If I get the time I might be tempted to ask the question this weekend, BAe Heritage has a display at NAM’s Lightning event!
The ‘correct’ word was used many times in the film I saw last night!
Just spotted this link on the BBC to the flypast that took place today http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22554314
Unashamed bump for this one today – tables are set out; NAM’s exhibits moved into places; first exhibitors due on site tomorrow; good local media coverage courtesy of the BBC – hope to see some forumites at the weekend!
Good to chat last night Mr Hatton and it was a privilege to be part of such an evocative event and to see and ‘hear’ the original version of the film in such notable company.
Once again thanks for the shared thoughts and feedback.
The reason I’m trying to get some information relates to one of the roles that I assist with at NAM and this involves responding to ‘comments & complaints’.
It’s always good to try and be ahead of the game on such matters and as they’ve already had ‘incoming comments’ about the markings since they were reapplied; I felt it prudent to make a few enquiries.
It can also provide some fascinating insights into the service career of individual airframes. Recent feedback has come in regarding the Operation Heliotrope markings on the Hastings. I’ve been led to believe that for the first Heliotrope markings, the mouth of the fish was closed – however following the success of the film Jaws, these DayGlo fish were reapplied with their mouths open as ‘homage’ to the film!
With that thought in mind I pondered whether some ‘wag’ on 54 Squadron had similar ideas re-the Squadron markings on XX829?
I’m not sure whether it was a decal or not; and certainly on the photograph of the repainted markings the ‘checks’ also seem to have been reversed as well.
The next time I visit NAM I’ll have a look on the other side as well – I’ve gone through all of my photographs from since the time it arrived and I’ve only ever photographed it from the ‘sunny-side!’
Thank you for your initial suggestions – the non-flipped stencil does seem plausible.
What would be nice is to try and work out is how long the error has been on the airframe!
A short update has been added to the NAM website to highlight the progress that is being made on the Hastings repaint – plus the recent reapplication of the Operation Heliotrope mission marks!!
:apologetic: Sorry Anon, sloppy document control by the ‘webbie’ – who can’t even blame the organiser!
Now corrected and it shouldn’t happen again!!
Partially covered in this thread http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?124187-New-Imperial-Airways-museum 🙂
Never a quiet time at Newark as the latest Cockpit-Fest update – has just gone live in here!
I’m slightly surprised that no one from about these parts has submitted an entry to the Free to enter Competition – still a good chance to win; as my information is that no one has yet entered! :confused:
The final album of the Lightning Archive images has been reloaded on to the NAM website here!
Thank you for the compliment but I’m not posting comments to secure such feedback, I’m posting to try and add some balance to what so often seems to be ‘a glass half empty mood’ that seems to prevail here!
Just to reemphasise part of an earlier post – “Young people (male and female) are a lot more interested in aviation than some people seem prepared to give them credit for.” That’s not just around Newark but in areas around aviation sites all over the country!
One other thought to ponder – with the age of mass travel for holidays and the like, I believe that a lot of the aura that once surrounded aviation has dissipated somewhat, now in some cases going on an aircraft is almost like catching a bus. Back in the 1970s the one thing that grabbed my attention with Newark Air Museum was being able to get close up and go into an aircraft and then ‘shock – horror’ being allowed to work on them!!
Thank you for the compliment but I’m not posting comments to secure such feedback, I’m posting to try and add some balance to what so often seems to be ‘a glass half empty mood’ that seems to prevail here!
Just to reemphasise part of an earlier post – “Young people (male and female) are a lot more interested in aviation than some people seem prepared to give them credit for.” That’s not just around Newark but in areas around aviation sites all over the country!
One other thought to ponder – with the age of mass travel for holidays and the like, I believe that a lot of the aura that once surrounded aviation has dissipated somewhat, now in some cases going on an aircraft is almost like catching a bus. Back in the 1970s the one thing that grabbed my attention with Newark Air Museum was being able to get close up and go into an aircraft and then ‘shock – horror’ being allowed to work on them!!
For additional clarity re Scouts – many Packs are allowed to select, which Badges they would like to try to work towards and many youngsters are encouraged to check out the requirements of the Badges for themselves by using the Scoutbase website. At least they did in the two different Packs my sons went to – one did the Badges at Newark and the other went to Duxford! :rolleyes: