dark light

tenthije

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 4,177 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: VC10 AND RB211s #576813
    tenthije
    Participant

    I think that for such a small fleet of out of production planes, even 20 years ago, the economics simply do not add up. It is not just a matter of bolting on two new engines. The cockpit will also need to be changed frmo 4-engined to 2-engined. This also means changes to the plumbing. This also means changes to the wiring and let’s not even start with the paper mess of certifcation.

    Such a procedure is really only worthwhile for large fleets such as the USAF KC-135s as well as the numerous civilian DC-8 cargo/VIP planes. Also, the 707/DC8 conversion was less cumbersome as they stayed with 4 engines.

    in reply to: Back In business ( 1 photo Only ) #444654
    tenthije
    Participant

    Without having access to the EXIF date I am gonna bet you had the ISO rating very high. For a longish exposure with tripod that is really not necessary. Just put it down to 100 (or lower if you camera can). That will remove all the noise in the photo.

    For this photo some aggresive neat-imaging can do wonders as well, but the tarmac will remain noisy.

    http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/2533/policeheliborderfilterera0.jpg

    in reply to: KLM MD-11s #578775
    tenthije
    Participant

    Hi,

    A few question for you KLM enthusiasts.

    • Do KLM MD11s have PTV’s?
    • If not, are there any plans to?
    • Can anyone confirm that KLM are using MD-11s on their twice daily service to Dubai (DXB/OMDB)?

    Thanks in advance,

    Sam 🙂

    No IFE on the MD-11s, and I do not know of any plans to install them either. The MD11s are mostly used on low yielding routes so the incentive to kit them out with the latest and greatest is small. Besides, as mentioned the planes will start leaving the fleet in 5 or so 6 years.

    I have checked for todays flights and both DXB flights are with 772s. They do have PTV and a fantastic one at that.

    in reply to: LAX 6/11/2007 #445002
    tenthije
    Participant

    What’s happening to the restaurant behind the Fiji?

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v728/PaulChandler/DQFJK747AIRPACLAX6Nov20070172.jpg

    in reply to: Where Next For FR? #580799
    tenthije
    Participant

    I am willing to bet that within a year Ryanair will base two or more planes at Eindhoven.

    New legislation has passed that allows wider opening hours for airlines, as long as the planes are based at EIN. This is valid for no more then two airlines to please the NIMBY’s at least a bit.

    Ryanair is the only airline that has publically stated their intent to open a base, but did not want to do so as long as the opening hours where as strict as they where. The new legislation removes that burden, and allows two planes to be based later to be expanded to four.

    Who the second airline will be to base planes at EIN is unknown. My best guess is VLM as Eindhoven is a large business city (Phillips, DAF trucks a bit further south). Also; Denim Air, the owner of VLM, is based at EIN as well so it would be logical. Other options include Transavia, KLM Cityhopper and of course the option that no second airline will base at EIN.

    As for the routes, I do not know. I am hoping for Berlin.

    in reply to: SAS Q400 u/c collapse at Copenhagen #582976
    tenthije
    Participant

    Do you think KLM Cityhopper would give there some of there Fokker 50’s that they dont use for lsd?

    James

    Perhaps, it is true that they got a few spare frames. The reason they got the spare frames is because KLM does not have enough pilots. Now if even KLM has a problem with pilots, togethern with VLM one of the largest F50 operators around, then how is SAS going to man them?

    in reply to: SAS Q400 u/c collapse at Copenhagen #583232
    tenthije
    Participant

    And here’s Bombardier counter-statement to SAS’s statement that they would retire the dashes.

    http://bombardier.com/en/0_0/pressleft.jsp?group=0_0&lan=en&action=view&mode=list&year=null&id=7924&sCateg=3_0

    Bombardier Statement Regarding The Sas Decision On Its Q400 Aircraft Fleet
    Toronto, October 28, 2007

    Bombardier is disappointed with the SAS decision to permanently discontinue flight operations with the Bombardier Q400 aircraft given that the landing incident is still under investigation by Danish authorities.

    While SAS chose to ground its Q400 turboprop fleet following the incident on October 27, 2007, Bombardier’s assessment of this situation, in consultation with Transport Canada, did not identify a systemic landing gear issue. Based on this we advised all Q400 aircraft operators that they should continue with normal Q400 aircraft flight operations. Further, Bombardier and the landing gear manufacturer, Goodrich, have completed a full review of the Q400 turboprop landing gear system and results have confirmed its safe design and operational integrity.

