Thanks all for your responses.
Thanks guys.
I believe that the Tattershall Thorpe site was pretty well cleared out some time ago and was wondering where HC went from there.
The Wings of Eagles site just mentions a stored Whirlwind without giving details so I have emailed and asked the identity.
BR
Laurie.
XP328 is still there according to a photo on http://www.demobbed.org.uk
This one….?

Sahin and Swerve, regarding your doubts as to the accuracy of Al’s statements.
I have seen this myself many times. During the early 1990’s Turkish F-4s REGULARLY flew from Incirlik (usually as 2 pairs), fully bombed up. We were told they were actually armed at Incirlik, and went on to bomb targets in Northern Iraq (presumably PKK).
We always found it very peculiar that we were deployed there to enforce a UN no-fly zone, protecting the civilians in Northern Iraq, whilst a NATO ally was being given support (fuel and weapons) to be able to attack the same people!
The description of said Cat in John Cooper’s post reminded me that a similar logo had been painted on the LH intake of Phantom ZE352 at some time during its career. ‘352 was based at Wtm, if that has any relevance.
It doesn’t look much like a Lightning flying away from you so much as a rather rude rendition of a strutting tom:D
If anyone can shed any further light on what it is meant to represent (apart from the obvious) and who might have painted it and why, I’d be interested to hear.
Anyway, here it is (apologies for the poor quality and thread hijack):
Anon.
Similar to this one?

Courtesy of 74 eng facebook page
Incident happened about 1430/1500 yesterday, both crew ejected and are safe. Aircraft reported to be ZD792, coded 138, of XV(R) squadron.
Most certainly not the aircraft in the video the BBC have – They’ve been had!
ZD792 isn’t coded 138
It will be interesting to know which airframes have been selected from AMARG for conversion. I will be interested in researching their former life with the USAF.
Which of you is the RAF getting?
None of them.
All 3 are recently active frames. From http://www.ukserials.com they are
RJ18/18773 ZZ664 Rivet Joint Ex USAF KC-135R 64-14833
RJ19/18778 ZZ665 Rivet Joint Ex USAF KC-135R 64-14838
RJ20/18770 ZZ666 Rivet Joint Ex USAF KC-135R 64-14830
It’s not all doom and gloom, a whole THREE additional brand new serials have been allocated (for “Rivet Joint” according to http://www.ukserials.com)
Although these look like some kind of Arthur Daley second hand specials….
My apologies if this is covered earlier in this very long thread, but I read that the IAF was close to buying the Typhoon over F16, F118, and Rafale. Is that foul rumour or close to the truth?
Checck out this Reuters post:-
http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USLDE6A605T20101107
Europe’s Typhoon jet leading India deal race-paper
Sun, Nov 7 2010
LONDON, Nov 7 (Reuters) – The Eurofighter consortium, made up of Britain, Germany, Spain and Italy, is leading the race to win a 7 billion pound ($11.3 billion) deal to supply 126 Typhoon fighter jets to the Indian Air Force, the Sunday Telegraph reported.
The Typhoon, produced by Britain’s BAE Systems (BAES.L: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz), Italy’s Finmeccanica (SIFI.MI: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) and pan-European aerospace firm EADS (EAD.PA: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz), topped the Indian Air Force’s technical assessment of bids, beating the American F16 and F18s, Russian MiG 35 and France’s Dassault Rafale, the report said.
If the Eurofighter jet wins the deal, India would become the consortium’s third-largest customer and an unofficial fifth partner in the project.
“The Indians would be one of the biggest users of Typhoon, which would give them a vote at the table,” the paper cites an official as saying, adding that the findings have been forwarded to India’s defence ministry who will make a final decision in “the next few months”.
Eurofighter representatives were unavailable for comment when contacted by Reuters.
(Reporting by Rhys Jones; Editing by Erica Billingham)
I would be very interested if anybody has photos of XX977, she spent a fair bit of time as an instructional airframe at St Athan.
Thanks Paul
I found this one:-
I dont think it’s XZ364 as this is still a complete airframe… More like a cockpit has been painted up to represent this aircraft. Anyone on here to confirm this?
I can confirm that XZ364 is not a complete airframe.
Simple question, and probably difficult to answer! 55 for the F-15S, but which for the F-15C?
RSAF 2 Wing, King Fahd Air Base, Taif
5 Squadron, McDonnell Douglas F-15C/F-15D Air Defence Fighter
34 Squadron, McDonnell Douglas F-15C/F-15D Air Defence FighterRSAF 3 Wing, King Abdul Aziz Air Base, Dhahran
13 Squadron McDonnell Douglas F-15C/F-15D Air Defence Fighter
92 Squadron McDonnell Douglas F-15S Strike Interdiction/AttackRSAF 5 Wing, King Khalid Air Base, Khamis Mushayt
6 Squadron, McDonnell Douglas F-15S Strike Interdiction/Attack
55 Squadron McDonnell Douglas F-15S Strike Operational Conversion
34 Sqn seems to operate many more Ds than Cs, whereas 5 and 13 only have a handful of Ds each.
A Google search brings up a Wolverhampton Aviation Group report from the Orlando Area
http://www.wolverhamptonaviationgroup.co.uk/trip_central_florida.htm
Phantom AP’s list the aircraft as FG Mk. 1 and FGR Mk. 2 and the F700 as FG1 and FGR2, hope that helps;)
Absolutely correct. The full stop is only there on the APs because it is the abbreviated version of the word “Mark”. If the word “Mark” or “Mk.” is ommitted, then there is obviously no requirement for the full stop.
Same thing, but technically there should be a full stop between the role designation letters and the Mk. number, ie FGR.2.
In fact there should really be a full stop between all of the role designation letters and the Mk. number, F.G.R.Mk.2 (Phantom Fighter Ground* Recconnaisance Mk.2), but it has to be said that it dosen’t read that well written like that!*As in Ground attack!
Mmm.. Not sure about that.
I have just checked various official documentation, and there is NEVER a full stop between them when it is abbreviated in that format. There are certain AP chapter and page titles which would have a full stop when fully described (as in this case) Phantom F.G.R. Mk.2, but those are few and far between (and the dot there is just because the word “Mark” is shortened to “Mk.”).
In F700s and other MoD and RAF documentation it is always FGR2. In various enthusiast books and websites etc it is often FGR.2, but not in any official writing that I have seen.
I accept that there may be some exceptions around, but the vast majority of evidence I have seen points to it being FGR2, and I reckon it is just the enthusiast community that may have added in the dot.