Firstly, I’m not on a “high horse”, it only looks that way to you because you’re on a donkey. At least your donkey understands the IP and ToT issues involved for a project the US would consider as embodying several 6G technologies. Have I not provided you with the evidence? Your donkey understands the time, effort and money that the Russians spent developing these and will simply not hand them over lock stock to the Indians, not for any price. The sooner you cut the flag-waving and come to terms with this fact the better.
There was a time (several years ago) when I myself thought Indian money was crucial to the PAK-FA programme, I have since changed my mind as demonstrated with their civil expenditure programme pre-2020, and that this is no longer the case. You obviously missed the finer nuances of that post (though that’s a regular thing with you on this thread).
However, you reserve the right to believe the scooter and his RFJ ‘journalism’, but then your beliefs will be utterly devoid of reality- incidentally, a root cause of your incessant whining.Do you remember when it was reported that Dassault wanted more french production and less indigenous because they believed HAL was not up to scratch? and hence could not provide a warranty? They’re reticent over ToT and the plane’s nearly 25 years old!! Even your donkey cringes when it reads articles about the “much stealthier FGFA will be compared to the PAK-FA with its all-metal body”, one seat? two? R U sure? Why was it that HAL initially proposed surrendering 20% workshare and now it’s suddenly spun into Russian deviance?
Your likely next PM, Narendra Modhi, is a highly intelligent and pragmatic man. I’m sure he’ll make the right decision on the FGFA (to ‘codevelop’ on Russian terms, buy FMS or neither) and for the right reasons.
Donkey has a big di*k, which many fancy to have but simply can’t.
Why India should ‘codevelop’ on Russian terms? What is there to ‘codevelop’? As of today, price estimate is US 200 millions per plane and which will move more north. Like you said, I am saying from the very start Russia is not going to give any serious technology so why to bother putting money in the hole. What sort of partnership where you expect other to shell out 50% of development but don’t lay claim on IP or technology. I have to applause … you way of thinking.
Don’t you ever get tired of being stupid? That same friggin RFJ article again!!! and you claim not to be a troll!!
The Sochi olympics just cost the Russkies a whopping $51bn!! then there’s the World Cup ($?bn), Moscow metro expansion ($30bn), Moscow-Kazan high speed rail link ($29bn) these are just a few of the civilian higher profile govt. funded projects and they’re ALL PRE-2020!!! Do you honestly think they can’t scrape together India’s $5.5bn for Putin’s big willy project?Rkumar, nice to see you’ve stopped crying now that you’ve found your own source that concurs with what I posted above regarding high-quality supply chains, indigenous skills and capabilities etc. If the Indians attain the said 50% capability only in 2030, that’s hardly the Russians’ fault, is it? To be brutally honest, that number will never rise above 25% (imho) – if the F-35 is any precedent. Also, your cost estimates are too simplistic as the final numbers have probably not been set and do not include basing infrastructure, weapons, operating/maintenance costs etc.
First of all get down from your high riding horse and it will be better if you don’t lecture us at least of Russian high quality supply chain. Others points are debatable as Russia has certain capabilities and skills. I am not interested in finger pointing and fighting mine is bigger then yours sort of discussions. Simply not interested.
These costs are without any operating or maintenance costs. I am not sure regarding weapons. Even if weapons are included in this price, what could be the weapons cost? US 2-3 billions or 10 billions. To me it is clear that India will pay at least double of the US 100 million considering inflation, project completion delays and technology transfer delays. It is nothing specific to Russia, I am just stating facts for a complex project like T-50.
It is my opinion that India should go slow with any foreign 5th gen plane procurement plans as they will be very expensive to acquire, technically complex to maintain and quite expensive to operate.
My stomach does that when I’m hungry.:D
Thank you for pointing out … I don’t know from where L jumped in during copy n paste and highlighting text.
India’s Share in Joint Fighter Project With Russia Likely to Grow
Positive talk but lets see if Russia walk based on the talk. Another point to note end price of each plane will be US 200 million as of today’s estimates. (144 planes will cost US 25-30 billion)
MOSCOW, October 25 (RIA Novosti) – India’s share in research-and-development work for the joint Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) project with Russia is currently limited by India’s domestic industrial capabilities but will gradually increase with the project’s implementation, a Russian military expert said Friday.
India’s The Economic Times newspaper reported on October 17 that Indian military officials were concerned over the country’s work share in the FGFA project, which is currently only 15 percent even though New Delhi is bearing 50 percent of the cost.
According to the paper, India’s defense minister is expected to raise that issue during his visit to Russia beginning November 15.
“The figure cited by the Indian side reflects current capabilities of India’s industry, in particular the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited [HAL] corporation,” said Igor Korotchenko, head of the Moscow-based Center for Analysis of Global Arms Trade.
“With the progress in the implementation of this project, we expect the Indian engineers and designers to approach the share determined in the [Russian-Indian] agreement: 50 percent,” Korotchenko said in an exclusive interview with RIA Novosti.
Russia will certainly provide all necessary knowledge and logistics support to Indian specialists, but developing skills and acquiring experience in design and development of advanced fighter aircraft takes a long time and substantial effort, the expert added.
The FGFA project began following a Russian-Indian agreement on cooperation in the development and production of the perspective multirole fighter, signed on October 18, 2007.
