dark light

Skymonster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Skymonster
    Participant

    The DC3 has it’s cabin door on the left…

    Incorrect actually… The original DC-3s (known as Douglas Sleeper Transports, or DSTs) had their passenger door on the RIGHT rear fuselage.

    Andy

    in reply to: No PFA rally in 2007 #394499
    Skymonster
    Participant

    It remains to be seen how the PFA membership will be affected… spotters/enthusiasts/photographers or whatever will no be asking themselves what actual benefit they will derive for their annual £40 subs… there is some interest in regional mini-rallies… maybe limiting the participation of non-PFA aeroplanes.

    Great… So, alienate the spotters/enthusiasts/photographers AND PFA members who fly standard production aeroplanes too! :rolleyes:

    Andy

    in reply to: Prestwick Thursday 12th – testing out my 400D. (Long) #450031
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Excellent pictures…

    The derelict 747 on the North side is being spruced up for some reason and it was getting a wash this day.
    http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l298/fredseg1/4942-Derelict747Prestwick12-10-06.jpg

    Looks more like they’re doing de-icing training to me, presumably in anticipation of the forthcoming inclement weather Scottish winters are famous for! :diablo:

    Andy

    in reply to: Air France 747-400s #521392
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I also notice that furnish their upperdeck with economy seats, the opposite of its sister airline, KLM.

    Not true for the entire fleet. I flew on F-GISA and F-GISB recently and both had business class on the upper deck. No idea what economy was like – didn’t go down/back there! :p

    Seatguru is a reasonable place to see the varous configs for AF 744s (there are more than are listed there too, I think(, but it doesn’t tie those configs back to registrations unfortunately.

    Andy

    in reply to: DUB-AMS route needs competition #523131
    Skymonster
    Participant

    EUR106/GBP70 for a return is a very realistic low fare for a route of that length – its typically only the Ryanairs and the easyJets that play the headline grabbing really low fares, and even they’re not available in large quantities. Go back a few years and a trip on a route of that length would likely have cost you at least double that, if not more.

    Andy

    in reply to: Ryanair route from Nottingham #524434
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Ryanair are adding ten new routes and three more aircraft to the Nottingham-East Midlands base over the winter.

    Andy

    in reply to: got this just on my radar…. #524438
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I know several people who have these, and the SBS-1 linked with a PC/laptop is awesome for airways spotting… But, I suspect that unless you are a registration collector its a gadget, and an expensive one at that, which will be used for a while and then will get less and less used.

    Bear in mind that the software does not come with the aircraft registrations pre-loaded – you only see the hex codes transmitted by the mode-s transponder by default – and that you have to find a source for the aircraft data (this is not a difficult or expensive task, just be aware that you have to do it).

    The other thing to consider is that the SBS-1 is not a real radar – it is a virtual radar. Basically, it receives mode-S/ADS-B transponder transmissions that including position, speed and altitude, and plots the aircraft positions from these messages. The result is very realistic and is real time, but it depends on the aircraft having a mode-s/ADS-b transponder and maybe only 50% of airliners (and even less GA) are equipped so far. This means that some trails pass overhead, but nothing appears on the screen – quite frustrating sometimes! I beleive that the deadline for installation of mode-s/ads-b is something like September 2008, so by that time these gadgets will plot pretty much anything flying overhead.

    Andy

    in reply to: UNITED OR VIRGIN TO US WEST COAST??? #525585
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Rickt,

    Just checked United’s website as I have to go back to SFO again in late October – the UA LHR-SFO-LHR schedule changes to 2 x 777 over the last weekend of October, the traditional timetable change weekend. Not sure when you’re planning to travel, but if UA runs true to form the 744 is likely to be back on one of their SFOs next summer (i.e. after the end of March 2007).

