dark light

Rod Blievers

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chipmunk WP929 in silver – any pictures out there? #939895
    Rod Blievers
    Participant

    Roobarb – can you post the photos you get from the 8 AEF people please?

    in reply to: Chipmunk WP929 in silver – any pictures out there? #940183
    Rod Blievers
    Participant

    TonyT:

    Looks the same scheme bar the 8 AEF badge

    Not quite – WD353 is in a short-lived Birmingham UAS scheme (of identical vintage to 8 AEF’s scheme).

    What I’ve never noticed before is that while both WD353 and WG417 are in the overall Light Aircraft Grey scheme, both have white canopy frames!

    I’m intrigued by the timing of the LAG scheme. Polyurethane LAG paint effectively replaced the cellulose High Speed Silver paint in 1966, yet the “take up” rate on the Chipmunk was very slow, with only a handful appearing in this scheme around 1969. The first documentation I’ve located thus far regarding this scheme is DH’s Mod H.293 dated June 1970, yet by then the first variant of the Red/White/LAG was already appearing at 2 FTS, Church Fenton!

    Thoughts anyone please?

    Cheers,

    Rod.

    in reply to: Two part Chipmunk question. #943138
    Rod Blievers
    Participant

    Radarsdesk – the drawings are pure gold! PM sent….

    in reply to: Chipmunk Restoration Question #1085654
    Rod Blievers
    Participant

    wk165 – next time you’re looking at the remains of C1-0039, VH-UEK (ex WB587) could you do me a favour please? Does the data plate (either on the front cockpt seat pan or rear cockpit bulkhead) read DHH.f.42 or DHB.f.42? There is some suggestion that it was not a Hatfield built (a DHH plate) aircraft.

    Thanks,

    Rod.

Viewing 4 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)