Thank you.
What’s left for the shared developpements ? 😀
Capitaine Romain (Rafale pilot) gives his point of view about the events against the F-22 :
According to him, because BVR doesn’t rely on pure airframe performance, US pilots refused the BVR engagements and prefered the dogfights (it seems to confirm that the US pilots were unwilling to show their radar).
At this game, the heavy F-22 demonstrated superb capabilities, but at the cost of a high fuel consumption due to low speeds.
None of the two aircraft demonstrated a superiority over the other. No details were given because pilots know that dogfights depends on a lot of factors.
So, the Grandclaudon’s story about dogfight isn’t really challenged. The only remaining problem is about the BVR part.
France denied it happened.
I thought USA too.
A&C say it happened.
Air & Cosmos have come back on their previous statements.
They only challenge AdA on the BVR part of the F-22 vs Rafale story (there were no BVR according to our AdA, officially). I’ve not read the article, but according to them, after the dogfights, US pilots were surprised by the ability of the Rafale to resist the Raptor, though the Rafale has no TVC.
When our MoD had to sign the order in 2004, the flyaway price was around €45 M.
It hadn’t changed in 2007.
http://rafale.freeforums.org/a-topic-about-programme-costs-t7.html
I’m not sure we can conclude about what it is NOW. 😎 The only thing i’m sure about is that the quote production has increased by 3 to 4Bn for a lower number of aircraft… !
Thus, yes, the flyaway price should have increased too. But i’m not sure we’re far from the €55M price.
the link doesn’t seem to work in firefox, use IE instead 😉
It works very well with Firefox. Stop this M$ lobbying ! 😀
A question though. Isn’t VAT paid by foreign customers too? (i ‘ve no idea).
No.
Wait, i check…
Good question. It seems that countries members of the European Union are not exonerated ! 🙁
http://www.douane.gouv.fr/page.asp?id=349
I think 101M would be thw number for customers. 142M is the number including development costs.
Those figures include VAT.
So, basically, the current cost of each Rafale with support and including VAT, should be 142 M, while the fly away isn’t disclosed. Correct? Which is what a customer should expect to pay too, i suppose.
Thank you.
142 is what France pays (the whole France, including industrial part, no only tax payers) WITH VAT.
Tax payers pay €112M per aircraft (without VAT which is paid and recovered as soon by the State).
This include a R&D that a foreign customer shouldn’t pay for.
I think that depending on the package, €84M (101 without VAT) is the minimum foreign customer should be asked for…
But our industrial want a margin, and to recover their R&D share ! (€2Bn)
So… IF the foreign customer wants the same packages than France (simulators, spares etc), it should pay :
€84M per aircraft + a part of the €2Bn R&D industrial share + weapons + commercial margin + everything i forget.
The problem is that i really doubt that a foreign customer will want exactly the same package….
Is this fly away?
I don’t think so.
Actually, the programme is divided in two parts :
R&D + production
Production includes the aircraft, simulators, maintenance means and spares. On the basis of what was published in 1999 :
61 percents of the production total cost was for the aircraft (C B M) ;
25 percents for the spares ;
12 percents for the industrialization process ;
<1 percent for maintenance means and simulators.
Thus : the €142 M is the current unit programme cost in 2010 prices.
The flyaway remains undisclosed, but I PERSONNALY expect them to be around €60M (60 percent of the production cost (€101M) as explained above).
Note that in its last report in 2004, the Cour des Comptes published figures with VAT, and i see no reason why it would have changed.
So THE reasons for selecting the Rafale have nothing to do with the merits of the plane itself…
He wrote “is not only about”. Not “is about everything but”.
However, i’m honoured to see that each time, Rafale become the target of just nearly everybody.
Eurofighter, Gripen, Super Hornet, F-15K/S… They all have a big problem with our aircraft merits… If we just had to read and hear, then, except in France, Rafale would be a not so good but very expensive aircraft. Fact is that it gives hard time to its competitors each time. I really wonder why.
Who’s next ?
Question: What makes a claim that the Rafale had 6 WVR engagement and only lost 1, more credible a claim that in 2 WRV engagement and lost both times?
Wrong question.
It seems that there has been several kind of engagements there.
WVR gun only, and BVR. Both were described. The first by LtCol Grandclaudon, the latter by A&C.
AdA prefered to talk about the most pleasing part, A&C shed the light on the other.
However, both seems to agree on another fact.
Oh ! Evil Rafale didn’t score a single point ?
Sorry…
(this demotivator is not dedicated to forumers here)
Not that much… It’s a very familiar situation for anyone interested in the Rafale and its tribulations. 😀
+1000 :D:D:D
😮

“Counter intuitive…”:D