or cover ground forces, the Apache is out of its element. It is made to fly nap of the earth in order to hide from the enemy. Flying N.O.T.E. over a city is, in hindsight, and unbeliveably asssinine idea. Flying low is to HIDE, flying low over a CITY does ANYTHING but hide you!!!

    In this case, the Cobra is a better choice. It canot take the punishment of the apache, but in it’s intended role, the Cobra doesn’t have to. The old vietnam style strikes are what you need in this case, and the Cobra does it just fine.

    For a fight when HEAVY firepower is needed, and a stealth, N.O.T.E. is not possible–Too open, cities, etc. The sbility to take a hit is important, as is speed. The cobra has speed, but not armor, the apache has armor and manuverability, but not speed. It seems the Russian AH’s have this combination, and would be a much better Il-2 type aircraft.

    I think that the closest thing the US has to that is the A-10.

    But that’s just in an airshow and you don’t know how others would perform the same way.

    in reply to: PAK FA Thread #2693984
    Srbin
    Participant

    As it seems the only explanation why India would be financing the MCA project is because
    1)PAK-FA along with J-XX are way ahead of MCA in development
    2)Probably the biggest explanation is the development time, India has learned how long LCA took to develop, project started in 1983 and LCA will not be in mass production till 2009 probably, which is something like 26 years, that is why they fear that if MCA does take forever like LCA did then they can rely on PAK-FA, which should be technologically and performance wise better than either MCA or J-XX due to Russian aerodyanmic and technoligical superiorty. Meanwhile the Chinese seem to have much more faith in their J-XX project.

    in reply to: PAK FA Thread #2694122
    Srbin
    Participant

    Also do we have any clue what kind of radar this bird would be carrying? Will it be some existing radars like N011M or anything like that or something new?

    Is Russia developing an AESA?

    in reply to: Best Attack Helicopters #2694125
    Srbin
    Participant

    Well as it seems US Army used bad tactics in Iraq because Marines didn’t seem to loose a single Cobra, but maybe it’s not just the tactics maybe it could be the helicopter too.

    Apache is very costly, 35mn to buy, somewhere around that and it’s probbaly the most expensive attack helicopter around, it costs as much as an F-16 to maintain, like Vympel said, it is a hangar queen and is very hard and expensive to maintain.

    I think I too would go for Mi-28N, it seems to be able to take on the pounding, seems pretty manouverable, good weapon systems and sensors.

    As for Cobra, I don’t know it’s very old and I’d rather go for something much newer.

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum Questions #2694782
    Srbin
    Participant

    Wow so sad that such a good bird not only has a bad loosing record due to being in pretty ovewhelming conditions it is being screwed by RuAF now that Su-27 has been given priority.

    They should’ve upgraded at least a third of the Mig-29s so SMT is in service with someone.

    in reply to: Best Attack Helicopters #2694786
    Srbin
    Participant

    I am not sure about the Apache, but it’s very slow and not very manouverable, we’ve seen how it performed in Iraq, out of 33 hits only 3 were in mission ready status the next day, the rest were either shot down, written off or need heavy repair.

    As I see with Ka-52 and Mi-28N, Ka-52 seems to be more manouverable and faster, yet Mi-28N seems to be able to pack more firepower and is much more armoured.

    Also Ka-52 and Mi-28N are twice as cheaper than the Longbow.

    in reply to: PAK FA Thread #2694953
    Srbin
    Participant

    Many speculate that the PAK-FA will be developed from the existing S-37 with a conventional wing

    here’s some speculated pics

    http://veiculosmilitares.vila.bol.com.br/2003/pakfa2.JPG
    http://veiculosmilitares.vila.bol.com.br/2003/PAK-FA2.JPG

    in reply to: Su-34 #2694961
    Srbin
    Participant

    How much would Russia charge for the heavily upraded Su-39? I know the Scorpion upgrade costs about 10mn from Georgia!

    in reply to: PAK FA Thread #2694964
    Srbin
    Participant

    It’s weird that we have not seen a single picture of the PAK-FA concept, Sukhoi was due to submitt a rough drawing of the PAK-FA to the Russian Gov’t way back in January yet we have not seen it so therefore we have NO clue what PAK-FA will look like

    Can we gather what we know? So far we can assume
    -it will be able to supercruise
    -will have STOL
    -will be twin engined
    -will carry R-73 and R-77 and probably KS-172(Maybe R-27s)
    -will probably carry wide variety of Russian ASMs
    -should be manouverable as stated by Sukhoi

    What we don’t know exactly as it seems:
    -we are not sure about the engine, Sukhoi announced it will not be AL-41 but some new engine
    -avionics and radar

    in reply to: Su-34 #2695024
    Srbin
    Participant

    Well Vympel I know that the SU-34 is a little too expensive but the thing is it will be bought anyways in larger numbers probably, so why not fit it with a CAS role? You can replace Su-25 in CAS with a totally new aircraft or you can just use the Su-34 to do it’s job along with strike and anti shipping and other things.

    It would require to fit new weapons on Su-34 and train pilots for CAS but it would be MUCH cheaper to do this than to buy a whole new and different plane.

    Russia doesn’t have the money like it did during the cold war.

    in reply to: N-014 projected Radar for MFI #2695189
    Srbin
    Participant

    Well an E-3’s radar is like 3 times more powerful than F-22’s so yes F-22 might not exactly need it but you must not forget how American pilots don’t do well without AWACS, latest being the exercise with IAF where there was no AWACS and the F-15 pilots did pretty bad.

    in reply to: Su-34 #2695206
    Srbin
    Participant

    Originally posted by Vympel
    Su-34 is a bit excessive for the CAS role; all those expensive uber-avionics- it’s more suited to deep strike. You want CAS, use the Su-39.

    Of course, the Su-34 could be a nice deep-strike tank killer if it used weapons like Brimstone or the new US “Joint Common Missile” (more imaginative name pending, no doubt)

    http://www.raytheon.com/products/jcm/

    Well by the time Su-25 and other versions are retired Su-34 should be entering service, so therefore instead of making a whole new aircraft to relace the Frogfoots, use the Su-34 as a CAS aircraft, I mean let it use all that armor 😛

    I think intergration of some sort of anti tank missile like Super Vikhr would be easy right?(or the newest anti tank missile with humongous range)

    I don’t see whu Su-34 cannot become the best CAS aircraft in the World 😛

    It can already perform

    Deep Strike-will carry all kinds of weapons and etc
    Anti Shipping-probably have the best anti shipping capabilities in the world by carrying the Yakhnot-M
    Limited Air Defence/Interception-with necessary avionics and weapons like R-73 and R-77

    It should perform
    CAS-mount some Anti Tank weapons on it and other things to replace Frogfoots in RuAF

    I think Su-34 can replace Tu-22M if it’s Anti Shipping capabilities are good, I know it’s range or payload isn’t as great as Backfire’s is, but Russia has no other option but to upgrade the Tu-22Ms but they cannot last forever.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 1,678 total)