i think its GaN TRM that makes 50% more output at given input over Si TRMs
This have nothing to do with the older PESA range, due to its not solid state Si.
Thales claims a 50% range increase from PESA to AESA (AsGa). That’s all.
He have presented some sources and all
A source claiming that the hardware work is minimal.
An hypothesis (“old pesa backend, nothing new”) based on a wrong interpretation of the source and which ignores many other informations as those we provide him with.
THUS, a flawed conclusion.
His only real edge is that Thales don’t care about his opinion, and don’t provide us with information that the public is not supposed to know about. So, he can invent everything he wants, because we won’t always be able to prove him wrong with a Thales brochure saying “RBE-2 AESA is multi-beam capable”.
F/A-18E is a good fighter, but not as advanced as Rafale. That’s my conclusion. Why ?
Look at Boeing website : they never wrote SH is “omnirole”. You can’t counter my claim.
He’s doing the same from the begining. Remember the story of Spectra’s arrays… He has been implacably incredulous only because of of his prejudices, and even with 3 sources to prove him wrong he still had difficulties to accept he was wrong.
What should we hope then, if he build his argument where information is void ?
If people start intentionally to bring lies and all here in their argumentations, like they are used to do on SP (where some people seems to know more about the test results of Mica than MBDA employees for example), what are we supposed to do ?
Ignore them ? And let the readers think they are true because no one counterdicts them ?
I could also add that the SH’s canopy, if open, doesn’t protect the cockpit from water. Prove me wrong. I’ve a source to prove that the Rafale’s canopy does prevent water to enter the cockpit even when opened.
(don’t waste your time, I don’t think what I wrote in italic, it’s just for the example).
Sign In
