dark light

Buran

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 376 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2229730
    Buran
    Participant

    Doesn’t mean they are servicable though, taking a hammer to the insides of a cockpit can sort that out.

    ISIS is not an orphan organisation, they have supporters at the right levels of Govts to make that happen. If bankrupt Taliban had an airforce why cant ISIS with a daily income of $3million from illegal oil business afford few planes?

    Im sure there are plenty of defecting pilots and engineers willing to help ISIS out.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2231331
    Buran
    Participant

    What if you can’t destroy it by air? Your enemy can retro-engineer your hardware as much as he wants.

    Just find a secure way to send the auto-destruction order. The M-1 costs 5-10 million, you might as well spend a few k$ for that capability.

    More secure than the B2 and F35 infomration that a certain country was able to hack into?

    Not sure if anyone would be willing to buy US weapons if in the first hour of the war fighter jets started dropping like rocks and US made Tanks blowing up on the ground. Just imagine how much it would cost to replace all the comms gear and codes after a single leak.

    The best US can do is to stop arming unstable regimes around the world.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2233452
    Buran
    Participant

    It doesn’t look very good does it though? IS running around with US hardware hacking off heads and slaughtering people. Unless decisive action is taken, people will tend to form the opinion that this is a conspiracy aimed at weakening the Shia allies of Iran on behalf of Israel and Saudi Arabia etc.

    In 2003, the US was prepared to act without UN approval to remove Saddam. In 2011, they were prepared to act without UN approval to conduct airstrikes to remove Gaddafi (no fly zone –> CAS zone). And for Syria in 2013 the same can be said were it not for Congress/the public holding them back. Now they won’t even act with almost unanimous approval to conduct decisive airstrikes on IS, who everyone can universally agree are completely insane.

    There has never been a decisive air strike against a guerrilla insurgency in recent history. Even Israel couldnt knock Hamas out by around the clock bombing of a strip of land the size of Manhattan. Even if US acts alone they are not going to commit ground troops, and you cannot win a ground war with only air power. The Sunnis and Kurds are not going to go much beyond their defensive positions in north and south of the country.

    The Western Sunni area in Iraq and across the border in Syria is in ISIS hands. Who is going to take over that area from ISIS? US ground forces? And after every ISIS member has been bombed to death by air?

    in reply to: Kurdish air force #2233648
    Buran
    Participant

    So the Western strategy is

    1- Arm Sunni’s in Syria
    2- When that gets out of hand, arm Kurds to contain Sunnis
    3- And when Kurds march towards Baghdad, arm Shias to contain the Kurds
    4- Keep supporting some Sunni rebels to check Shias/Iran

    excellent

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2233657
    Buran
    Participant

    Far better C4ISTAR, SA and target acquisition. More assets, better comms. No harm in trying unless there’s an ulterior motive for not doing so.

    C41STAR or not, I dont have any hope for a “well trained” army which fled en mass when rebels riding pick up trucks tuned up at their bases.

    All that means is that these areas will be under Iraqi control as long as US bombers are flying overhead. If the soldiers on the gorund are not willing to fight what can the Americans acheive? And why would a Shia soldier die for a Sunni town somewhere in the northern desert? As long as ISIS keeps away from Shia areas they are happy.

    Just have a look at how many Afghan provinces are under full Govt control.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2233962
    Buran
    Participant

    Conduct a proper air campaign aimed at defeating IS rather than just ‘limited airstrikes’ intended on protecting the minorities. What we’re seeing is a ‘limited’ air campaign neutered by politics and Obama bickering with Al-Maliki over his government being unrepresentative. What he should do is put out the house fire first and then continue arguing with his wife later.

    Continuous drone strikes, boots on the ground and thousands of dead American soldiers could not finish off Taliban. What makes you think an air campaign will have this impact on IS?

