dark light

Skymonster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 1,877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Some interesting aircraft here #465419
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Interesting pics… DC-8 VR-BIA is not at East Mids though – looks more like Stansted.

    Andy

    in reply to: Major Delays UK Airports today, 10th August. #548555
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Are you a complete fool? It is common knowledge that these sort of things can be adapted to do other things….like setting off bombs.

    Well Done to all the Police, Special Branch and Airport Security accross the nation.

    No I am not a complete fool, I am merely a very regular air traveller who could predict the kind of chaos and significant commercial difficulties that were created. As soon as Willie Walsh, Michael O’Leary and the likes started saying the whole thing was unsustainable, changes were almost inevitable. And as events this morning have proven, I was somewhat closer to the mark than the doom-mongers who said these restrictions would go on for months.

    Andy

    in reply to: WHO IS THIS OUTFIT PLEASE #549085
    Skymonster
    Participant

    It was a brief item in the Airliner World “News” section the month before last (or maybe two months ago now if the new issue is out!). UK – LGW, MAN and EMA initially actually – to several places in the Middle East. The article said that they had secured two ex-UA 767-200s. Funny thing is, I gather that one of the reasons why UA retired the 762s was that they were not RVSM capable, and it was going to cost too much to refit them with the kit. Can’t see that situation has changed? Don’t know whether AW know something or whether they were just quoting from the website. I gather that they’re the same outfit that was once known as Air Tigra.

    http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=230775
    http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=165547

    Andy

    in reply to: Moslems 'boycott' Glasgow Airport #549330
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Every time I’ve been to the US for the past couple of years (except for my last two trips), when I’ve checked in and they’ve entered my name into their computer, they’ve had to go off and “check” something taking my passport and all with them. This has involved me standing around at the checkin desk for quite a time, often being stared at by other passengers. First time it happened, I was concerned and worried because I didn’t know what was happening. After that first time it became less and less of an issue – I got to expect it, I’ve got nothing to hide and I knew from past experience that the outcome wouldn’t be an issue and that my travel would not be a problem. I now gather a name similar to mine was “marked” post 9/11. Earlier this year, I was stopped at customs going into the USA and during the chat with the officer, he mentioned that I had a “marked” name and that he could sort that out for me in particular. So he tapped away at his computer. Ever since then, I’ve not had the extra “check” prior to checkin. Anyhow, the reason I point this out is because I have been singled out for special attention, and I’m not concerned about it because it actually makes things safer.

    So, what I actually believe is that its about time we got into proper profiling based on behaviorial, characteristic and yes even ethnic traits. If developing profiles for high risk travellers prove that muslims and responsible for the majority of terrorist attacks, then muslims need to expect to be checked more dilligently and more regularly. Its not victimisation, its a risk assessment based on a person conforming to a certain profile. As long as its done on a justified rather than an emotional basis, then tough on those subjected to it, but that’s how it should be so STFU and get on with it. Sorry, but the time for PC is over, its time to do what is proven to best secure our air travel network in the most effective and efficient manner.

    Andy

    in reply to: Major Delays UK Airports today, 10th August. #549570
    Skymonster
    Participant

    My company is equally worried but purchasing insurance for our laptops resolves the issue. We also make sure we always have back ups….

    Andrew, the problem is not so much the laptop itself, its the sensitive data on them which could be “misused” – despite encripting some data, its still not 100% secure.

    Andy

    in reply to: Major Delays UK Airports today, 10th August. #549584
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Just to illustrate the abject stupidity of the “new” rules as they are currently applied…

    In the company I work for, if we travel UK domestic with a laptop as most of us HAVE to do every time on business, our domestic travel now has to be on Virgin/GNER/etc trains rather than BA or BMI because the company won’t take the risk of laptops being checked in and getting lost. We put a lot of business BMI/BA’s way, especially MAN-LHR, GLA-LHR, EDI-LHR and NCL-/MME-LHR, and typically £200 a pop MAN-LHR because its booked last minute for peak period flights.

