dark light

octavian

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fuselage Painted! — Mk XII Hurricane #809985
    octavian
    Participant

    Good call, and I sort of fell for it

    in reply to: Fuselage Painted! — Mk XII Hurricane #810232
    octavian
    Participant

    I am slightly puzzled by the fuselage roundel colours. On the masked photo it states a red centre, white, blue and then the yellow outer, however, the finished roundels appear to my eyes to have a blue centre, white, red and then the yellow outer. Or is it because it’s April 1st?

    in reply to: Whitley / Wellington crash Pebworth Worcester ? #855534
    octavian
    Participant

    From Bill Chorley’s Bomber Command Losses Volume 7:

    P/O A J Fawcett RCAF
    WO1 J W O’Brien RCAF
    F/S F A C Macauley RCAF
    P/O H Casimiri RCAF
    F/S D H Halstead RCAF
    AC1 L Holloway
    AC2 D McMillan

    Hope this helps.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go (2016) #884422
    octavian
    Participant

    Regarding post 100 – “Is it a Wellington?”. I thought it might be an Albermarle, but on closer inspection agree that it’s a Blenheim.

    in reply to: At Gatwick Aviation Museum the aircraft start to go inside #923624
    octavian
    Participant

    I find it faintly ironic that there should be such restrictions placed on the museum’s development when there are so many large structures in the adjacent area; and probably many more if the expansion of Gatwick Airport comes to fruition. Baffling.

    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #889314
    octavian
    Participant

    I rather think that otis has hit the nail on the head. Whilst I’m not generally fond of remakes, perhaps it would be no bad thing to bring some of the modern film making skills to the story. We do tend to view the original Dambusters film through rose tinted specs; just wondering what it would be like with 3D specs?

    in reply to: Vulcan Last Flight? #847338
    octavian
    Participant

    Forgive my cynicism, but Maid Marian International is not exactly the busiest airport in the UK. I can’t help but feel that they are making something of an issue of the “final flight” and its impact upon their customers’ passengers. Why not just work on the basis of their quietest day and encourage the enthusiasts to come in their thousands, pay to get on site and enjoy the spectacle. It might just keep them solvent for the month.

    in reply to: Hunter Flying Again Now #893878
    octavian
    Participant

    I would suggest that the continued operation of Hunters by military operators indicates that the CAA’s response to the Shoreham accident, grounding the type for civil operators, owes more to pandering to the press than to rational and substantive assessments.

    in reply to: Douglas Bader's pre war MG sports car up for auction #893942
    octavian
    Participant

    The chassis number on the TA series was stamped into the near side (left hand) front dumb iron on the chassis, slightly above and behind the front spring mounting. Even on a restored chassis this should be discernible. It would be worth checking this out. This number is also replicated on the makers plate affixed to the front of the under bonnet toolbox on the left side facing forward.

    I do note that the photos of this car show it with side laced wire wheels (19″); 1938 models (post chassis 1770) were fitted with 19″ centre laced wheels. A picky point, but……..

    There are very few cars of this age that have not been subject to some form of restoration. How original is original? No matter how sympathically this car has been restored, the reality is that Bader’s bum did not grace the (new?) seats and, like so many Spitfires (Supermarine), I would suggest that much of its provenance is based on the chassis/makers plate.

    It may well make big numbers, but the pleasure of owning one is in using it. I shall watch with interest.

    in reply to: Chariots of Fire FW190 landing incident #918748
    octavian
    Participant

    So many people talk about a “replica” in a derisory way. Surely, every subsequent production model is a replication of the original? That makes every subsequent airframe a replica. As Tango Charlie has commented, the Northern Aeroplane Workshop Sopwith Triplane, and others, have a validated provenance. Why not this FW190, the various Me262s as well as the other aircraft recreated around a makers plate, or, as in the case of the Elvington Halifax, a variety of components. Just enjoy the pleasure of seeing them and don’t get so hung up about origin.

    octavian
    Participant

    From: Bomber Squadrons of the RAF, Philip Moyes (1964). “From Jan 1943 to 1951 or thereabouts the sqn used the code letters HW”. This appears to co-incide with 100 re-equipping with Lancasters.

    in reply to: 83 Squadron Manchester crash 26 March 1942 #861472
    octavian
    Participant

    Source: Bomber Command Losses 1942 W R Chorley

    Manchester 1 R5831 OL-I T/O Scampton 2040 Ops to Essen.

    Sgt E M Price
    F/S R C Snowball
    W/O P R Thompson
    F/S M C Roberts
    Sgt J A Devalle
    Sgt H G S Garnham
    Sgt S Block

    While returning to base, and shortly after crossing the Kent coast near Sheerness, the Manchester flew into a barrage balloon cable. Out of control, the bomber crashed 0210 at Warden Point on the Isle of Sheppey.

    in reply to: AVRO-NAPIER long range bomber #863529
    octavian
    Participant

    Avro 549 Aldershot

    in reply to: Why Have We Heard of the Boulton-Paul Overstrand? #884275
    octavian
    Participant

    Creaking Door: You are most kind.

    in reply to: Why Have We Heard of the Boulton-Paul Overstrand? #884652
    octavian
    Participant

    Morning all,

    Looks like I took my post a bit too seriously – sorry about that Creaking Door: too much Miles Merlot I fear. Indeed, why have we heard about the Overstrand? As you have suggested our awareness of it is far greater than its importance. No, I haven’t a clue either!

    As for the Avro Alderhot, with two prototypes and 15 production aircraft, this large single engined, biplane heavy bomber had its first flight in 1922, entered service with 99 Squadron in 1924 and appears to have left service in 1925, being replaced by the Handley Page Hyderabad (38 aircraft), which lasted in front line service until 1930. (Source: Aircraft of the RAF since 1918 Owen Thetford 8th edition 1987)

    Perhaps we should be grateful that Gloster wasn’t based in Norfolk and tempted to use local names. Mind you, I do feel that the Gloster Garboldisham would have had a certain ring to it, and as unpronounceable at the Happisburgh.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)