dark light

Skymonster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 1,877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: COA to start 2nd daily service from MAN #746925
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Good luck to CO – they’ve found a niche in the UK-US market (just like EK have done to the Gulf and beyond) and are really beginning to exploit it. Connection opportunities will be increased and there will be less need to wait around at EWR once the two services get up and running. The different timings will each work better for some pax.

    Having just experienced a CO 757 BHX-EWR and return (outbound was 100% loaded, return about 90%), I don’t find the 757 to be a problem as a trans-Atlantic airplane, although I have just a couple of minor reservations:

    1. Boarding and deboarding takes ages due the single aisle
    2. I prefer the 2 seats by the window on 767s and most 777s – climbing over two others to get to the aisle in flight is a pain (the three by the window is why I avoid 747s if I can too though!)

    A

    in reply to: COA to start 2nd daily service from MAN #759465
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Good luck to CO – they’ve found a niche in the UK-US market (just like EK have done to the Gulf and beyond) and are really beginning to exploit it. Connection opportunities will be increased and there will be less need to wait around at EWR once the two services get up and running. The different timings will each work better for some pax.

    Having just experienced a CO 757 BHX-EWR and return (outbound was 100% loaded, return about 90%), I don’t find the 757 to be a problem as a trans-Atlantic airplane, although I have just a couple of minor reservations:

    1. Boarding and deboarding takes ages due the single aisle
    2. I prefer the 2 seats by the window on 767s and most 777s – climbing over two others to get to the aisle in flight is a pain (the three by the window is why I avoid 747s if I can too though!)

    A

    in reply to: bmi Longhaul Fleet changes #746929
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Worst thing IMHO about a 757 trans-Atlantic is the time it takes to do the boarding / deboarding – with many passengers having large carry-ons, limited bin sizes, and only one aisle (this being the biggest issue), it seems to take an age.

    in reply to: bmi Longhaul Fleet changes #759468
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Worst thing IMHO about a 757 trans-Atlantic is the time it takes to do the boarding / deboarding – with many passengers having large carry-ons, limited bin sizes, and only one aisle (this being the biggest issue), it seems to take an age.

    in reply to: bmi Longhaul Fleet changes #746939
    Skymonster
    Participant

    IMHO, the problem is not so much putting a 757 into the market (I’ve just litterally got back today from EWR on a CO 757 and it wasn’t too bad an experience), but managing passenger expectations if it doesn’t have seat back PTVs and for some reason they can’t offer the full BMI service. Having flown Icelandair too, they don’t have seat-back entertainment so to keep their standard of service BMI would have to have the interior pretty significantly reworked. Furthermore, Icelandair’s business class seats are no where near as good as BMI’s “The Business” seats, there’s no enhanced economy, and Icelandair’s economy pitch is pretty ropey, so again an interior refit should really be needed. If they don’t do that and put a 757 onto the route in Icelandair configuration, I think that they will seriously damage their reputation – I know, having flown BMI to Washington quite a number of times in all their classes, that there’s no way I’d fly them again in any class if they put a normally configured Icelandair 757 onto the route.

    Andy

    in reply to: bmi Longhaul Fleet changes #759471
    Skymonster
    Participant

    IMHO, the problem is not so much putting a 757 into the market (I’ve just litterally got back today from EWR on a CO 757 and it wasn’t too bad an experience), but managing passenger expectations if it doesn’t have seat back PTVs and for some reason they can’t offer the full BMI service. Having flown Icelandair too, they don’t have seat-back entertainment so to keep their standard of service BMI would have to have the interior pretty significantly reworked. Furthermore, Icelandair’s business class seats are no where near as good as BMI’s “The Business” seats, there’s no enhanced economy, and Icelandair’s economy pitch is pretty ropey, so again an interior refit should really be needed. If they don’t do that and put a 757 onto the route in Icelandair configuration, I think that they will seriously damage their reputation – I know, having flown BMI to Washington quite a number of times in all their classes, that there’s no way I’d fly them again in any class if they put a normally configured Icelandair 757 onto the route.

    Andy

    in reply to: Ren's model feast thread ! #235647
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Next is a new livery KLM 737-800 by Dragon Wings

    No way that’s an -800! It doesn’t have two overwing exits. It looks more like a -300 to me.

    Andy

    PS: Also got the Scando DC-9, card number 2! 🙂

    in reply to: LPL-IOM-LPL on 3W #424237
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Nice report… I hope that the airline adjusted the pax weight allowance for all the rugby players on board – this sort of thing has caused more than one or two problems with weight and balance in the past!

    Andy

    in reply to: A Flight On A Womble – MXP-BHX on Alitalia #424238
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Thanks for all the positive comments guy – much appreciate it!

    Interesting to compare the ERJ 170 to the A319 and A320 which I flew in October last year.

    My opinion, the ERJ.170 is better than the CRJ.200 and CRJ.700 (the latter of a similar capacity) as it feels more like a large airliner even though its only 2+2 across – it definitely feels less cramped than the CRJ. But as to comparing it with an A320/319… Actually, aside from being 2+2 its not bad, as its much more like a real airliner than the CRJs and smaller ERJ.145s, but even though it feels bigger than those regionals it still isn’t quite a full narrow body!

    Andy

    in reply to: A Flight On A Womble – MXP-BHX on Alitalia #424347
    Skymonster
    Participant

    One of the guys at our Scottish based club has an N registered a/c, I’ll have to ask him why that is. It used to have a UK reg.

    1. Less onerous, read potentially cheaper, airworthiness requirements (as long as you have access to a US licenced engineer to do the inspections)
    2. He may well have an FAA Licence with an Instrument Rating (much cheaper/easier to acquire than a JAA IR), and the N-reg will allow him to use his US IR in the UK, which he couldn’t do flying a UK reg’d aircraft

    Andy

    in reply to: A Flight On A Womble – MXP-BHX on Alitalia #424364
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Didn’t know that! Do you know why they are Irish registered?

    To start to answer that question, you might want to read this recent thread on PPRuNe:

    http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?threadid=157856

    Not sure which answer is correct though! 😮

    Andy

    in reply to: A Flight On A Womble – MXP-BHX on Alitalia #424388
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Do the Embraer’s have an Irish Reg?

    All the Alitalia ERJ-145s are Italian registered, but all of the ERJ-170s are Irish registered.

    Andy

    in reply to: A Flight On A Womble – MXP-BHX on Alitalia #424413
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Will there be any photos from the flight to follow?

    Sadly, no. 🙁 A two day trip, a lap top, work documents, overnight gear, a camera and a desire not to check hold-baggage do not make happy travelling companions, so the camera found itself grounded on this occasion! 😮

    I did “lift” the safety card though, but that’s allocated to a friend who is an avid collector of such items! 😮

    Andy

    in reply to: Ren's model feast thread ! #236759
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Yet another airport scene – this time somewhere in Europe in the mid-80s:
    http://www.andymartin.btinternet.co.uk/Airport3.jpg

    Models are:
    1:400 Dragon Wings Air Canada 747-100 (Singapore ’85)
    1:400 Soveriegn Ghana Airways DC-10-30
    1:400 Aeroclassics Iberia 727-200
    1:400 Seattle Model Aircraft Company British Midland DC-9-30
    1:400 Gemini Jets Trans World 747SP
    1:400 Jet-X Pan Am TriStar 500
    1:400 Gemini Jets British Airways DC-10-30

    Andy

    in reply to: Ren's model feast thread ! #236886
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Air freight operations…
    http://www.andymartin.btinternet.co.uk/Airport2.jpg
    Andy

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 1,877 total)