dark light

19kilo10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 782 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ARE the US Navy's super carriers a relic of wars past? #2003518
    19kilo10
    Participant

    It would be very interesting to see all the data gleaned from the SINKEX on USS America.

    19kilo10
    Participant

    So now we get back to the “bigger vs smaller” carrier argument which has been going on since aircraft first went to sea…..and I might add that the small carrier argument has never won out…….:mad:

    19kilo10
    Participant

    THAT is the CV killer! Something like a MK.48 ADCAP goes off under the keel of a CVN…………finished.

    19kilo10
    Participant

    An Exocet?! Please!

    19kilo10
    Participant

    So no savings for the escorts, in fact, probably an increase in spending on escorts in order to maintain a level of protection that would make the small CVs survivable? Also……..what kind of battle damage could these small flattops take?

    19kilo10
    Participant

    Is there a breakdown on the actual cost of an F-35A as opposed to an F-15SE?

    in reply to: Jaguar and Mirage F1-AZ cpmpared #2287140
    19kilo10
    Participant

    How much of a performance boost would there have been if they SAAF had re-engined the AZ with the RD33?

    in reply to: USMC sqns on USN strike carriers. #2003809
    19kilo10
    Participant

    The Marine Corp is part of the Navy. All Marine aviators go through the same flight training as Naval aviators.

    in reply to: Jaguar and Mirage F1-AZ cpmpared #2290649
    19kilo10
    Participant

    They do look similar.

    in reply to: General Discussion #241509
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Very few local, city, or state PDs train with duty ammo. Very few Sheriff’s departments train with duty ammo. That’s because they have to buy their ammo based on local city, county, & state budgets. None of those agencies you mentioned are Federal, they don’t get their ammo from DHS.

    Training with low powered target ammo teaches officers bad habits and doesn’t adequately prepare them for proper use of duty ammo. POA/POI is different between target and duty ammo so you either have to use estimated offsets or you have to zero your sights for target ammo, and then zero again for duty ammo when you are done training. Most officers don’t do that, they just alter their point-of-aim for the low powered target ammo and reinforce bad habits that are very likely to cause more missed shots when their lives depend on it. Follow up shots are more difficult with the higher powered duty ammo and that will also cause more missed shots because they aren’t properly prepared for it.

    The point of my last post was that DHS has many agencies and hundreds of thousands of people working for them. This ammunition purchase is a multi year deal that allows a large agency to lock in best prices for an extended period and ensure there is a steady supply to cover their estimated yearly requirements. The U.S. Coast Guard is now part of DHS, and they used to buy ammo in 5 year contracts. Now they will get their ammo from DHS. The Coast Guard has about 40,000 people between active duty and reserves. The Secret Service is under DHS, as is U.S. Customs & Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, FEMA, TSA, and the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. Many of these rounds will be used for training by FEMA first responders who have to go into areas right after a natural disaster and help secure infrastructure and restore services, and don’t forget the Federal agents who are guarding our nuclear facilities and other critical infrastructure. These people do train with duty ammo, and most of them don’t get enough time at the range. Last year the U.S. Marshals Service reduced the number of rounds issued for training to 1000 per year per Marshal. That’s a bare minimum to keep a person proficient for a whole year. The smart ones usually spend a lot of their own money each year on training ammo. (And in their case, by training ammo I mean the expensive high-powered hollow points that they carry on duty.)

    TO SUM IT UP:
    Local, City, State PDs & Sheriff’s Departments generally DON’T train with duty ammo. (BAD Training, but saves money.)

    Federal Agencies generally DO train with duty ammo. (GOOD Training, but expensive.)

    Police & Sheriffs have to live within their budgets or else they will have to lay off officers and people will get fired.

    The Federal Government doesn’t.

    The military kinda does this…..when I was in the Army (M-1 tank crewman. 19k10 mos) when we went to gunnery we fired blue tipped training rounds out of the main gun. In late 90 while deployed for Desert Shield we fired our first “warshots”, black tippped rounds. There was a VERY noticable increase in the violence of the recoil with those things!

    in reply to: U.S.A Second Amendment re-think #1841160
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Very few local, city, or state PDs train with duty ammo. Very few Sheriff’s departments train with duty ammo. That’s because they have to buy their ammo based on local city, county, & state budgets. None of those agencies you mentioned are Federal, they don’t get their ammo from DHS.

    Training with low powered target ammo teaches officers bad habits and doesn’t adequately prepare them for proper use of duty ammo. POA/POI is different between target and duty ammo so you either have to use estimated offsets or you have to zero your sights for target ammo, and then zero again for duty ammo when you are done training. Most officers don’t do that, they just alter their point-of-aim for the low powered target ammo and reinforce bad habits that are very likely to cause more missed shots when their lives depend on it. Follow up shots are more difficult with the higher powered duty ammo and that will also cause more missed shots because they aren’t properly prepared for it.

    The point of my last post was that DHS has many agencies and hundreds of thousands of people working for them. This ammunition purchase is a multi year deal that allows a large agency to lock in best prices for an extended period and ensure there is a steady supply to cover their estimated yearly requirements. The U.S. Coast Guard is now part of DHS, and they used to buy ammo in 5 year contracts. Now they will get their ammo from DHS. The Coast Guard has about 40,000 people between active duty and reserves. The Secret Service is under DHS, as is U.S. Customs & Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, FEMA, TSA, and the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. Many of these rounds will be used for training by FEMA first responders who have to go into areas right after a natural disaster and help secure infrastructure and restore services, and don’t forget the Federal agents who are guarding our nuclear facilities and other critical infrastructure. These people do train with duty ammo, and most of them don’t get enough time at the range. Last year the U.S. Marshals Service reduced the number of rounds issued for training to 1000 per year per Marshal. That’s a bare minimum to keep a person proficient for a whole year. The smart ones usually spend a lot of their own money each year on training ammo. (And in their case, by training ammo I mean the expensive high-powered hollow points that they carry on duty.)

    TO SUM IT UP:
    Local, City, State PDs & Sheriff’s Departments generally DON’T train with duty ammo. (BAD Training, but saves money.)

    Federal Agencies generally DO train with duty ammo. (GOOD Training, but expensive.)

    Police & Sheriffs have to live within their budgets or else they will have to lay off officers and people will get fired.

    The Federal Government doesn’t.

    The military kinda does this…..when I was in the Army (M-1 tank crewman. 19k10 mos) when we went to gunnery we fired blue tipped training rounds out of the main gun. In late 90 while deployed for Desert Shield we fired our first “warshots”, black tippped rounds. There was a VERY noticable increase in the violence of the recoil with those things!

    in reply to: MiG-29 vs F-15 #2292736
    19kilo10
    Participant

    It would mostly depend on the pilots.

    in reply to: Jaguar and Mirage F1-AZ cpmpared #2293228
    19kilo10
    Participant

    Did the SAAF ever use pgms off the F.1AZ?

    in reply to: General Discussion #241839
    19kilo10
    Participant

    I would imagine that the SKs really wouldnt need too much help defeating NK. It would be a horrible mess, regardless, but I have no doubts about the outcome.

    in reply to: Are We Slowly Slipping Into World War? #1841382
    19kilo10
    Participant

    I would imagine that the SKs really wouldnt need too much help defeating NK. It would be a horrible mess, regardless, but I have no doubts about the outcome.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 782 total)