dark light

TwinOtter23

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,651 through 4,665 (of 7,125 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PIG SICK read this…….. #1876124
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I know nothing further – unless it’s a similar policy to that explained by vildebeest.

    That said the policy mentioned by vildebeest also raises a question.

    Most Scout groups are likely to have charitable status and unless your articles of incorporation allow it to happen – according to Charity Commission rules one charity shouldn’t be raising funds or donating to another one! :confused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #289670
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I know nothing further – unless it’s a similar policy to that explained by vildebeest.

    That said the policy mentioned by vildebeest also raises a question.

    Most Scout groups are likely to have charitable status and unless your articles of incorporation allow it to happen – according to Charity Commission rules one charity shouldn’t be raising funds or donating to another one! :confused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #289672
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    At the moment I’m into fund raising (and all that it involves) and here’s some background on the Tesco policy on store-based collections!

    in reply to: PIG SICK read this…….. #1876126
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    At the moment I’m into fund raising (and all that it involves) and here’s some background on the Tesco policy on store-based collections!

    in reply to: Ads appearing in threads #1876228
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Another thank you Peter – you learn something new everyday!

    in reply to: General Discussion #289697
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Another thank you Peter – you learn something new everyday!

    in reply to: General Discussion #289740
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    You can always ‘try’ and opt out of the ‘Adsense campaign’ via the AdChoices button – but G****e then may throw its toys out of the pram and mess up your settings; you may also need to clear your cookies!!

    in reply to: What made you (want to) Swear Today III? #1876437
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    You can always ‘try’ and opt out of the ‘Adsense campaign’ via the AdChoices button – but G****e then may throw its toys out of the pram and mess up your settings; you may also need to clear your cookies!!

    in reply to: What Book Are You Reading? #1876764
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    “9J – The Story Of A Squadron” – about No.227(B) Squadron. 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #289812
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    “9J – The Story Of A Squadron” – about No.227(B) Squadron. 🙂

    in reply to: BAe contributed more to the JSF than I knew… #2320458
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    brilliant thanks. So are we concluding that this is a development model for the failed JAST bid (rather than an F22)?

    Conspiracy theorist in me, thinks that they (the man) are trying to cover up advanced Stealth projects by calling them F22s.:) …….

    TBH any conclusion may be best left open – I understand that the museum has already received some significant feedback on the topic this morning and perhaps the alternative nose configuration might have been best fitted to the BAe P1216 model. Many thanks if you’re from around these parts! 😉

    As for any ‘conspiracy theories’ they might lay at the museum’s door and the interpretation ‘they’ applied to the objects when they were added to the collection; and to the person who drafted the original news release text! 😮

    in reply to: BAe contributed more to the JSF than I knew… #2320581
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Further to the previous post I re-read the May 2011 newsletter text, which actually provided some additional information about the history of the models.

    This morning I have arranged for it to be incorporated into an Object of the Week item in this section of the museum website – where it should remain live for the next 4 weeks.

    As it says in the text any feedback would be appreciated!! 🙂

    in reply to: BAe contributed more to the JSF than I knew… #2320729
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I’m not sure why the P1216 wasn’t mentioned in the original text but they are the same models – the P1216 model was recently featured in the May 2011 member’s newsletter; having been repainted into a ‘fictional’ IV Squadron RAF camouflage colour scheme. If you PM me an email address I will send through a PDF of the newsletter. 🙂

    in reply to: BAe contributed more to the JSF than I knew… #2320734
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Just for a bit of clarity the following item appeared in the Newark Air Museum member’s newsletter back in March 2004:

    “Radar Profiling Models Donated

    Newark Air Museum has recently taken delivery of a collection of radar profiling models. The operational use of these models was the assessment and testing of different radar systems by the government’s Radar Research Department in Malvern, Worcs.

    The aircraft are scale representations of various British, American and Russian types and they each have adjustable mounting points to allow them to be suspended in various flying attitudes. Some were fitted with scaled down jet engines to represent the heat signature of the aircraft.

    Types in the collection include a Canberra, Jaguar, Phantom, Skyhawk and HS 125. Also amongst the collection is a Lockheed Martin F.22 ‘Raptor’, which is depicted on the attached JPG image, contrasting with the Auster Autocrat G-AGOH in the museum hangar.

    Also included in the delivery were a target drone and a selection of missile models including two Martels, an Exocet, a Sea Eagle and a Chinese ‘Confucius’.

    It is planned that some of these models will be displayed in ‘flying’ mode in the new Hangar which is currently well on the way to completion.”

    As a result I’m not sure whether the model was of a British design – some of the Russian variant models were ‘painted up’ and they are displayed in the Cold War display at Cosford.

    Also they were never displayed in the flying mode!

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1035789
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Bank Holiday Opening

    Just a quick heads up for anyone possibly visiting the museum this weekend, please don’t be put off accessing the museum by some over officious stewards manning the gate for an event on the Showground as explained by this text from the museum Website:

    “Despite what you may be advised the museum is not closed this weekend and any visitors are entitled to unrestricted access down to the museum site.

    This weekend there is a major camping style event running on the Showground called the International Festival of Lanterns (IFOL). Some of the stewards for this event have been advising visitors that the museum is closed – this is not the case and museum visitors are allowed to access the museum.

    If you encounter any problems please advise the museum staff in the Shop and they will have further words with the IFOL staff.

    Throughout Saturday most people got through to the museum OK, where the volunteers had managed to get several aircraft open including the Vulcan, Varsity, Hastings, Canberra T19 and viewing access for the Viggen!”

Viewing 15 posts - 4,651 through 4,665 (of 7,125 total)