dark light

MiGMan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 265 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MiG-29 Baaz questions #2405578
    MiGMan
    Participant

    hiya guys!

    thanks for the replys! very interesting! 🙂

    will the Indian cockpit upgrade be more akin to the SMT or the SM?

    I’m working on a model of an Indian fulcrum; modeling the upgrade that’s meant to begin this year is tempting!

    hanging R-77s on it seems a 50/50 issue though!

    no pics show an Indian mig-29 with the missile or associated pylon…but lots of secondary evidence = hard decision!

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #13 #2439668
    MiGMan
    Participant

    iraqi vampires

    http://i37.tinypic.com/2s9y49h.jpg

    http://i35.tinypic.com/ru4qc8.jpg

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2435911
    MiGMan
    Participant
    in reply to: Red Eagles: book opinion? #2435991
    MiGMan
    Participant

    I seen other pics of -23MS with red-stars in private archives only.

    cheers for the neat photos, esp the lat, which i haven’t seen! 🙂

    seems blue 86 got re-branded red 86: and is still around somewhere in Ru

    http://i29.tinypic.com/33nbxp4.jpg

    in reply to: Red Eagles: book opinion? #2436244
    MiGMan
    Participant

    Where and when ?
    Do you know details – which units, when where they operational with the -23MS etc…. – or is it your idea only(“because”) ?

    all the evidence ive seen posits that the soviets never operated the type as a line unit; all the pics/video/written accounts refer to the type in soviet service with training rounds

    from what i read the only soviet units operating the mig-23MS were:

    4th TSBP – Lipetsk

    bishkek/tokmak, mostly likely part of:

    “5th Central Course of Preparation and Training of Aviation Personnel (Bishkek, Kirgiz SSR) [5th TsKP i UAS]. It’s main duties was training of foreign pilots and aviation personnel. The center was equipped with 430 aircraft and helicopters (incl. 100 MiG-21 and 100+ L-39), and controlled 5 regiments:
    – ? UAP (Bishkek)
    – ? UAP (Kant)
    – ? UAP (Lugavaya) [equipped with some MiG-29]
    – ? UAP (Tokmak)
    – ? UVP (Bishkek)

    in reply to: Red Eagles: book opinion? #2436658
    MiGMan
    Participant

    hey pesho!

    im guessing the soviet mig-23MS pilot you know was part of the training group based at Tokmok/Tokmak, in now Kyrgyzstan?

    From what ive read it seems the soviets only operated a handful of the type for training foreign 23MS operators?

    in reply to: Red Eagles: book opinion? #2436665
    MiGMan
    Participant

    hiya

    sorry haven’t read your strike eagle book,but probably was a good call not to go too technical on this book, can always do it in the next 😀

    (btw the involvement of the red eagles in Somalia was something i was completely unaware of, but really fascinating, if there are more examples of this with other nations, would make for good reading!)

    just sent you a PM on here with my email address

    btw, someones built up a collection of red eagle models (cant remember which show):

    http://i27.tinypic.com/333fnl5.jpg

    regards

    in reply to: Red Eagles: book opinion? #2436684
    MiGMan
    Participant

    Thanks for the feedback, MiGMan.

    Would be interested in knowing why you feel this way (genuinely). I didn’t think that the text would give the impression that *all* MiG-23s were the same; and I thought I had treated the different MiG-21s and copies individually.

    This is definitely something I can look at if you can present some specific examples that you have picked up on.

    hiya!

    not trying to sound nit picky, and i do realize perfectly well the info may not have been available, but from an honest curiosity point of view when reading the stories (if the info becomes/is available) would loved to know whether the pilots were referring to the mig-21F,or the MF/bis in their recollections. Its a very small thing, but would add to the accounts

    (similar sort of thing when authors write about the Falklands and refer to mirages and daggers as just “mirages”, its kinda a bumber as aviation enthusiasts always love to know specific types 😀 😀 )

    No, it would not have.

    In the first place, it was researched from scratch, required a significant amount of relationship building to get people to open up, and called on more than 80 hours of interviews – all things that Mr Gordon is not renowned for.

