some of the forum members using this site should stop speculating about what is going to appear,what might appear and what you want to appear at legends.
Perhaps you’d like to be a bit more specific, Steve, which forum members?
Personally, I see no problem in a little speculation – it adds to the fun – we are a group separated over a wide geographical area – world-wide in fact. We don’t have the luxury of chatting over a pint down the pub.
While I acknowledge that this is a public forum, readable by everyone, I don’t think that such a discussion needs to be held behind closed doors.
No one in “the know” is obliged to respond – so I don’t see why you have a problem – or why you need to raise this as a topic at all, in fact.
I can say that I would agree if someone were being abusive towards the organisers, and perhaps this is what you are really trying to say. But as to speculation and/or guess work – no problem, in my view.
Postscript:
I don’t own, and would never contemplate owning an “anorak” hateful piece of outdoor attire in my view. Nor will you catch me writing down the serial number of every aircraft in view – although I may make a note or two on the subject of my photos or videos.
the Nairn road (A46),
You mean the A96 – I was posted to Lossiemouth in the mid-’70’s & spent what now seems like the best 3 years of the life there. However, I may be wearing rose-tinted glasses.
As Flambards is right next door to RNAS Culdrose, (and they have an Airday on Wed 14th July) it should be quite easy to check it out shortly.
I must say, that looks almost “indecent” 😮
Fundraising will need to continue for the entire duration of the project, and beyond.
I guess you’re right about the guy not flying them during the war – my guess is that he flew something else during the war, and moved on to TR33s shortly after. He certainly seems to have been involved in them in some way.
There is a current restoration project in place. Will it fly? Good question.
http://www.home.gil.com.au/~bfillery/mossie11.htm
http://www.home.gil.com.au/~bfillery/mossie12.htm
My understanding is that she is now retired – saw her at either Yeovilton, or more probably, Culdrose a year, or maybe two, ago – where I heard it was her last year, or something – its all a bit sketchy to me now.
http://www.f4aviation.co.uk/airshow01/boscombe/xv208.htm

This image is from the f4aviation website, Copyright Tom Mcghee 2001 – I hope they don’t mind me posting this link. If so, please comment and I’ll remove it.
It is mentioned in Hansard, on the 2 Apr 2001, that DERA were looking for alternative customers for her, but I’m not sure that any were found.
Her role was taken over by a British Aerospace 146-300 region jet operated by British Aerospace Systems from Woodford, Manchester & operated by the Met Office.
I know a fellow who now lives (or at least lived a couple of years ago) near Redruth who flew TR33’s from a carrier during the War – I’m afraid I forget his name off the top of my head.
Although his office had plenty of memorabilia (photos and whatnot), he was extremely reluctant to discuss it, so I didn’t press him. He seemed to have had an almost vehement hatred for wartime nostalgia – and probably with good reason.
He didn’t mind talking so much about the aircraft, and my understanding is that they simply flew them off the deck – there was no special “lauch” equipment – afaik.
a store called ‘fcuk’ that only sells clothes
More knowledgeable than I, I thought it was something to do with football 😀
However, don’t let my comments put a halt to discussion on the subject 🙂
Evening PL
Rather gone off football after last night. Meant scan some more of my Dad’s pics (hence comment about Spits 🙂 ) but keep getting distracted.
Still can’t workout how some people manage to put annotations between attachments in their posts…?
Such posts are of pictures hosted on another website and cross posted using the “Insert Image” button (when you post using the “Go Advanced” button, rather than quick post it is a button looking like a mountain against a yellow sky with a dark circle in the top right hand corner). This brings up a prompt in which you can put the website address of a picture hosted (stored – not necessarily visible) on another site – or webspace.
It can be done manually using the [ img ] website address/imagename.jpg [ / img ] tags in quick post. Such pictures do not NEED to be condensed – but condensing is good, because you can’t see more than 72dpi on a computer monitor anyway.
Following their Stage One Pass announced in December 2003 the Heritage
Lottery Fund (HLF) have agreed the grant to VTS which means that when the partnership funding is in place, the VTS Trustees can give the go ahead for restoration to commence.
I interepet that to mean that S2 has now been reached, and the funds are in place for restoration to commence.
There will always be safety checks and balances that need to be in place before, and during here years flying – and – yes the harsh reality is that if she fails inspection at any time she will be grounded (either temporarily or permanently) – BUT that is true of any and every aircraft in service today and is no more, or less of a barrier, in practical daily terms, than it is to a brand new Boeing 747 or an ageing Edwardian Boxkite (recognising, of course, the difference in scale, ergo cost). I fail to see the point in bringing up what is, in my view, a whorey old chestnut. Because exactly the same can be said of every other aircraft.
when can we expect XH558 to be in the air on the airshow circuit again. Probably only then will we believe it
Shorts
I’d give it 18-24 months – there’s a lot to do – and just look how long it is taking to get the seat harnesses for the SeaHawk.
A lot can happen in 10-15 years – who knows what is going to happen then, it is merely a position that is held now, and may, or may not, be changed nearer the time for her final retirement. It is far to early to engage in speculation as to where she is finally going to end up now, in my view. We can have that debate 8-10 years from now (or later).
They needed a credible, recogniseable, location for the suits, no doubt. In 10-15 years time, Bruntingthorpe may well be the place most people recognise as being the home of Cold War Jets – but the public barely know of it’s existence. Duxford is regularly televised, has probably the most well known aviation museum in the country, and is therefore relatively well known.
Let us merely rejoice that S2 has been reached, the funds will be released and VTTS are finally in a position to continue with her re-assembly to flying condition.
It is blindingly obvious that the CAA will need to be satisfied (and, no doubt, a host of other organisastions) that she is in flying condition before she’ll be allowed to take to the air – it is simply a pointless, defeatist remark to bring it to any kind of attention – again, in my view.