dark light

TMor

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,365 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • TMor
    Participant

    So, during the dogfight session, only one kill for F-22, during the BVR session, they got close enough to finish with cannon.

    Especially since the Rafale had no idea where to look, the Raptors might have come close by surprise. But in gun dogfights, the RoE may not allow this surprise trick.

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2393888
    TMor
    Participant

    Congratulations to the French!

    Thanks, but nothing has been signed yet.

    TMor
    Participant

    Second thing that is new to me:

    The previous French declaration said that Rafale had only been locked by Rafale once during the six dogfights. This article said that Raptor had killed Rafale twice at least during the dogfights without much difficulty.

    This is what i thought first.
    But to be exact, we don’t know if they were talking about the same event. We don’t know if they only know what they are talking at all. It looks like a Rafale vs Mirage 2000 BVR fight.

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2394666
    TMor
    Participant

    Thanks Sign, i really love this kind of documents.

    in reply to: Roll Rate . . . #2395811
    TMor
    Participant

    high-aoa behavior

    Why regaining energy if you loose less at AoA ? :D;)

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2397577
    TMor
    Participant

    Gripen NG is technically enough, Sweden offers a very good (the best ?) ToT, and it is cheap.
    Hard to beat. Dot.

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2397618
    TMor
    Participant

    i understood that russia had won the libyan deal. .

    … that Russia had won “a” libyan deal. Not “the”.
    Trust me, if we Rafale loose this deal, our (french) newspapers won’t dismiss it.

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2400910
    TMor
    Participant

    it also says that the F22 clearly dominated the rafale in BVR. In fact The F22 didn’t used its radar and when rafales had to turn it on to look for them they were able to track them silently.

    VERY interesting !:o

    TMor
    Participant

    The curious thing is TMor f.e., knew for EF’s rebuttal a month or two before I got the mail, but kept silent like a fish. LOL, fanboysm…

    Sorry, what ?

    TMor
    Participant

    No and I don’t care who he is. What I want to see is someone puts him money where his mouths are (signed and verified by legal, not-private, entities), like Eurofighter GmbH did.
    So, EF GmbH (which is legal entity) clearly endorsed a certain position which is in context, conflicting with French Lt.Col’s.
    OTOH, neither AdlA nor Dassault endorsed his position and you’re welcome to produce documents which prove different.

    Extract from “Dassault magazine” number 144, Winter 2009/2010, page 3.
    http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/3051/dassaultmagazinen144hiv.jpg

    Vous pourrez lire, dans ce numéro, un article qui a fait grand bruit dans la presse aéronautique mondiale : il s’agit du compte-rendu rédigé par un pilote d’essais anglais après son vol sur Rafale, à Istres. Ce pilote, renommé pour son expérience, confirme ce que nous savions tous, à savoir que notre avion est excellent. Cette conviction est corroborée par les exercices interalliés auxquels participent les Rafale de la Marine et de l’armée de l’Air depuis plusieurs années. Le mois dernier encore, une confrontation internationale a eu lieu aux Emirats, qui a permis de démontrer la supériorité de notre appareils face au Typhoon de la RAF. Bref, il est de plus en plus évident, aux yeux de tous les observateurs avertis, que le Rafale fait référence.

    You can read in this issue, an article which caused quite a stir in the media world aviation: this is the report written by an English test pilot after his flight Rafale at Istres. This driver renowned for its experience confirms what we all knew, that our plane is excellent. This belief is borne out by the allied exercises involving the Gust of the Navy and the Air Force for several years. Just last month, an international confrontation took place in the UAE, which has demonstrated the superiority of our equipment against the Typhoon of the RAF. In short, it is increasingly evident in the eyes of all observers warned that the Rafale refers.

    So, yes, Dassault endorsed the results.

    TMor
    Participant

    TMor,

    I only correct the untruths.

    No, you do not only correct the untruth. You also post the nonsenses about Rafale you hear in your company. Just like if i was polluting Typhoon threads with all what i hear about Typhoon… :rolleyes:

    I still manage to make a lot more positive comments about Rafale than you’ve ever made about Typhoon.

    Firstly : LoL. You still manage to make a lot more negative comments about Rafale than i’ve ever made about Typhoon.

    Secondly : there is a very simple reason to the fact that i rarely post comments on Typhoon at all (i decided to stop long ago) : i very rarely post in Typhoon threads unless i have something to ask, since i consider i don’t know Typhoon well enough (this is why i appreciate Scorpion). I have enough job with the Rafale, and i’ve no interest in posting qualitative comments on Typhoon (and ideally, on Rafale too !!!).
    I created the “Rafale news” thread so as so give this forum a thread about Rafale, with articles and also translations of articles which would not be available to all if some French weren’t here. The only reason for which i would quote one of my “anonymous” sources is when i think it can bring some interesting information about Rafale. For Typhoon, other people do the job very well, as you, for example (sometimes), Scorpion, Toan, and others.

    Don’t expect me to play the ball unless you play it fair.

    TMor
    Participant

    Why bother, Scorpion?

    Some of the Rafale fanboys are capable of reasoned debate (hats off to Nic, recently), others are capable of such debate, occasionally.

    Some will acknowledge Typhoon strengths and Rafale weaknesses as we acknowledge Rafale strengths and Typhoon weaknesses.

    But there are a handful of witless trolls and/or Typhoon haters who really are best ignored. Their ‘contributions’ mark them out for what they are.

    If only you weren’t the kind of guy criticizing all comments favorable to Rafale… :rolleyes:

    TMor
    Participant

    Gentleman, you can now begin name calling.

    Why ? From who ? Against who ?

    TMor
    Participant

    “Les cons, ça ose tout, c’est même à ça qu’on les reconnait” – M. Audiart
    😉

    “Who dares win.” Special Air Service.:D

    TMor
    Participant

    It’s not because you’re English… :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,365 total)