dark light

Skymonster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Child takes over JFK control tower #580418
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Its still lives and aeroplanes potentially at risk, whether a 5-flights-a-day GA aerodrome or a major commercial airport. A mistaken instruction followed by an r/t failure – such minor failures, linked together in a chain, are the stuff of potential major accidents.

    Remember the Aeroflot A310 that crashed some years back after the pilot put their kids in the front-seats during the cruise? And we all agreed the pilot’s actions were to blame. This is the ATC equivalent, although thank God it didn’t end up causing an accident.

    Maybe you think it was a rant – I don’t. Within the constraints of the pilot always having the final say (which is good, but the pilot often needs ATC to see the entire picture), I am to an extent putting my life in the hands of ATC everytime I fly as either a passenger, or when I’m flying as a pilot. When I’m flying, I absolutely do not want ATC’s responsibilities to be delegated to an untrained child under ANY circumstances.

    Andy

    in reply to: Child takes over JFK control tower #580424
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Huh? When I fly into a “small GA airfield” with ATC, I want to be sure that the guy or gal on the other end of the RT is as competent as the guy at our home base at EMA. Whilst the pilot ALWAYS has the ultimate rsponsibility for safety, if I’m meant to be following ATC instructions I want to know that they are considered and issued by a 100% competent authority, appropriately trained, qualified, licenced and in current practice.

    Next time you fly, think about a child giving instructions to the aeroplane you’re sat in. Think about what’d happen if, despite being told what to say, the child said the wrong thing, and then before it was corrected there was an r/t failure. If you ever listen to ATC, think about listening to pilots in training who, having been told what to say by their instructor, as still hesitant and mix things up. And then think about how you’d feel about that happening when you’re sitting in a 747 with 400 other people. And with the spurious ATC transmissions from unauthorised sources that have happened in the past, how does a pilot tell that this child is genuinely passing on instructions from a real controller?

    This is potentially lives at stake (whether at a “small GA airport” or a major airport like JFK), and millions of dollars worth of equipment in the firing line. It absolutely horrifies me that anyone would allow such a thing to happen. What was that guy thinking putting a kid on the mike? I don’t care if the kid was “supervised”. Anyone in ATC who did that, I would very seriously question their judgement and competence to be an air traffic controller, and I’d certainly have a significantly reduced confidence in the reliability of any instructions that the guy gave to me himself, let alone those from a child. The guy(s) who allowed this to happen should be fired, and potentially brought up on a charge of willfully endangering aeroplanes too.

    Andy

    in reply to: Ryanair passenger eats winning scratch card! #580429
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Still insulting a lot of fellow forum members I see. Yeah, nice one. :rolleyes:

    Oh come on! I didn’t say EVERYONE who travels with Ryanair… Surely even you can appreciate that anyone who eats a £8000 winning scratch card has got to be some sort of serious retard.

    Andy

    in reply to: Ryanair passenger eats winning scratch card! #580622
    Skymonster
    Participant

    The flight was inbound to EMA (my local airport). I have it on very good authority that the incident was genuine, despite myself being a little cynical… Mind you in some ways I’m not surprised – as I said, just goes to show the sort of punters Ryanair drags out to fly :diablo:

    in reply to: Ryanair passenger eats winning scratch card! #580870
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Just goes to demonstrate the sort of customers Ryanair attracts to its flights! :rolleyes: :p 😀

    I rest my case! :dev2:

    Andy

    in reply to: How on earth did he not overshoot?? #581336
    Skymonster
    Participant

    If you’re up there willing an aeroplane to land, you should really be starting to think about going around! :rolleyes:

    Andy

    in reply to: How on earth did he not overshoot?? #581355
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I was thinking, come on, get her down, get her down, get her down…

    And just how do you “get her down”??? Once over the runway in the landing configuration with the power fully retarded, there’s not that much can be done to MAKE a plane land if the approach is hot or high, well at least not without risking bending the aeroplane…

    Andy

    in reply to: Tommy's Question Thread #581753
    Skymonster
    Participant

    The DC-9, BAC 1-11 and Caravelle had them, too.

    And in fact, Skydive Perris still use stairs in the rear of their DC-9-21 – the jumpers go out of the back.

