That is VERY insensitive Andy. Knowing full well Martin is an active member on these forums. Bad form!
No, I didn’t realise that there was anyone involved with the airline on this forum – in passing I had seen a post about it whilst I was away in the US and unable to really keep track of the forum on a daily basis, but I didn’t have time to really read it.
Can’t you read? It clearly states it is a delay.
Yes, just like FlyBlu/Who or whatever delayed their operation :rolleyes:
I’ll say no more due to the seeming “sensitivities” here… Maybe if people involved in the airline do participate in this forum, they might want to shed some light on what’s gone wrong?
Andy
Nice pics – looks like they need to go out and pull up the weeds on one of those taxiways!!!
Andy
Nice pics – looks like they need to go out and pull up the weeds on one of those taxiways!!!
Andy
MYT have TWO Skyservice A320s and one Skyservice 757 lined up for summer lease – they’re all due go home again at the end of October.
Andy
MYT have TWO Skyservice A320s and one Skyservice 757 lined up for summer lease – they’re all due go home again at the end of October.
Andy
I think it looks great – but who am I to pass judgement in the face of the obviously more informed views of the airline-livery luminaries on this forum :rolleyes:
Andy
PS: Thai had two 747-400 “Barges” – HS-TGJ and HS-TGO – so obviously now ‘GJ is repainted there is but one, plus the A330 “barge”
I think it looks great – but who am I to pass judgement in the face of the obviously more informed views of the airline-livery luminaries on this forum :rolleyes:
Andy
PS: Thai had two 747-400 “Barges” – HS-TGJ and HS-TGO – so obviously now ‘GJ is repainted there is but one, plus the A330 “barge”
None of us really know exactly what was happening with the fuel on that Phuket Air plane in SHJ, because the whole incident has been reported differently in various publications.
However, fundamentally I think that there are far too many armchair pilots out there who, when travelling on an airplane, see or hear something they don’t understand and panic por think they know better. I believe that it is incumbent on us all to accept that aircrew are professional, trained, and know far more about what they’re doing and the workings of the equipment they operate than do any general passengers (including ourselves – 99% of us here don’t really understand the detailed workings of a 747). On that basis, passengers should leave well alone with operational matters and accept that no matter how unusual a situation seems, the crew do not have some form of death wish.
I have, for example, seen passengers panic about smoke coming into the cabin through overhead vents when in fact all it was was an over-enthusiastic air conditioning system restling with very humid tropical atmosphere. Where does one draw the line, when do we regard passenger reaction as unnecessary over-reaction bordering on dangerous interference, and accept that the crew would be right to tell them to sit down and STFU? Ironically of course, there have been worse things gone on in the industry from time to time – I saw one or two of them in during my past time in the airlines – but the passengers don’t panic because they can’t see what’s happening and therefore aren’t aware. Ignorance is bliss, maybe?
I suspect that some of the passengers involved in the Phuket Air incident are just the sort of people who would be prepared to drive a car in questionable or unroadworthy condition, or drive too close behind the vehicle in front on a motorway, but that those same people would resent any judgemental comments being made about their motoring habits.
Anyway, bottom line – leave it to the crew who are acting in a professional capacity and in the best interests of themselves, the passengers and the airline.
Andy
None of us really know exactly what was happening with the fuel on that Phuket Air plane in SHJ, because the whole incident has been reported differently in various publications.
However, fundamentally I think that there are far too many armchair pilots out there who, when travelling on an airplane, see or hear something they don’t understand and panic por think they know better. I believe that it is incumbent on us all to accept that aircrew are professional, trained, and know far more about what they’re doing and the workings of the equipment they operate than do any general passengers (including ourselves – 99% of us here don’t really understand the detailed workings of a 747). On that basis, passengers should leave well alone with operational matters and accept that no matter how unusual a situation seems, the crew do not have some form of death wish.
I have, for example, seen passengers panic about smoke coming into the cabin through overhead vents when in fact all it was was an over-enthusiastic air conditioning system restling with very humid tropical atmosphere. Where does one draw the line, when do we regard passenger reaction as unnecessary over-reaction bordering on dangerous interference, and accept that the crew would be right to tell them to sit down and STFU? Ironically of course, there have been worse things gone on in the industry from time to time – I saw one or two of them in during my past time in the airlines – but the passengers don’t panic because they can’t see what’s happening and therefore aren’t aware. Ignorance is bliss, maybe?
I suspect that some of the passengers involved in the Phuket Air incident are just the sort of people who would be prepared to drive a car in questionable or unroadworthy condition, or drive too close behind the vehicle in front on a motorway, but that those same people would resent any judgemental comments being made about their motoring habits.
Anyway, bottom line – leave it to the crew who are acting in a professional capacity and in the best interests of themselves, the passengers and the airline.
Andy
1st A380 was moved to the flight test apron today.
Andy
1st A380 was moved to the flight test apron today.
Andy
Sure will!
Andy
Sure will!
Andy
Sometimes I have to travel steerage – depends on the purpose of the journey and who’s paying! I like to travel UA because they have “economy plus” seating at the front of all their economy cabins – a number of rows of seats with extra leg-room and priority in-flight service which are available to full fare economy passengers and crucially, at no extra cost (on any fare), to any Star Alliance airline’s gold card holders. To all intents and purposes, UA’s E+ is almost as good as BMI’s premium economy, although bmi charge a hefty extra for the additional leg room. All it takes after the bookings are made is a quick call to UA in London and they’ll pre-allocate economy plus for the entire trip.
Andy
Sometimes I have to travel steerage – depends on the purpose of the journey and who’s paying! I like to travel UA because they have “economy plus” seating at the front of all their economy cabins – a number of rows of seats with extra leg-room and priority in-flight service which are available to full fare economy passengers and crucially, at no extra cost (on any fare), to any Star Alliance airline’s gold card holders. To all intents and purposes, UA’s E+ is almost as good as BMI’s premium economy, although bmi charge a hefty extra for the additional leg room. All it takes after the bookings are made is a quick call to UA in London and they’ll pre-allocate economy plus for the entire trip.
Andy