    The trip was fine, but tiring as it was not a holiday. The preferred trans-Atlantic airline of the company I work for is UA so I’ve used them quite a lot, but fortunately I’m able to travel business class these days – not that UA economy is bad, all airlines are much of a muchness. FWIW, if you like a drink during the flight, UA (and pretty much all the other US-airlines) charge for booze $5/£3 in economy, whereas Virgin don’t. Virgin have the better IFE (particularly compared to the UA 747-400 which only has the big screens in economy), but as has already been said UA are the only airline in the world to have live-ATC on their IFE system. Virgin is probably slightly better for the casual traveller (although maybe not for the frequent flyer mileage accumulators amongst us!!!) but I wouldn’t pay £200 extra to fly Virgin.

    Andy

    in reply to: UNITED OR VIRGIN TO US WEST COAST??? #525630
    Skymonster
    Participant

    United are using a 747-400 (the morning flight from LHR and the early afternoon flight from SFO) and a 777-200 (afternoon departure from LHR, evening departure from SFO) for their twice daily LHR-SFO-LHR operation this summer – I know because I just got off the 777 from SFO this lunchtime!!! UA 747-400s DON’T have seat-back PTVs in economy, but the 777s do. LHR-LAX-LHR with United was meant to be one 777-200 and one 767-300 during this summer although I’ve not checked to see this is what actually happened – both types have PTVs in Y-class. FWIW, SFO usually goes to two 777s in the winter, but I’ve not checked to see if this is happening this winter, and I think LAX downgrades to just one 777 service in the winter.

    Virgin use a 747-400 on SFO, and when I’ve seen them one 747-400 and one A340-600 on their double daily LAX operation.

    Andy

    in reply to: BN-Trislander questions… #530182
    Skymonster
    Participant

    You do know about Islanders/Trislanders don’t you…? See this about the new version coming out – no idea where it originated from, but it was posted on PPRuNe:

    “New design – BN2-XL

    Undaunted by technical realities, the design team at Pilatus Britten – Norman has announced plans for the BN2-XL, promising more noise, reduced payload, a lower cruise speed, and increased pilot workload.

    We spoke to Mr. Fred Gribble, former British Rail boilermaker, and now Chief Project Engineer. Fred was responsible for developing many original and creative design flaws in the service of his former employer, and will be incorporating these in the new BN2-XL technology under a licensing agreement. Fred reassured BN-2 pilots, however, that all fundamental design flaws of the original model had been retained. Further good news is that the XL version is available as a retrofit.

    Among the new measures is that of locking the ailerons in the central position, following airborne and simulator tests which showed that whilst pilots of average strength were able to achieve up to 30 degrees of control wheel deflection, this produced no appreciable variation in the net flight of the aircraft. Thus the removal of costly and unnecessary linkages has been possible, and the rudder has been nominated as the primary directional control. In keeping with this new philosophy, but to retain commonality for crews transitioning to the XL, additional resistance to foot pressure has been built in to the rudder pedals to prevent over-controlling in gusty conditions (defined as those in which wind velocity exceeds 3 knots). An outstanding feature of Islander technology has always been the adaptation of the O-540 engine, which mounted in any other aircraft in the free world (except the Trislander) is known for its low vibration levels. The Islander adaptations cause it to shake and batter the airframe, gradually crystallise the main spar, desynchronise the accompanying engine, and simulate the sound of fifty skeletons fornicating in an aluminium dustbin.

    PBN will not disclose the technology they applied in preserving this effect in the XL but Mr. Gribble assures us it will be perpetrated in later models and sees it as a strong selling point. “After all, the Concorde makes a lot of noise” he said, “and look how fast that goes.” However design documents clandestinely recovered from the PBN shredder have solved a question that has puzzled aerodynamicists and pilots for many years, disclosing that it is actually noise which causes the BN2 to fly. The vibration set up by the engines, and amplified by the airframe, in turn causes the air molecules above the wing to oscillate at atomic frequency, reducing their density and creating lift. This can be demonstrated by sudden closure of the throttles, which causes the aircraft to fall from the sky. As a result, lift is proportional to noise, rather than speed, explaining amongst other things the aircraft’s remarkable takeoff performance. In the driver’s cab (as Gribble describes it) ergonomic measures will ensure that long-term PBN pilots’ deafness does not cause in-flight dozing. Orthopaedic surgeons have designed a cockpit layout and seat to maximise backache, en-route insomnia, chronic irritability and terminal (post-flight) lethargy.