    Bombardier stands behind the Q400 aircraft. Since entering revenue service in February 2000, the Q400 turboprop has proven itself to be a safe and reliable aircraft with over 150 Q400 aircraft in operation among 22 operators around the world. To date, the fleet of Q400 aircraft has logged over one million flying hours and 1.2 million take-off and landing cycles.

    in reply to: Asia trip Kuala Lumpur Pt.2 (VERY LARGE POST!) #446228
    tenthije
    Participant

    Excellent photos! That looks like a great spot too! Is that place hard to get to? Might be something for in a year or 2 when I got some more money.

    in reply to: SAS Q400 u/c collapse at Copenhagen #583236
    tenthije
    Participant

    Interesting side-note I just remember. Last thursday I saw a ARJ-85 (SE-DJ*) next to the paint shop at Eindhoven. It had SAS colours, but no titles. Might be the answer to above question on what SAS will no do.

    *edit*
    someone at A.net mentioned that this plane is going to Transwede, not SAS Commuter. Photo here:
    http://www.skyliner-aviation.de/showphotos.main?LC=nav2&SkyID=43e6baa7964bef8bacee5eaf6d28ba45

    in reply to: SAS Q400 u/c collapse at Copenhagen #583237
    tenthije
    Participant

    Not surprisingly after so many incidents SAS has decided to retire the DHC-8 from their fleet. Announcement at SAS website:

    SAS removes Dash 8 Q400 from service permanently
    Following the recent period of events involving aircraft of the Dash 8 Q400 type, SAS’s management, following an unscheduled meeting of the Board of Directors held today, has decided to immediately discontinue services based on the use of this type of aircraft.

    “Confidence in the Q400 has diminished considerably and our customers are becoming increasingly doubtful about flying in this type of aircraft. Accordingly, with the Board of Directors’ approval, I have decided to immediately remove Dash 8 Q400 aircraft from service,” says Mats Jansson, President and Chief Executive Officer of SAS.

    In January 2000, SAS was the first customer to use the Dash 8 Q400 in its traffic operations. The aircraft have accounted for approximately 5 percent of the Group’s passengers. The aim is to replace traffic based on the Q400 by reallocating current aircraft in the SAS Group’s fleet and by means of leasing.

    http://www.sasgroup.net/SASGroup/default.asp?ID=946

    I wonder what they will do now. Getting new planes on short notice, especially 20odd, will be hard. And what are the alternatives?

    • ATR: full order book.
    • CRJ: yeah, like that’s gonna happen. LOL
    • EMB170: full order book.
    • ERJ: not quite as economical and lacking seats.
    • F50: not enough available second hand.
    • F70: not available second hand.
    • RRJ: too long till in service date.
    • S2000: definately not enough available second hand.

    And who in their right mind would want to buy a fleet of planes that are now well known as trouble. Sure the more recently delivered planes will probably be sold quickly. But the earlier delivered planes, those are gonna be hard to get rid of.

    Next to that there will be schedule disruptions and very expensive (short notice) leases. Who will pay that? Could Bombardier be given those charges? I can imagine that Bombardier will not want to do that. Especially considering that SAS as a customer is a lost cause anyway.

    in reply to: General Discussion #299915
    tenthije
    Participant

    The thrid audio file on the website you linked to (the 17 min file) contains the audio file. The other two files are of some Finnish guy talking about it? I do not speak Finnish either so not sure what is going on there.

    Since I do not speak Finnish I can’t tell if it is the full interview or just bits of it. It is not just Hitler though, also some high ranking Wehrmacht officers. For some parts there is quite a bit of background noise from the dinner.

    -edited to add-
    This is certainly not the full interview as the audio suddenly drops mid-sentence. Whether more is available but not online, or the rest has gone lost I do not know.

    in reply to: Hitler – Mannerheim recording #1924626
    tenthije
    Participant

    The thrid audio file on the website you linked to (the 17 min file) contains the audio file. The other two files are of some Finnish guy talking about it? I do not speak Finnish either so not sure what is going on there.

    Since I do not speak Finnish I can’t tell if it is the full interview or just bits of it. It is not just Hitler though, also some high ranking Wehrmacht officers. For some parts there is quite a bit of background noise from the dinner.

    -edited to add-
    This is certainly not the full interview as the audio suddenly drops mid-sentence. Whether more is available but not online, or the rest has gone lost I do not know.

    in reply to: Asia trip 2007: Jakarta (LARGE POST) #447777
    tenthije
    Participant

    The 737 with dreamlinver livery. Is that a 739ER? The door layout is diffent then normally. Normally there are 4 exits per side but this one has an extra exit just aft of the wing.

    in reply to: New colours and logo for České aerolinie/Czech Airlines #585486
    tenthije
    Participant

    Looks better then expected. But the logo does remind me of something else. It looks a lot like the Smint logo as well as a sports logo I can’t quite seem to remember the name of.

    in reply to: Some Russian Types At PIK #447925
    tenthije
    Participant

    Am I right that lately PIK has been getting a whole lot of An-225 flights? Photos of the beast seem to be uploaded here quite often lately. Any reason for that? (not that I mind, always great shots)

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 4,177 total)