Did any IIIs ever get an M53? Or RD33?
The ultimate Mirage III mod!
The Mirage really got it together once it got the 104’s engine!:diablo:
Its sad that posters here just do not remember what the cold war was like.
Would it be accurate to say the Marines started to get more independence when they went for the A-4M instead of the A-7?
Sweet
Thanks for the info. Kinda sad to see what has become of the SAAF in the last 17 years or so…….
Well…….Im ex Army, but I have noticed that Marines and their supporters are the most deffensive of types…….just cant stand it if you dont agree with them and wont be satisfied until you shut up. Its funny…..so easy to push their buttons!:D
But anyhow……I would say the Marines, while technicaly part of the Navy, have grown more and more independant of them in the last 20 years or so, and are now all but an independant branch of service.
😀
QF-35 :p
Would be interesting in “Red Bull” colors!
Do SAAF Grippens have BVR missiles?
I wouldn’t think having an academy makes the USCG superior to the UMSC.
Why would you think the USCG is superior to the USMC?
Sounded quite reasonable to me. Navy journals in the 80s were big into discussing operations under EMCON conditions. And the Sovs ALLWAYS trailed CVBGs with “trawlers” or had aircraft snoopers in range……..so if they werent being tracked by the task force, they werent around and it was safe to assume the CVBG was undetected.
Thats an EXCELLENT article jonsey!!!! VERY informative! But……..although it makes perfect military sense the statement ” not getting into a war of attrition with an enemy who’s logistics base is close at hand while yours stretches back thousands of miles” is kind of exactly what the US Navy did to Japan in WW2. Just a thought.
As I understand it the USMC is a co-equal force under the Dept of the Navy, rather than the USMC ‘belonging’ to the USN. From what I can tell USMC officers hold high command positions within the CAG, rather than the USN holding all the cards and calling all the shots.
One way to look at it would be to see that there is the USMA at West Point, the USNA at Annapolis, and the Air Force Acadamy at Colorado Springs. There is even a Coast Guard Acadamy and a Merchant Marine Acad. So it really cant be said that the Marines are a “co-equal” branch of the armed forces.
What new air assets and/or technologies would allow a smaller (say 65k ton) future carrier to accomplish what a larger current CVN does today? Or at least close the gap sufficiently to counter some of the ratio’s mentioned in http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2011-09/supercarrier-not-superfluous?
I think I much agree with the conclusion of http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a227420.pdf
Very interesting arguments he has there. and I tend to agree with him about SCS. However……..there is simply no chance of the US Navy getting or asking for funding for this type of vessel as the navy brass would see it as a threat to the funding of the large CVs.