dark light

19kilo10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 782 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: QEC Construction #2002485
    19kilo10
    Participant

    I think I’v made my opinions about the abortion the CVF is well known here. I will say that if it were up to me, the RN would have two 60000 ton three catapult CVs in service or on the way (perferably three ships) , each with a standing air group of three fast jet squadrons (Rafale would be my first choice but SH would do) one of helos, and an AEW flight. (Hawkeyes) that is as far as I’m going to go tonight cause you dont even want me to start on what the RAF should have, or the British Army for that matter. Suffice to say that it really really pains me to see how far the British have declined. And if you disagree……fine.

    in reply to: QEC Construction #2002494
    19kilo10
    Participant

    That one opinion.

    in reply to: Kawasaki C-2 and KC-390 #2282053
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Could the C-2 even be competative next to the A400?

    in reply to: Ford gets an island #2002568
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Bow section in place.[ATTACH=CONFIG]215645[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2282165
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Sea Vixen….again![ATTACH=CONFIG]215643[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Kawasaki C-2 and KC-390 #2282167
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Could C-2 be a danger to A400M sales? I wouldnt think they would.

    in reply to: F-35 path to UK entry into service. #2282281
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Will there be more than one FAA squadron? Or just 800?

    in reply to: ARE the US Navy's super carriers a relic of wars past? #2002686
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Two British ships were hit by air launched Exocets (out of five launched) one missile (hit Sheffield) failed to detonate. Neither ship launched countermeasures (Shef was just …….off.) and Atlantic Conveyor had none. Glamorgan was hit by a land launched MM38 and suffered damage to her hanger and loss of her chopper but continued with her mission. Coventry was hit by good ol iron bombs.

    in reply to: ARE the US Navy's super carriers a relic of wars past? #2002782
    19kilo10
    Participant

    And probably would not have happened had the British had a big deck CV with AEW.

    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2239784
    19kilo10
    Participant

    It is debatable I suppose.

    Just that the J-79 in the Mirage III airframe as the Kfir was not, initially anyway, a match made in heaven. Fatter, heavier, and needed extensive revising of the cooling situation, not the least of which was additional scoops.

    Certainly initially, there were performance losses, with some Israeli pilots lamenting it’s performance compared to their Mirage C’s and Neshers with the lower powered ATAR 09C. It is worth pointing out that the later ATAR 9K50 and J-79 have pretty much the same twr.

    When looking at an engine for the Kfir, the ATAR 9K50, Spey, and J-79 were all considered.

    The J-79 won out primarily due to maintenance and spares inventory, as the F-4 Phantom was used in large numbers by Israel, and military credits could also be availed of.

    Cheetah C and Kfir both have a similar theoretical max load too, although to emphasise, it is theoretical.

    I completely agree………between the two it probably comes down to the pilot…..and personal preference. I’m wondering what the Spey would have done for the airframe?

    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2239991
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Due to engine integration/cooling/drag…

    …this probably is.

    http://i1268.photobucket.com/albums/jj563/venoid/cheeta011.jpg

    A very debatable call. I’ll stick with the Kfir. J79 bestows greater wet thrust (17900lb v 15873lb) higher speed (1516mph v 1460mph) and greater weapons load. Not at all sur on the range, but the Kfir’s combat rad of 477nm is not too bad. But again, a very worthy debate. Maybe a new thread should be started?

    in reply to: ARE the US Navy's super carriers a relic of wars past? #2002878
    19kilo10
    Participant

    I’ll throw one last little bit of info out there………during the Falklands conflict, the Argentine 25 de Mayo TG got within 100 miles of the British carriers without being detected despite there being two of the best SSNs in the world looking for her. Her being only 20000 tons and not 90000 was irrelevent. The ocean is very very big and unless you know where to look or get somewhat lucky………you just may get a nasty shock.

    in reply to: Jaguar and Mirage F1-AZ cpmpared #2240245
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Are those V3B or Magic?

    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2240328
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Maybe someone should start an F-4 and Draken thread, seeing as how this is a Mirage III and F-104 thread.

    in reply to: ARE the US Navy's super carriers a relic of wars past? #2002886
    19kilo10
    Participant

    The problem is not as much, if the Soviets have really detected the Midway group, but the statement that the lack of detection (in peacetime!!!!!) would prove that the carriers are a useful weapon system. Which is not a very logical argument. It is not improving the argument that it is only based on the reports of one side, i.e. it is not even known, if the Midway group was really not detected.

    I think Jonesy made a very logical argument.

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 782 total)