You did a great deal more than Point & Click to get this shot – you might have done it subconsciously, or even as part of a burst of pictures – but as the shutter stops presentation through the viewfinder on these kinds of cameras (unlike true SLRs), you must have been panning and judging and all sorts to get it so well:
Trouble with “Vintage” is, is that it is ambiguous. If I say over 25 year old designs, pretty much all but the very latest military jets count!
Which is the mistake I’ve made with the Cessna.
So, I’m going to shut up on the subject, and try to get some sort of concensus from you lot!
I will add all the photos, except those that are clearly disqualified (ground bound), to the voting thing on Sunday. It will be up to you guys, the voters, to decide then.
Canon C-740UZ
Yes, if you mean, Olympus Camedia, very clear shots, too.
The Tutor was designed the year I was born – hhhmmmm – am I Vintage.
Well all the girls I know seem to think so 😡
I think also, that Olivier’s Cessna & Piaggio photos don’t really count, as they aren’t really “Vintage” IMV – maybe the Cessna Skywagon (1978 design I believe) is, just about. Ok, I’ll allow the Cessna – but not the Piaggio (1986).
I guess Gateguard hasn’t read the rules!
Whereas this one, by Stewart1a (don’t understand why he didn’t think much of his work) shows a great deal of evocative emotion – a flight of Spits returning in the evening: –
Yes, and no. Those that can achieve all that, within a limited timeframe, with a camera which isn’t exactly designed for the task, takes a bit more than just out and out luck.
Part of the competition’s aim is to see how well this type of camera handles this type of work, too.
This picture by Guzziniel, for instance, must have employed settings other than the default, shows a great degree of steadiness of hand, too and – importantly – timing.
To get a blurred prop, on an S5000 at least, is difficult to do full stop!
🙁
coanda
We still want to see them, M8, put them on a new thread – please!
Why must the planes be in flight?
Because it is harder to do!
Taking a photo of a static aircraft is relatively easy – you can get to chose your position, wait for lighting, etc. Not so with a plane in flight, where you only get a relatively few seconds of even a 5 or 10 minute display with a camera like this – or even less if it’s just a flypast.
What do you mean? “Previous”! :diablo:
Wolverhampion Wanderer
Hey – Ditto!
Ashma Parrrurk (Ashmore Park)
Coanda – they’re lovelly – BUT, if they’ve been taken with an SLR Non-Digital camera, they are disqualified too.
The competition is for Non SLR – but Digital Cameras, such as the Fuji Finepix S5000 – digital, but not SLR. Scanned photos are disqualified.
Cheaper cameras with through the lens viewfinders are not necessarily SLRs, as they simply provide a small LCD viewscreen.
Lovelly, though – as I said.
OMG 😮
Yep – please don’t forget this is a competition – the best Vintage aircraft, photographed in flight, this year, by a non- SLR digital camera, such as the S5000 or of similar design or lower price.
I’ll close the competition on Sunday next, then everyone (contributor or not) can vote on their favourite.
There must be more of us with cheapish cameras – come on lads & lasses, I’m showing you mine, lets see yours :diablo:
Still Yeovilton: –
Some more of mine!
You sure that’s not the Corgi display in your local model shop ???
:diablo: :diablo: :diablo:
😀 Only kidding – phabulous.