dark light

Skymonster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 1,877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: VC10 AND RB211s #576355
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I believe it was considered at one time, but as all above meant it was a non starter… Also, IIRC they realised two RB211s weighed somewhat less than four Conways, meaning that there would have been CofG issues

    Andy

    in reply to: Virgin sells carbon flight offsets #576357
    Skymonster
    Participant

    AN airline is attempting to embarrass its passengers into paying compensation for the climate change emissions of their flights by getting cabin crews to sell “carbon offsets” from the duty-free trolley.

    James Tallack, Which? transport researcher, said: “We would not want people to be made to feel uncomfortable. Offsetting is essentially an individual’s choice and these schemes are not yet regulated, which might undermine confidence in them.”

    It wouldn’t embarrass me – chances are you’d never see the passengers sat within earshot or the trolley dolly ever again. I’d just say (angrily if they woke me up to try to sell it to me!) that I didn’t believe in global warming and wasn’t interested in paying any more than I’d already done to fly.

    A

    in reply to: Dunsfold Parks B747 #576361
    Skymonster
    Participant

    It was not done for a Westlife video – it might have appeared on one after it was modified, but that’s merely coincidence. As was said further up, its appearance was changed to represent some mythical new aircraft design (can’t remember what it was called) that featured in the most recent Bond film Casino Royale.

    Andy

    in reply to: How many airlines would do this? #576366
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I don’t know what all the fuss is about. Can’t believe I’m defending Ryanair as I hate them, but… I know Ryanair get bad PR for not dealing with some situations well, but I doubt they go out of their way to make things more difficult than they need to be.

    So, there was an aircraft already on the ground due to RON in Dublin, and an aircraft coming in 1.5 hours late that wasn’t going to RON in Dublin. They effectively swapped the two aircraft plots around – nothing major, airlines do it all the time and a complication will only arise from swapping the two plots if one of the aircraft is scheduled for a maintenance input at a specific base that night.

    As for the standby crew… That’s what they’re on standby for – to recover irregular ops. For all we know, the crew on the delayed inbound might have been delayed enough to be out of hours to operate their final sector, and if so Ryanair would either have had to cancel their last flight (and the resulting first flight the following day as the aircraft would have been out of position), or put the standby crew onto it. Again, that’s what standy crews are for – no point in having crews on standby if you don’t use them, and if this all occurred late on in the day (which it sounds like it did) after all the crew scheduled to operate reported and sickness is therefore not going to be an issue for the remainder of the day, then you might as well use the standby crew to recover a delay.

    Andy

    in reply to: General Discussion #363292
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I’m proud to say that I got rid of my 4×4 last year. I now have a 2+2 seat coupe that (1) uses more fuel (lower mpg) than the 4×4 did, (2) has higher emissions than the 4×4 did, (3) is classified far less pedestrian friendly should I hit one than the 4×4 was, and (4) can, if I so wish, be driven much more wrecklessly than the 4×4 could. Not only all that, but my current car its far harder to see out of whilst driving, is far less practical, costs more to tax, and more to insure. But of course all the prats who stereotypically think 4x4s are all bad and other cars are better, have welcomed the fact that I rid of the 4×4. ******* em! When I change my car again I am DEFINITELY going back to a 4×4 – my concience will be clear as my next car will be better for the environment, better for pedestrians, and better for me and my wallet.

    A

    in reply to: four by fours #1923475
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I’m proud to say that I got rid of my 4×4 last year. I now have a 2+2 seat coupe that (1) uses more fuel (lower mpg) than the 4×4 did, (2) has higher emissions than the 4×4 did, (3) is classified far less pedestrian friendly should I hit one than the 4×4 was, and (4) can, if I so wish, be driven much more wrecklessly than the 4×4 could. Not only all that, but my current car its far harder to see out of whilst driving, is far less practical, costs more to tax, and more to insure. But of course all the prats who stereotypically think 4x4s are all bad and other cars are better, have welcomed the fact that I rid of the 4×4. ******* em! When I change my car again I am DEFINITELY going back to a 4×4 – my concience will be clear as my next car will be better for the environment, better for pedestrians, and better for me and my wallet.

    A

    in reply to: Emirates in large Airbus order #578762
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Quite a while until the first A350XWB rolls out – the way things are going, it might even have more orders than did the Plastic Pig from Seattle at rollout time! 😀

    A

    in reply to: Where Next For FR? #580795
    Skymonster
    Participant

    “Where next for FR?” The further away the better IMHO, and take the nasty piece of work that runs the airline along too

    Andy

    in reply to: EMA bmi Question #581006
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Oh, now I’ve reread your post I see you’re not departing until early afternoon. EMA shouldn’t be too busy at that time. And still, believe me, no problem with checking in at the desk for the bmi regional flight to BRU.

    Andy

    in reply to: EMA bmi Question #581009
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Don’t worry about the “must use self service or on-line check-in” thing… It won’t happen – maybe because its bmi regional rather than bmi, or maybe because its EMA and its their only route and they don’t have self-service machines. Either way, you’ll be fine checking in at the desk – trust me, I’ve done it several times. EMA security can be a real zoo first thing in the morning due all the Ryanairs, bmibabys and easyJets departing, but bmi regional passengers should be able to use the express line – will save you some time.

    Andy

    in reply to: EMA bmi Question #581237
    Skymonster
    Participant

    bmi’s only route from EMA is to BRU. They have one checkin desk at the very right hand side of the checkin hall for this flight and they don’t use self-service checkin. The queue should not be long anyway, as the flight is operated on an ERJ145 or ERJ135.

    Andy

    in reply to: Virgin Atlantic Co-Pilot Arrested At LHR #582588
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Why is it policy to replace the entire flight crew under these circumstances ?

    Probably because by the time a replacement F/O had been called out, got to the airport and prepped for the flight, the entire crew would have gone out of hours for their original planned duty.

    Andy

    in reply to: Gatwick, 23rd October (16 images) #446606
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Nice pics…

    Was N707JT there, or has it arrived since – still looked beautiful sat on the ramp at LGW this morning despite the gloom!

    Andy

    in reply to: 787 service entry – six months delay #586541
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Dazza – no other good reason to apply the same name to the 787 as was applied to the Reliant Robin – the “plastic pig” 😀

    in reply to: 787 service entry – six months delay #586721
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Oh you Monster Sky, not like Boeing to slip up like this, or Airbus for that matter.

    I’m not pro-Airbus/anti-Boeing in particular. Its just devine retribution for all those pro-Boeing folks who so bashed Airbus over the A380! :diablo:

    Andy

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 1,877 total)