The Indian fighter jet will be based on the Russian single-seat Sukhoi T-50 or PAK-FA fifth-generation fighter, which now has four prototypes flying, but it will be designed to meet about 50 specific requirements by the Indian Air Force (IAF).
In December 2010, Russian state arms exporter Rosoboronexport, India’s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited and Russian aircraft maker Sukhoi Company signed a preliminary design development contract worth $295 million for the new aircraft.
Currently the $11 billion final design and research-and-development contract is under negotiation between the two countries. The total program is expected to cost India about $25 billion to 30 billion.
The IAF had initially planned to order 166 single-seat and 48 twin-seat fighters, but India’s chief of air staff said in October last year that New Delhi would now go for only 144 single-seat jets, with domestic production slated to begin in 2020. :stupid:
….
Anyway, I never understood India’s apologist foreign policy. Not interested in derailing this thread, which is clearly not about India.
…. What?
Considering current Indian shipbuilding rates, it might take over a decade for two frigates to reach the Philippines after cutting steel.
If the Philippines are serious about buying frigates they should look to South Korea. I don’t think India has had experience in exporting warships before, certainly nothing as complex as a frigate
Did I claim otherwise? If you read carefully, I used word prospect Regarding order or time lines etc. only future can tell us … lets see.
What you guys say does not compute..
Take a long hard look at the MKI and the exellent shared Development and history between Irkut and HAL.If you can’t read or Google about the MKI, then let me refresh;
Irkut recieved a very high requirement sheet from IAF’s New Heavy Class Interceptor/multirole fighter.
First India ordered a few batches Su-30K, then Su-30MKI straight from Russia, after a while they got Kits, which HAL got to work on. Further Down the road, HAL produce airframe parts and some systems. And they got their own Engine division where they overhaul the AL-31FP engines.What India WILL get from the FGFA is Kits transfer. No doubt they get to make certain parts and a few systems as well.
Now is this not better than just ordering it up from oversea.. exactly like any F-35 deal would happend??Eighter way, it seems like a LOT more than LM can ever offer India/HAL.
Several other member here has voiced their point of view about Indias big mouth when it comes to the FGFA program.
I do not think India will pay up $5.5 Billion eighter, this is just old News still floating about..India is way off the Board here, they should have joined the Pak-Fa/FGFA program years ago.. in fact they should have joined it back in 2002, if you mean they must share everything Down to 50/50%
Now i do not know why HAL didn’t.. and neighter does anybody else here. But For India to come around in 2013 and demand their “fair share” is silly and completly off any realistic radar.. its not how Things work in the real world.
Sukhoi has frozen its design and are two years away from starting their Pre-Serial Production of the T-50’s..
Now go figure..
So two groups, Russian group (small mouth) is suggesting India will be wasting its resources on PAKFA as it is too advance. That is what Indian group(non world class, big mouth) says, it is too advance for us and lets concentrate on LCA Mk2 and AMCA, which are low technology. 15% Indian work share is a lot and we don’t want to slow down Russia with PAFKA, so it is better for everyone if Russia develops it alone and let us make a deal like Su-30 MKI. So why everyone is getting upset. At the end both are saying same thing. Or am I missing something? Do I?
^ I can’t put better then this.
+100
Why do not India supply lethal weapons to any of those countries? On the same principal, we should protest.
It makes sense for India to let Russia develop it alone and sell it to whoever they wish. In stead we put this money on LCA-Mk1 production line, LCA Mk2 and AMCA development.
We can buy 144 PAKFA when Russia feels to sell it to us with so called ToT aka partnership.
BTW …. This time, we should get ready for next cry from China :applause:
Philippines eyes 2 frigates from India
Good to see India’s prospect of exporting military hardware for first time. Salute to Indian Navy for taking the lead in developing indigenous systems. I hope Indian Army and Indian Air Force follow it.
There’s no crying, protesting here. Its standard practice to lodge of note of dissent when arms exports take place to an entity that you’re not on the best of terms with.
India for example, regularly put on the diplomatic equivalent of a grimace on the matter of any arms exports to Pakistan. The reaction from Pakistani commentators was predictably similar to yours.
Its just the way things are done, neither the Filipinos nor the Koreans, nor for that matter the Chinese, will give it a second thought.
Why our thinking is always Pakistan centric, can’t we think or act bigger? I do not see India issuing such public statements when China sells arms to Bangladesh, Maldives, North Korea, Nepal, Sir Lanka, Burma or to African nations.
In case, India do issue such statements kindly point me those. Please don’t tell me we did it in private in apologist way. Thanks in advance.
Philippines eyes 2 frigates from India
Good to see India’s prospect of exporting military hardware for first time. Salute to Indian Navy for taking the lead in developing indigenous systems. I hope Indian Army and Indian Air Force follow it.
Why Chinese Govt. always cry and protesting like a spoiled child?
They are doing the exactly same, sell or gift weapons (lethal, non-lethal or WMD) to their client states (North Korea, Pakistan) or other nations(Iran, Syria, Turkey, African countries).
They are sh!t scared even if someone sells knife to Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam and now Philippines also. Is Philippines also comes under core interest? It seems their core is always getting bigger and bigger as time pass.
That’s stealing 32m for Su-34 and even less for Su-30. (We could have bought tens of tens of Su-34 at that price)
Thanks for clarification.