From my collection The Hon Mr’s Victor Bruce’s Blackburn Bluebird. Photographed at Sealand c1930.
John
In Images of Aviation, a BN history. It states that the float development was shelved. The floats fitted to the main u/c and to two bridge pieces running under the fuselage. Never flown.
John
I can never look at photos like these without thinking “how many of those poor baskets made it out of there”. I visited Changi Jail a short time ago.
John
Well if the result is the photo, pretty impressive I would say 😀
John
Mike thanks for the offer. I have Vols 1 and IV. I thought you might appreciate this one.
Cheers
John
Tim
Thank you this is precisely the info I wanted. I have loads of DH and Tiger related material but not this impressment log.
Thanks again.
John
And a very odd roundel position on the fuselage.
John
Bump. For the Tiger.
Coming back to this one. This (and do I understand others) was found in Croydon. It could be that they were test or development propellers and disposed of through ADC at Croydon where huge numbers of aeroplanes and components from Ex goverment stock were marketed in the early 20’s for next to nothing.
John
The DH Derby flew in 1922 at Stag lane but it is usually shown with a four blade prop and it has quite a low thrust line.
John
A back track on this . The Okapi used a four blade prop so of all the possibles I think that you are looking at an early Horsley as the other contenders used four bladers. The problem is the HP shown as the Condor IA is a nominal 650HP and the Horsley didn’t fly until 1925. The Westland Yeovil and Avro Aldershot are early contenders ,the Aldershot flying in 1922. both used two blade props.
John
At 1921 and 620Hp this is quite early. Horsleys usually had II’s or III’s. The Condor was fitted to a lot of esoteric types and as this is low HP how about a DH.14.
John
I think Low’n’Slow is on the mark. I forgot that many Cirrus engines have right hand rotation. So Avian, Bluebird or Moth perhaps.
John
Avro. I’m pretty sure it is a 504A and although I can’t find it’s serial I feel it might be a contraction of F4171 (quite common) which was a rebuild (possibly by No3 Western Aircraft Depot) and I feel is a school aeroplane
Though which school I don’t know, as yet.
John
I think that it has very little Supermarine provenance. It’s certainly an early prop and with the low power slim hub possibly pre first war. Most of the early Supermarine designs favoured
four blade pusher or tractor props. It’s the wrong blade shape for the PB.9 IMO.
The hub markings would solve it.
John