    Only a strong Iraqi army/ air force can do that, and I dont think they have the stomach for a fight. Shia and Kurds have been sitting idle as long as IS didnt threaten their heartlands in north and south. Iraqi army might be impressive on paper but ISIS fighters have been battle hardened in guerilla warfare in Syria, its not going to be easy without local support.

    in reply to: Kurdish air force #2234119
    Buran
    Participant

    I dont think US is legally allowed to arm the Kurds without Iraqi central govt authorisation. I would bet we will see the Ukranian rebel airforce the very next day if that was to happen.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2234847
    Buran
    Participant

    Not sure if US can run a sustained campaign solely from the carriers. They would need assets on ground in Qatar and UAE to participate if these Govts agreed. Basing fighters in Iraq would give a wrong message at home.

    All this in a country which can afford the latest weapons (already being helped by Russians). Who knows what will happen when troops are withdrawn from Afghanistan and Afghans have to face their battle hardened insurgents.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2234861
    Buran
    Participant

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28709530

    No details on what was used though.

    2 FA/18s dropped 500pound LGBs. Most likely from a carrier based in the Persian gulf.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2234941
    Buran
    Participant

    Given that US would be using force on Sunni fighters in support the Iraqi Shia government, and that these assets would most likely fly out of Sunni countries (Qatar, UAE etc) would base protection become an issue there?

    This might be the first time that US is using these assets in a Shia/Sunni fight. Apart from the local Govts, their population has sympathies for the Suni fighters.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2286196
    Buran
    Participant

    I was thinking more of the UAE’s loss of the capability. Is it really willing to give it up?

    No loss of capability as they have 300 SLAM-ERs on order along with 1200 JSOWs.

    Existing inventory can be sold to Saudi Arabia if needed.

    I’ve read that upto late 90s many Mirage-2000 in UAE were flown by Pakistani pilots/instructors anyways. They even wanted 200 Pakistani pilots for their Block 60s until US balked at the idea.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pakistani-pilot-deal-linked-to-us-block-on-uae-technology-49515/

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2286264
    Buran
    Participant

    Cargo planes used for surveillance missions by the Ukrainean side (the An-26 it seems) do fly high and one was shot down only days ago.

    I doubt you can do much ground surveillance from 30,000 feet especially using a standard cargo plane, without any specialist equipment.

    If this was done by the rebels than NATO/West needs to run some SEAD/DEAD missions over eastern Ukraine. BUK is a mobile systems and some rebels (if they really are not under Russian control) might be more than willing to shoot at other targets, if the price is right.

    ISIS after running over base after base in Syria has not been able to use one of the SAM systems.

    in reply to: ISIS versus everyone else #2212889
    Buran
    Participant

    Given that Iraqis would be pressing everything they have into action. How can they best use their 20 odd Super Mushak trainers (when delivered)? I think Sweden had their planes armed with gun pods and missiles, not sure of the current situation.

    in reply to: IAF C-130J Super Hercules Aircraft crashes #2227972
    Buran
    Participant

    What’s so blasphemous about suggesting that the crash could be due to pilot error? Some people just need to chill out and stop moaning like children.

    Everyone will appreciate if you took this India / Pak argument elsewhere.

    Thanks

    in reply to: Missing Malaysian Airlines B777 #499731
    Buran
    Participant

    Given the latest news that the plane turned west, following the way points for flights travelling to europe and middle east. Could it be that due to a massive avionics/electrical failure the autopilot automatically started flying towards one of the last few destinations that had been entered into the computer?

    In the days before the disappearence this plane flew to Dhaka and Mumbai.

    If this was a highjacking or an accident, why would you fly from one waypoint to the other in the wrong direction? The pings to satellite indicate the following

    “It supposedly headed towards a waypoint called “Vampi,” which is used by planes following route N571 to the Middle East, and then onto the “Gival” waypoint, south of the Thai island of Phuket, before heading northwest towards waypoint “Igrex,” which would take it over the Andaman Islands on route P628, used by airlines to fly towards Europe”

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 376 total)