dark light

TMor

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 1,365 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2365829
    TMor
    Participant

    I don’t know the Gripen very well (to me, it’s the “little Rafale” that Germany and France could have designed), but I think Typhoon is still lagging behind Rafale and Gripen.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2365845
    TMor
    Participant

    Omni-role(rafale) and swing-role(gripen, EF) is the same capability. Its the ability to change roles fast when needed to. Its a more mature form of multirole.

    No.
    Mirage 2000C was “multi-role” but required reconfiguring while on the ground (i guess there are much bette exemple though)
    F/A-18 was swing-role and could handle air2air and air2ground in a single mission.

    Omni-role is swing-role and a strong (if not total) multi-role capability.

    Please, do not reduce the effort it is to integrate every modes and weapons to the aircraft. I don’t want to be called a fanboy, but I have yet to see a Gripen or a Typhoon in charge of all the missions Rafale is about to cope with… I’m not saying Gripen/Typhoon will never be able to do the same, but they will need more time, more money, just like everybody !

    in reply to: Will France buy F-35C!? #2379275
    TMor
    Participant

    😀

    Pathetic ! No problem with you Loke.

    France will not buy F-35C but we already operate a CATOBAR fighter. Thus, the choice of a CATOBAR fighter by UK would make sense for interoperability.

    This is the only explanation I found.

    in reply to: Neuron Demonstrator flying? #2380969
    TMor
    Participant

    In the second video :
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3naYhi-lCU

    The man says that one year before the first flight (early 2012), they will start taxiing tests.

    in reply to: Hot Dog Typhoon thread III #2381114
    TMor
    Participant

    This is not a fair analysis. It’s only a marketing document. We have to choose carefully the articles we want to comment upon.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2382919
    TMor
    Participant

    Rafales chances in India is virtually ZERO .Source FT….

    Not only for Rafale, don’t you think ?

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2385065
    TMor
    Participant

    France has given a new name to the AASM :

    HAMMER
    .

    Article by Robert Wall on Aviation Week

    The INS/GPS-guided version is the SBU-38 (SBU=Smart Bomb Unit)

    The laser-guided version is the SBU-54.

    The INS/GPS/Infrared-guided version is the SBU-64

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2391085
    TMor
    Participant

    Yes…
    http://rafalenews.blogspot.com/2010/09/garuda-iv-rafale-was-there.html

    In addition, Rafale will go to India :
    http://rafalenews.blogspot.com/2010/09/rafale-goes-back-to-afghanistan.html

    It is also worth noting that the Charles de Gaulle will take part in exercices with the Indian and Saudi Navies before going to Afghanistan.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2392960
    TMor
    Participant

    I don’t know what you call F4… If you’re talking about an eventual stealthier mid-life update/redesign, you might be true. LoL

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2393916
    TMor
    Participant

    Rafale, younger than Gripen NG ?;)

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2394095
    TMor
    Participant

    Look 3 messages above. 😉

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #4, Cachorro-quente! #2396886
    TMor
    Participant

    Looks like Pepe ran away and hide when questioned on that FAB papers, and it could be that he dreamed up the whole theory all by himself.

    Yes, of course. Dream whatever you want. 😉

    Question : would defending his PoV be worth the effort for PP Rezende ?

    He may simply have much more to do than wasting hours here, trying to convince those who simply can’t accept what he wrote.
    To me, it seems that he’s done all he could do.

    in reply to: Rafale CFT´s #2396909
    TMor
    Participant

    Incredible, you found a 9 years old thread !!! :D:D:D

    For the CFTs, no one paid, nothing happened.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2398570
    TMor
    Participant

    Rafale international is indeed what you say but the forum that you are referring to is not that, it is the “international rafale forum” and as far as i can see it has nothing to do with Dassault, Thales or Snecma

    :rolleyes:

    You said :

    For the Rafale please type:

    http://www.dassault-aviation.com/en/…esign.html?L=1

    I know that this is only a detail. It is also highly unprofessional for an organisation trying to sell a 60? million euro thingy on the open market.

    In my answer I gave you the following links :

    There had been a http://www.rafale.co.kr and a http://www.rafale.com.sg

    There are :
    http://www.rafale.com.br/

    http://www.rafale-schweiz.ch/

    I thought there was one for Greece, and I don’t know for India…

    The link to MY forum is in my signature, not in my answers. I wasn’t talking about my forum when I wrote :

    Thanks. It shows that Rafale International can communicate in different languages !

    I was talking about the links above (Brazil, Switzerland, Greece… South Korea, Singapore…)

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2398708
    TMor
    Participant

    where does it say that this is a site managed by Dassault?

    😀 Just read :
    The consortium Rafale International includes Dassault, Thales, Snecma. It is written everywhere.

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 1,365 total)