    Andy

    in reply to: Jet2 2 x 763! #479455
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Jethros thinks otherwise

    in reply to: Plane Spotters Arrested in Delhi (Merged) #479908
    Skymonster
    Participant

    haha…. who do you fly for Andy?

    Nah, I don’t fly for a job (although I do have a share in a light aircraft)… I just work for a very large computer software company that has most of its development in Hyderabad and Bangalore, which I have to visit from time-to-time.

    Andy

    in reply to: Plane Spotters Arrested in Delhi (Merged) #479960
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Hyderabad belly actually… :rolleyes: In fact, I’m surprised that the hotel staff were suspicious of the spotters – seems to me like each time I go to India either myself of one of my colleagues is laid low and confined to a hotel room for a while! 😡

    Andy

    in reply to: Plane Spotters Arrested in Delhi (Merged) #479981
    Skymonster
    Participant

    They were due to leave today, but staff became suspicious after they did not emerge from their room for 24 hours.

    Last time I was in India I didn’t emerge from my hotel room for 24 hours either – more accurately, I don’t think I emerged from the toilet in my room for 24 hours actually!!! 😮

    Andy

    in reply to: Varsity Express? #481319
    Skymonster
    Participant

    SXFgirl, lots of chat about those issues on PPRuNe… 🙂 But indeed you are correct, without an AOC (this is a fact, not conjecture – the CAA website lists all AOC holders and Varsity is not one) its actually not an airline, but rather a ticket agent.

    Suggest that if you want to discuss more detail head over to PPRuNe as the moderators here seem to get all bent out of shape if anything adverse is said about a certain airline or its past mirror image! :rolleyes:

    Andy

    in reply to: Tommy's Question Thread #481516
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I think it is interesting to see that what some have got in their best, others have in their worst. I think it has to be a reflection of ‘on the day experience’, but for example, Andy has CDG (T2) in his worst, but I found it very good when transferring there recently, whilst he has T1 at LHR in his best, and whilst I haven’t flown through there for 5 years, each time I did fly out of there was always the same experience, long long queues round the check-in hall and BA and bmi staff running up and down the line desperately looking for passengers who should be on the next departing flights (accepting much of the BA congestion has been removed now anyway).

    Maybe, but I’ve been through CDG T2 and LHR T1 several times over the last year, and each time I’ve gotten the same impression. I would chose LHR T1 over any CDG terminal, anytime.

    Its also a case of how you are able to navigate through the airport. At LHR T1 for example, as a Star Alliance Gold, I can use premium checkin, the fast track security, the *A lounge, etc… At CDG, with no status on Skyteam, if I’m travelling steerage (as I do have to in Europe) I have to line up with the rest of the goats. Makes quite a difference to some parts of the process!

    Andy

    in reply to: Tommy's Question Thread #482527
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Of those I’ve flown through in the last 12 months, picking five of each:

    Worst – starting with the very worst

    East Midlands – long, long security lines, stroppy security staff, very poor facilities airside, no facilities landside, very little space – rammed full of chavs.

    Paris (T2) – just don’t go there – aweful

    Amsterdam Shiphol – too busy, long slow moving lines, too spread out

    Frankfurt – stark and unfriendly looking, relatively efficient, but far too big and spread out. Lack of contact gates means lots of busing, always seems to be in a state of rebuilding

    Washington Dulles – crazy immigration and security screening lines, worn out arounnd the edges, crowded gate areas, hateful transit lounges to move between concourses (although the air train has just gone into service)

    Best – starting with the best

    Singapore Changi – clea, efficient, spacious

    Kuala Lumpur Sepang – as Changi

    Munich – Germanic efficiency, a bit stark, but clean and comfortable and easy to connect at

    Heathrow T1 – efficient, fast, good both landside and airside for departures (arrivals needs some work) – only downside is a long walk to some gates

    Birmingham (main terminal) – usually calm, efficient, plenty of room, compact – can be slow with baggage reclaim, but that’s the only usual downer

    Honourable mention also to Los Angeles and London City – whilst neither are exceptional (except the price of a Stella Artois in the bar at LCY which was exceptional[ly expensive]), they both work well for me and are fairly pleasant to use

    Andy

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,877 total)