    Redesigned “bullworker” elastic aileron cables, now disconnected from the control surfaces, increase pilot workload and fitness. Special noise retention cabin lining is an innovation on the XL, and it is hoped in later models to develop cabin noise to a level which will enable pilots to relate ear-pain directly to engine power, eliminating the need for engine instruments altogether.

    We were offered an opportunity to fly the XL at Britten-Norman’s development facility, adjacent to the BritRail tearooms at Little Chortling. (The flight was originally to have been conducted at the Pilatus plant but aircraft of BN design are now prohibited from operating in Swiss airspace during avalanche season). For our mission profile, the XL was loaded with coal for a standard 100 nm trip with BritRail reserves, carrying one pilot and nine passengers to maximise discomfort. Passenger loading is unchanged, the normal under-wing protrusions inflicting serious lacerations on 71% of boarding passengers, and there was the usual confusion in selecting a door appropriate to the allocated seat. The facility for the clothing of embarking passengers to remove oil slicks from engine cowls during loading has been thoughtfully retained.

    Start-up is standard, and taxiing, as in the BN2 is accomplished by brute force. Takeoff calculations called for a 250-decibel power setting, and the rotation force for the (neutral) C of G was calculated at 180 ft/lbs of backpressure. Initial warning of an engine failure during takeoff is provided by a reduction in vibration of the flight instrument panel. Complete seizure of one engine is indicated by the momentary illusion that the engines have suddenly and inexplicably become synchronised. Otherwise, identification of the failed engine is achieved by comparing the vibration levels of the windows on either side of the cabin. (Relative passenger pallor has been found to be an unreliable guide on many BN2 routes because of ethnic consideration).

    Shortly after takeoff the XL’s chief test pilot, Capt. Mike “Muscles” Mulligan demonstrated the extent to whch modern aeronautical design has left the BN2 untouched; he simulated pilot incapacitation by slumping forward onto the control column, simultaneously applying full right rudder and bleeding from the ears. The XL, like its predecessor, demonstrated total control rigidity and continued undisturbed. Power was then reduced to 249 decibels for cruise, and we carried out some comparisons of actual flight performance with graph predictions. At 5000 ft and ISA, we achieved a vibration amplitude of 500 CPS and 240 decibels, for a fuel flow of 210 lb/hr, making the BN2-XL the most efficient converter of fuel to noise after the Titan rocket. Exploring the Constant noise/Variable noise concepts, we found that in a VNE dive, vibration reached its design maximum at 1000 CPS, at which point the limiting factor is the emulsification of human tissue. The catatonic condition of long-term BN2 pilots is attributed to this syndrome, which commences in the cerebral cortex and spreads outwards. We asked Capt. Mulligan what he considered the outstanding features of the XL. He cupped his hand behind his ear and shouted “WHAT?” We returned to Britten-Norman convinced that the XL model retains the marque’s most memorable features, whilst showing some significant and worthwhile regressions. PBN are not, however, resting on their laurels. Plans are already advanced for the Trislander XL and noise tunnel testing has commenced. The basis of preliminary design and performance specifications is that lift increases as the square of the noise, and as the principle of acoustic lift is further developed, a later five-engined vertical take-off model is also a possibility.”

    in reply to: BN-Trislander questions… #530186
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Sorry for the rather bizarre questions, but all will come apparrent in due course – hopefully… 😉

    Don’t tell me, you’re starting an airline that might use Trislanders – one of several types you’ve considered for your airline over time… The airline is going to be called AlphaTwo! 😀

    Andy

    PS: As far as I’m aware, the JAR flight time limitations scheme (CAP371 still?) should be equally as applicable to Trislander pilots operating public transport flights as it would be for a 747 pilot. Can’t remember now (its a long time ago) whether there might have been different limits for single pilot operations – it wasn’t something that concerned most of the larger airlines. Suggest you do a search on google for CAP371 and or flight time limitations and you’ll find the relevent docs. As far as pay – no idea

    in reply to: The end of cameras onboard a flight ??? #530235
    Skymonster
    Participant

    So you are quite happy to see loads of people, with families and youngsters with dreams, all unemployed? You obviously haven’t experienced this yourself. Having experienced this myself, I think your comments are a disgrace.

