After Olympus stopped making SLRs I started buying Canon because the were the best I could afford. I’ve never been disappointed and I still use Canon both for stills and video.
Who makes Sony lenses? Their video lenses are made by Zeiss and they’re definitely inferior to Canon lenses.
Regards
Sony’s top lenses are all Zeiss and are equal to if not better than any Canon offering. Their “G” Lenses were originally Minolta – the old ‘uns will fit all Sony’s cameras, although the latest ones are, I believe Sony’s. Bear in mind that Sony acquired the rights to Minolta so they draw heavily from their experience and expertise. The 70-400 “G” is recognised as being the best in class – probably.
And yes I do shoot Sony!
A lot of people are biased towards Canon and Nikon because the Sony Alpha range is aimed at the enthuasist and those new to DSLR photography and because of that they are dismissed as being a bit basic.
I seem to do alright with my Sony Alpha and there are plenty of models in the range to chose from depending on your budget and there are pleny of lens available, from Sony/Sigma/Tamron, to fit them.
Brian
I’ll second that, don’t dismiss Sony.
This has to be mine, a case of being in the right place at the right time. Fortunately the outcome, although resulting in injury to Mike, was not serious. If it had been the image would not have been chosen.
Perhaps a reminder to us all that airshows do not always go to plan and the risk has to be calculated, that is why the CAA take it so seriously.

I’m surprised the Hurricane caught fire, that looks suspiciously like asbestos in the second shot – although looks can be deceptive. 😮
Also in yesterday’s West Australian. Quite a surprise to see them a while after the event.
World wide coverage I see! I did offer them on the day to the Daily Mail and they didn’t use them! I wanted to be sure that Mike, the pilot was going to be OK before offering them to an agency.
What camera, settings etc did you use?
SONY A900 and SONY 70-400 SSM G Lens, ISO 400. The first in the crash sequence were taken at 160mm, 1/320 @ f10 or f11 – The last few after the accident were at 400mm, all shutter priority. 1/320 was in use to get the prop blur of the Pawnee tug.
The advantage of the A900 is the image size – 6048 x 4032, so there was lots of option to crop; I used a shorter focal length to ensure shots were sharp. When things are happening fast there is not much time to be concerned about zooming, knowing it can be cropped is very comforting.
I was wondering the same as several papers in the UK published them today.
I hope all published them with your consent.
As far as I know the following papers have published the shots:
The Times, Telegraph, Mail, Mirror, Express, Sun, Evening Standard, Metro, The Scotsman and the New York Post. Also been shown on ITV London News and Meridian TV; BBC Breakfast also made quite a fuss. Not sure of Swiss papers, I may need to look into that! My local paper also featured them.
I thought we were all in agreement about waiting for the AAIB to publish their findings, it would appear I’m mistaken.
I sent all my images to the AAIB on the day of the accident to assist with the investigation. I am also sending a set of hi-res images to Guy Westgate of the Swift Aerobatic Display Team.
I am retaining copyright however.
Rob
I was late for the show on Saturday, along with many others judging by the traffic so I guess I saw more than those in the airfield. I must admit to missing the Frecce Tricolori, haven’t seen them for many a year, let’s keep fingers crossed for 2011.
Looking at the youtube footage that accident is weird?
The commentator said the tow rope went slack, which is a problem for the pilot, and a couple of seconds later the tow parted. The AAIB will sort it out no doubt.
Was the pilot OK?
Apparently yes, I heard he suffered some minor fractures.