    In the second instance, this book is a collection of anecdotes – I did not present it, and do not pretend that it is, a technically-impeccable book about data, statistics and side-by-side comparisons. I would love to have written such a book, but the reality is that it would not have been accessible to the wider audience. It is what it says it is: a collection of stories that, to the best of my ability, I have tried to weave together to tell the story of the squadron.

    im not at all doubting your strenuous research effort, and, on reflection, probably did miss the point of the book 😉 (and I KNEW yeffim would a bad example 😀 ) i was more thinking along the lines of “what would of been really cool, on top of..” to see a small part of the book look at the comparative difference in mindsets, opinions between a WP pilots impression and a US pilots impression, or say an author whos worked a lot on the soviet side of things comment on the US pilot impressions compared to their research on soviet opinions, was more what i was getting at 🙂

    BTW if you ever find out the bort number of the afghan Su-22 the US acquired, i can provide the basic history behind the ac if you want 🙂 *pretty sure it was 804, but 2 defected, so could be one, other… or both!)

    All the best!

    in reply to: Red Eagles: book opinion? #2436968
    MiGMan
    Participant

    Anyway, I`m glad that someone raised this question, bcs after reading this book the majority of adolescent aviation freaks is thinking what a piece of $hit the Mig-23 really was.

    sadly that view is already pretty well entrenched outside fo those with russian ac interest 🙁 while the very early versions may be deserving of the rep (i prefer “colourfull” 😀 ) the mid to late versions certainly weren’t dud aircraft, and the ground attack variants have more than proven themselves over many different wars!

    a book like this would of benefited from being co written by someone like yeffim Gordon (i know some will groan, but i cant think of a another author!) 😉

    in reply to: Red Eagles: book opinion? #2437160
    MiGMan
    Participant

    On the other side it does show, that the US pilots did show little understanding about the way a MiG-23 was operated or the author was looking for selling claims at first. 😉

    hiya!

    I too read the book and came to the same conclusions! great accounts, and certainly a great insight into the horrors of the 23MS (stands for mega S**t? – but i still love it ) 😀

    problem i found is it seems to take these accounts and applies it to Mig-23s in general (similar issue with call F-7s and Mig-21s a generic “mig-21” ), in that regard it disappointed me, as i was hoping for more insight vs anecdotal tales.

    overall a great first into to the subject, im looking forward to a more comprehensive companion in future years though 🙂

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2437410
    MiGMan
    Participant
    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2439516
    MiGMan
    Participant

    some new shots of old somali ac 😀

    http://www.panoramio.com/photo/18466805

    http://www.panoramio.com/photo/18466710

    http://www.panoramio.com/photo/18466584

    http://www.panoramio.com/photo/18466367

    http://www.panoramio.com/photo/18466457

    angolan

    http://sentinel.projects.googlepages.com/C314inSWA.jpg

    interesting top down shot of Angolan mig-23….showing like Ethiopian and Iraqi examples, there seems to be a pattern of marking top left wing, bottom right wing with the national roundel

    http://i44.tinypic.com/1sawl5.jpg

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2441029
    MiGMan
    Participant

    Tanzanian F-6A and F-6B and a JJ-6 😀

    http://benwilhelmi.typepad.com/benwilhelmi/2009/04/tanzanian-air-force.html

    http://i44.tinypic.com/1erxms.jpg

    http://i39.tinypic.com/nmaqhd.jpg

    http://i42.tinypic.com/x4hmrr.jpg

    http://i43.tinypic.com/16isc43.jpg

    http://i40.tinypic.com/16isktd.jpg

    and Mig-21MF or bis:

    http://i43.tinypic.com/2s8h45l.jpg

    http://i43.tinypic.com/2s8h45l.jpg

    http://i42.tinypic.com/23jrhqb.jpg

    in reply to: AF447 (Merged) #543096
    MiGMan
    Participant

    very tragic and mystifying at the same time! :S

    of related interest there are ROVs capible of operating in up to 6000 meters, so depending on how fast the debris field can be guesstimated – might be a chance to find the boxes!

    pity it didn’t end like air transat 236 🙁

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2479456
    MiGMan
    Participant

    my first contribution to #12!!

    nigerian pics, with notable mig-21bis in 3 tone camo! 😀

    source: http://www.supoojo.com

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 265 total)