dark light

…starfire

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 394 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lancaster RF141/Uncle Joe Again #1322269
    …starfire
    Participant

    Is RF141 a decal option from the kit?

    in reply to: Me 109 red 7 update #1266222
    …starfire
    Participant

    The rumors were right with Manching, but not with the new owner … The statement on the MAC-Homepage mentions EADS, instead of the “Messerschmitt-Stiftung”.

    http://shop.me-air-company.de/index.php?language=de (no text in english available)

    in reply to: Me 109 red 7 update #1285690
    …starfire
    Participant

    Rumors are, Red 7 has been sold to the “Messerschmitt Stiftung” (who also own Black 2 and FM+BB).
    One of the owners decided to leave the project and the remaining people did not have the money to pay him off and finish the restoration. After completion, the plane is said to be transferred to the Manching.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 1st flight images #1316450
    …starfire
    Participant

    Und sie fliegt doch! Great news! 🙂

    in reply to: When are the Corgi Halifaxes coming? #227418
    …starfire
    Participant

    An all red Halifax? Never heard of it. Are there any more infos regarding that plane? :confused:

    in reply to: German Seafury to Duxford by helicopter – Image request #1245857
    …starfire
    Participant

    I hope I´m not too curious, but please allow me to dig a little bit deeper:
    Restoration to fly, source for spare parts or just standing around?
    Thanks anyway.

    in reply to: German Seafury to Duxford by helicopter – Image request #1245883
    …starfire
    Participant

    One year later (in 2007) … not quote zombie-thread-age :diablo:

    Can anyone give us an update about Charley Yankee´s current status?

    in reply to: Fancy a Curtiss Sparrowhawk? #1265985
    …starfire
    Participant

    The quality of the pictures is amazing. OK the wreckage lies only in a depth of 1000ft. and not in the deep sea, but still … Especially the second pic, I cannot believe it was taken underwater.

    in reply to: RAF Junkers F13 J7232 #1271955
    …starfire
    Participant

    Talking about this very sketch (- quess the answer on your question will be “no” -), just take a look at the Revell-Kit´s wings … The trailing edge / ailerons doesn´t match at all, right?

    http://modellversium.de/kit/bilder/1316-f132.jpg

    The article you mentioned – what means “AE 16”?

    in reply to: RAF Junkers F13 J7232 #1272317
    …starfire
    Participant

    There’s a bit on the wings here:
    http://www.airwarfareforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=5277 in a plan showing the wings

    Bingo! That sketch will do, thanks for the link James. I do not know, if I can build new ailerons, but it´s good to know, just clipping the wings will be a good match …

    So the F13’s wing was a strong structure and who knows maybe the RAF replaced the one tested to destruction and it survived to be dumped for exposure tests at the end of its cost effective life.

    … or I pretend the old wings were replaced by a brand new set of wide-span-wings and build the kit out of the box. 😀

    BTW: There is actually a undated small photo printed in the mentioned “RAF Aircraft …” – it shows the position of the fuselage markings, but nothing more than the wings leading edges …

    in reply to: RAF Junkers F13 J7232 #1274161
    …starfire
    Participant

    Hi super sioux,

    my reference-article about the F13 quotes three spans – 14,4m, later 14,8m and 17,75m. Initially, only the Floatplanes got the “big wing”, but later all F13 were fittet with it. So maybe we´re talking about the 14,8m-wing.

    However, could there be another mistake in the book? If the wings were destroyed in 6.23 by the AEE, how can the plane force-land at Frensham a year later, not to mention Netheravon?

    J7232 – Early machine with short span wings, unbalanced rudder and ailerons, assembly at Handley Page, RAE (engine fitted) 7.22-1.23; AEE 6.23; Wing tested to destruction at Farnb. 6.23; RAE 10.23-5.25(…); FL (=Forced landed??), Frensham 7.24; SD Flight Netheravon 6/29 (airborne smoe devt); Fuselage dumped in open for exposure tests …

    in reply to: G-AGJG piccies wanted #545653
    …starfire
    Participant

    Thanks for the link Keith (and JDK for the pics), thats exactly what I was looking for.

    in reply to: Airfix in trouble… #1290832
    …starfire
    Participant

    Are they talking about Revell Germany or Revell USA taking over Airfix?

    in reply to: Jeff Hawke #1343822
    …starfire
    Participant

    Hi I have been searching for a number of years for a copy of B-25 Mitchell’s fly in IMC.

    For the benefit of the uneducated – WTF is “B-25 Mitchell’s fly in IMC”? :confused:

    in reply to: Any experts on Spitfire serials? #1350539
    …starfire
    Participant

    According to my old RAF Aircraft DA100-DZ999, the batch DG689 to DJ700 was allocated to Avro Ansons. However, there is a gap between DG987 and DJ103. :confused:

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 394 total)