Yep it’s all a load of hokum and scaremongering. The arguments against digital in the link in the first post are complete nonesense. As we have discussed before.

It is up to the individual to ensure they use a reliable backup medium, and to monitor those backups. That always has been, and always will be the case – regardless of whether you use film/analogue or digital media.

i hesitated for a second but no, that’s no G.50V, I’m 110% sure, and it’s no G.55 at all, I almost know the G.55 by heart!
Completely different landing gears, canopy, wing and tail section.
It’s a postwar plane (there are no swastikas, but the postwar finnish insigna), and it’s not a morko morane either.. I’ve seen those landing gears before but cannot remember where!

Looks very similar to the G55 to me. Finland are reported to have flown G50’s during the war too – so a G50 V wouldn’t be beyond the realms of comprehension. They look very similar, photographically, to me. But I hesitate to say you’re wrong, because I truly don’t know for sure.

It certainly isn’t a BF109 – the undercarriage appears to retract towards the centre of the aircraft and in profile, the nose bears a remarkable similarity in the positioning of various bulges and the air intake underneath. The tail appears to be similarly rounded at the top rear, and the wing looks to be as thin.

How about “The Big Show” by Pierre Clostermann?

That gets my vote.

What a beaut! It goes to show that sponsorship doesn’t have to be ugly. It would be nice, though, if the Sea Vixen looked as smart as that.

See http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=42719

The war movie “South Pacific” was made in the Cook Islands. USN Catalina’s are prevalent throughout the film.

fertilizer

Organic or chemical?