    Thing is, you have to check laptops and yet no one (especially not the airlines) will take reponsibility for guaranteeing their security in the hold or that they’ll arrive at the other end. How long before these corporate policies become widespread and shart hurting the airlines? Not long for sure – almost certainly already happening. Again, I’m not suggesting the security problem is ignorred, but someone’s got to find a better way that what we have now, and fast.

    Andy

    in reply to: Major Delays UK Airports today, 10th August. #549854
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Profiling – and I mean proper profiling, not indiscriminate victimisation of people in certain groups – is something we’ve got to do more of in an attempt to secure the air travel network. And if profiling “fingers” certain ethnic groups more than others, then I think that’s a consequence we’ve all got to accept from now on. America has done it for ages – if you buy a one way ticket, if you book within a certain time frame, if you request a certain type of airline meal, if your surname is… As long as the profiling and selection is done on the basis of reasoned justification, its fine. Time for PC is over, its time to use information to work for everyone’s safety rather than say we can’t do it because it’ll upset a minority.

    Andy

    in reply to: Major Delays UK Airports today, 10th August. #550029
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Skymonster and others, you’re going to be eating your words if something ever did happen to harm innocent lives as a result of security measures being stepped down too soon. Yes, all this is very much an inconvenience to all passengers (more so business) but I would like to believe it is being implemented with the passenger’s safety in mind. 4 weeks out of 52 is not much to ask if it means it gives the Government(s) time to ensure that all threats their intelligence have acquired have been controlled. Remember your stereotypical white middle-aged office businessman may also have converted to Muslim and have been brainwashed into terrorist related thoughts?

    No I’m not going to eat my words – I’ll just accept it as a consequence of the world we live in. AND I’ll still get on aeroplanes on that basis too – see below.

    But in any case, you just don’t get it Judas, do you? 😮 Yes, security has to be in place, but its not about waiting a while and everything will be rosy again. The problems need to be fixed NOW. The choice isn’t between travelling and being subjected to insane levels of security, or travelling and getting blown up. The choice is between travelling and getting subjected to insane levels of security, or not travelling. Those with discretion – and those with discretion are actually the high-yielding business travellers who REALLY make the airlines money, will chose not to travel. Its already happening. These measures will f**k up the airline industry. Sure, a few people may not get blown up if you believe all the hype, but the alternative will be a lot of people on the dole if this carries on much longer. Again, I’m not saying forget security – I’m saying that the government can’t go on for more than a few days buring its head in the sand and saying “go about your business as usual” because it isn’t going to happen and it’ll do immense damage.

    It is impossible to totally secure the air travel system, or any other travel system for that matter. I firmly believe that if the country wants to continue to have a viable airline industry (or not having one, with all the consequences to the wider UK economy that entails), sooner or later we are going to HAVE to face up to the fact that air travel carries some inherant risk to life, and we will each need to decide whether to live with the consequences of those risks or not to travel. I can live with the consequences of that, and I will travel on that basis too.

    Andy

    in reply to: Major Delays UK Airports today, 10th August. #550272
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I am hearing the government want the hand luggage ban is to be imposed for 4 weeks and thats not from a media source…. They also said they would gradually relax it but luiquids and electronics unlikely to be allowed for duration of 4 weeks. (i.e. books can be brought on)

    That would be the height of stupidity on the part of the government. Reports on BBC this morning that business travellers are transferring to Paris departures (and using Eurostar to get to Paris) at an average rate of 10 a minute, to avoid the idiotic restrictions in place here in the UK. Business travellers will not give up lap tops and car keys to the vagaries of checked baggage – my company has already issued and edict on laptops. If they take that long to lift restrictions, many many high revenue customers will have been lost to UK carriers and that’ll have a massive impact on their business – those most likely to stick with their flights despite restrictions are the lower fare leisure travellers. I’m not suggesting we shouldn’t have security, but they’ve got to find a better way than this and fast, or there’s going to be a significant downturn in the airline industry that’s going to cost a lot of jobs.

    FWIW, if a passenger can carry electronic devices from the USA to the UK, why not the other way – do they honestly think anyone intent on doing nasty deeds could not fly to the US without the things they need, buy them there, and then commit their crime on the way back?

    Madness, absolutely madness. It needs sorting out, it needs sorting out fast, and it needs sorting out so that the same rules are applied across the board.

