A320 departing Cairo!
A319 America West (final colours) retro-/heritage-jet
757 – pre-merger look
Andy
“Right wing down a bit, Hoskyns!”
One of O’Riley’s old clunkers burning up a lot of runway
Laurel Street, downtown San Diego
Travelling punters want lower and lower fares and don’t want to know about the consequences, or chose to ignore them. The less passengers pay, the more resources and people have to get stretched in order for the business to break even. This industry will get back to somewhere near sensible again when even relatively short round trip fares are consitantly measured with three digits, not two or even one. Until then, the risks are there if one cares to look (as the article reveals).
Andy
Also now an RAF C17 and VC10 arrived EMA this evening
Andy
Usually restrictions on where pax can sit with light loads is down to weight and balance issues
There were three RAF TriStars at EMA this morning – two from the previous day and one arrived this morning. At least one of the three has since left. There was a VDA AN124 overnighted Thursday-Friday, and another VDA AN124 today. All were Brize Norton diverts. Not sure whether Brize is totally snow-closed, or whether they are just short of snow-cleared ramp space.
Andy
Thankfully those of us involved took it seriously.
If you were there, then maybe you’d like to tell us what it was about, rather than just slagging off someone else
Uiver at Coventry
Andy
PH-BQH on its very first flight, doing a touch-and-go at Moses Lake, WA
PH-BFY landing at LAX with the towers of Century City in the background (taken from the famous “Top of the Radisson” – now sadly closed)
Andy
Kev, you’ve got a really good camera in the 450D – nothing wrong with it for aviation photography at all. The camera and lens you’ve got are ideal for air show static displays, and museums. With the lens you’ve got – again, nothing wrong with it – you are going to be primarily shooting ground shots as you will need a longer (telephoto) lens for flying aircraft at airshows and airports. If you do try shooting things further away (flying etc) then you are going to be getting some pictures of the proverbial minute aeroplanes you remember from times past.
My first piece of advice would therefore be – starting out, stick to the things the camera and lens are good at, which means ground shots in museums and airshows. The great thing is that digital imagery is largely free of charge, so you can experiment with the camera and bin any duffers without having the costs of developing and printing. That brings me to another thing – all of us take duff pictures from time to time (even the best photographers), but we just don’t show our bad pictures off!
My second piece of advice would be – try to learn a little about the camera, and photography. Read and understand the manual, and maybe get a book on general photography to try to learn about things like the affects of and the relationship between shutter speed, aperture, ISO settings, depth of field – and how they affect things like action photography, blurred props, etc. (my appologies if you already have a good understanding of all of this). If you do this, sooner or later you’ll be moving the camera off of the “full auto” (green box) setting and will start playing with it in modes like Av and Tv, etc. That’s no bad thing, particularly once you understand what changing these settings involves and will result in. It also won’t do any harm to start to get an appreciation of processing images on a computer either, as almost all digital pictures you see on these forums, on the internet in general, and in print these days will have had some degree of computer post-processing done on them (think of computer post-processing as a digital darkroom).
Finally, I will revert back to something I mentioned earlier. If you want to shoot flying displays or other flying subjects, sooner or later you will need another (telephoto) lens, probably a telephoto zoom. But for now, try to stick to what the camera and lens does best, and as you experiment more and more you might start to find the lens limiting – that’s when its time to consider a second lens. Above all enjoy photography – remember digital is cheaper and quicker than prints, and you DON’T have to show off you duffers unless you want some feedback on what went wrong!
Andy
Aeroflot – 777-200 from SVO to PEK (and v.v.) – once done, never again. Aircraft, although fairly new, was almost totally trashed inside (ripped seats, bits missing, stained seats, etc), cabin service was appauling, and the rest of the passengers were just…
Andy
If they had the guts to use Profiling then children would never be involved – nor would the majority of innocent pasengers.
Children have been used as mules/carriers of bombs in the past, so no justification to automatically exclude children from scanning. IF these body scanners work (I admit thats an IF!), then its absolutely disgraceful that campaigners would put child matters ahead of the safety of all air passengers, and it says a lot for the screwed up way our society thinks now.
Andy
No-one is suggesting anything like the situation that you describe.
I did read your post. Not allowing images inline with the post (however many) and forcing people to upload them to something like Flickr detracts from visitors looking at the pictures and is more of a faff than posting pictures inline. I’d have helped if you’d actually told everyone what this mysterious “large” number of pictures is, rather than expect contributors to contact the mods if they want to post more than a few images.
You can’t win Lance.
Well maybe it’d have helped if the mods had actually canvassed posters on what they wanted first, rather than just impose arbitary rules.
Andy
Another step towards killing off the commercial airline photo forum… First it was moved away from being a sub-forum to commercial aviation (meaning more clicks to get there – I usually can’t be bothered), and now we can’t show a number of images inline in the topic and visitors will have to click through to another site to see pictures – not showing pictures inline makes the viewing proposition far less attractive and a proportion of visitors won’t be bothered to click through to the linked photo site.