    Yes I have worked in airlines, and yes I have been made redundant. Despite that, I still think that the airline industry overall, and in particular the people who work within it, would have been far better off right now if Ryanair had never existed.

    Andy

    in reply to: The end of cameras onboard a flight ??? #530674
    Skymonster
    Participant

    OK, let me clear this up seeing as its come up again.

    Firstly, I do NOT hope Ryanair bend an aeroplane – far from it. But even the man himself said that one of the things that could damage his business was a major accident.

    The airline industry is cyclic, and just as service levels have gone up, down, up and down again within the “frills” airlines in response to economics and customer demand, I believe that sooner or later the pendulum will start to swing against Ryanair either because people tire of their way of operating and their service levels, or because (and again I emphasise I don’t want to see it happen) of an incident that darkens customer thinking about the no-frills space. The no-frills space won’t go away, but the boyancy that it currently enjoys will diminish at some time, I’m certain. Ryanair may be able to find more gullible punters (and thus maintain some growth) by moving out of existing markets and developing new ones, but I believe at some time in the future its current core business in the UK and near western Europe will turn downwards.

    Its worth adding that as a passenger I am not totally against the low-cost/no-frills airline space. I don’t enjoy using it, but that’s my perogative – I only use low-fare carriers when there is no other reasonable choice. As far as Ryanair is concerned, I believe that they cut the service levels too far, and that’s why I won’t use them – ever. Southwest (in particular), easyJet and even bmiBaby manage to deliver a better product for the customer when the proverbial “wheels fall off” the master plan, and its the unpreparedness of Ryanair to do the same that I don’t like. And before Redsquare again tries to tell me that Ryanair does provide good service recovery, I hold up an example where I was travelling GVA-BHX with Lufthansa a while ago – when the RJ85 broke, within five minutes and without asking they had rebooked my on SNBA so I still got back to BHX at a similar time to what I was expecting to do, despite the fact that LH could have flown me back themselves four hours later. That’s proper service recovery.

    As far as Mpacha’s comment above is concerned, I make no appologies for the fact that I do indeed hope Ryanair disappears – the entire airline industry will be better for it, even if some customers might think they’re not. I acknowledge that I have a right to chose not to fly with Ryanair if I don’t like it, but it goes further than that. I strongly believe that Ryanair (in particular, but to an extent the low-fare sector in general) have done more to damage the airline industry in the long term, and more particularly the conditions of the people who work within it, than anything else. The airline industry is NOT a nice place for many people to work now – longer hours, lower pay, more stress, ruder passengers than was the case ten years ago. This has largely been brought about by the low-fare sector, Ryanair in particular. There are some savings not worth making IMHO.

    OK, so to reitterate. I don’t want to see Ryanair have an accident, I don’t want to see anyway hurt. But I would like to see the demise of Ryanair and whilst I doubt that will happen, I firmly believe that at some time in the future their style will have to change or their business will turn down – its just a matter of time, which IMHO can’t come too soon.

    Andy

    in reply to: never seen this before #532045
    Skymonster
    Participant

    You mean the piper?

    You mean that “piper” made by Mooney??? :rolleyes:

    Andy

    in reply to: Embraer 195 FlyBe Tour of UK #537662
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Believe most EMBs to Europe deliver mid-Atlantic – Recife (Brasil), Sal (Cape Verde Islands), and then an appropriate airport on the Europe mainland en-route to where they’re going to end up.

    Andy

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,877 total)