:dev2:
Southend on Sea – seen from the Lifeboat Station on the end of the Pier – 31st May 2004
I’ve not included the Venom, Fury and a few other jets
Post them – jets are not excluded.
HP Photosmart is about as basic as it gets – it’s not a DSLR, so it counts – as does the Canon C750UZ.
The defining factor is whether or not it is an SLR and would now cost less than £500 new. Just because you can see a picture from the lens in the viewfinder doesn’t make it an SLR. If it has an ELECTRONIC viewfinder and costs less than £500 new NOW it counts.
Some nice shots already I see. Keep it up everyone.
Part of this has now become a competition among cameras too – perhaps one of the expert photographers here will be able to help us judge which camera has resulted in the best technical results. The competition though, is which is the best picture aesthetically & subject to the whims of the voters.
Scanned photographs are not allowed
Yep – that’s okay – it’s an older design – roughly on a par with the S5000 – that goes for the 2800zoom and its derivatives too.
Basically, any inexpensive non SLR digital camera, I guess.
Perhaps we should start an S5000 Aviation Photo Club – or something!
Note the missing stars!
More, from Kemble, June 20th: –
Yep, I use the same Fuji 1.5x Telephoto. You have to set the camera up to take photos at 6mp – the default is half that – which is why your photo is much smaller – or I think you might try RAW mode, but I don’t.
The way to get pictures of planes in flight is a bit frustrating. You need to depress the shutter button halfway to get it to focus and set the whitebalance and whatnot, then take the shot when you’re ready – keep moving with the plane.
Robbo and others have also shown me how to slow down the shutter, but I find that it still isn’t adequate to blur props in flight, as the background washes out badly, so jets should be better. I leave it in auto mode most of the time though. Its better when its cloudy.
The older an aircraft gets, the more it costs.
If it’s design goes out of production, and it’s engines become uneconomic to run by todays standards. Otherwise that might not be true.
My headmaster was not pleased, called me in for a stern lecture on the need to pick scholastic tomes
Proof, if any were needed, that some people – Headmasters or not – simply don’t understand what makes good literature.
Yep, it was taken at Branscombe, by me, with an S5000
Hi RobAnt
I have just sent you a squillion $
Cool – now where’s the dataplate? I’ll rip it out and get my secret team of engineers in my buried workshops in the mountain on my secret island in the carribean to start building up from there tomorrow. Should take about 6 months, as our fabrication plant is already built and able to make any part required.
I’ll accidentally lose the scap somewhere along the way (I have a big ship with a big crane) – money, being no object, I’ll not even bother recycling anything.
Incidentally, I also have the brainwave patterns of every Vulcan pilot that every lived, a pair of glasses and a doohickey that whizzes round and round imparting all their knowledge and experience on me.
Ta for the extra dosh.
’90
Is it one of these two?
errr.. i think that’s called Fraud, so honest brokers dont – and it would show up if anyone on ebay checked a possible problem.
you cud always ask ebay to check.
If money was no object, I’d buy her and do absolutely whatever it takes to get her flying again. On the premise that I flew in her, of course.
But unfortunately money is a very very very very very big object.
I think you’ll find that most, if not all, of those are actually new ‘planes with bits thrown in for provenance. Rather than old ‘planes with new bits to make them flyable again. The difference is subtle, but vital.