    Andy

    in reply to: Major Delays UK Airports today, 10th August. #550546
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Personally though i don’t think today is about the Government or Politics its about how our Security service and police have worked today and “Disrupted” a Huge terror attack.

    Of course its about government and politics. If our government (and that of the USA) hadn’t messed with the politics and government of other countries, we wouldn’t have this problem today. Ask yourself why this problem has surfaced here, and not in other countries that have taken a much more distant stand to what’s happening in other parts of the world. Whilst not directly CAUSED by the government, this entire problem is of the government’s making. Sadly, they are far too arrogant to admit that.

    Andy

    in reply to: Major Delays UK Airports today, 10th August. #550787
    Skymonster
    Participant

    There needs to be a more reasoned set of responses rather than the knee-jerk banning of carry ons. Few business people are going to check laptops without better guarantees that they’ll actually arrive, and arrive undamaged. Many won’t put remote key fobs in checked baggage because of the risk of them getting lost. What is happening today – most people just putting up with it – will change if procedures aren’t changed quickly, because most travellers right now are leisure and want to go on holiday. Banning liquids might be practical, banning electronics not so. Once we get to the peak business demand in September, international business travel will just die if these restrictions remain in place – business travellers for the most part book and short notice, pay the premium fares that make the airlines their profits, and just won’t if it becomes too difficult.

    As an illustrative point, I have to go to San Francisco in September on busiess. No way will my employer let me check a laptop into hold baggage, both because of the cost of it going missing and also because of the risk of sensitive information on it going astray. If these restrictions remain in place just for UK flights, I will probably end up going on the Eurostar to Paris and then flying from Paris to San Francisco. What does that mean? Easy – the UK airline industry loses revenue, UK airlines decline, UK airline employees lose their jobs. If the UK does this for more than a few days, MANY MANY other business travellers from other countries will simply avoid the UK, further damaging our economy. Leaving these punative knee jerk reactions in place will therefore mean the government risks presiding over the downfall of the UK airline industry and a downturn in business in general.

    What has been done is ill-considered. The answer is to put more rigourous checking in place, not banning things. If that takes a bit more time at the airport, people will understand, but if you put in place restrictions that make things too difficult people will not travel.
    Andy

    in reply to: Major Delays UK Airports today, 10th August. #551001
    Skymonster
    Participant

    What absolute over-reaction! Insane. Does anyone, for example, think its reasonable to put car keys in checked bags just because there’s a remote in the key? And then the bag goes missing (as has happened to me on a number of occasions). What then? No chance. What dick-heads they are. I really have no problem being subjected to additional security screening, even if that means processing takes longer, but to put some of these punative restrictions in what can be taken on board in place will just drive people away from the airlines and if it continues in the longer term will destroy the industry.

    Andy

    in reply to: Shot of the day… (Maybe week, year!?) #551955
    Skymonster
    Participant

    The shot is fascinating and a great catch. HOWEVER, it has been over-manipulated beyond what has been allowed on airliners.net and on that basis should never have got onto their database. The problem is not the rainbow trail, but the black sky. The screeners have really let themselves down by firstly accepting the photo and secondly by defending its addition whilst at the same time similarly manipulated shots have been rejected many times in the past. Its great for the photographer but very sad for where it takes airliners.net and nicely demonstrates why I have very little time for that site and most of the people who run it anymore.

    ANdy

    in reply to: MAN – South Side Story #467534
    Skymonster
    Participant

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v641/Grey_Area/N194AA_1_070806.jpg

    ……………. :p

    Yeah, but it was further away then… Don’t you understand perspective and distance! :diablo:

    Andy

    PS: Nice one, I still haven’t got a good pic of an AA 757 with bent wings

    in reply to: Air tax hike 'would hit poorest' #552871
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Seeing as the low-cost carriers are contributing most to the GROWTH in air travel (and thus growth in emissions), seems only fair that their passengers pay most to offset the emssions their flights are causing! Besides, anything that puts off all the Ryanair passengers that seem to be clogging up airport terminals these days can’t be a bad thing! 😉

    Andy

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 1,877 total)