dark light

TwinOtter23

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,236 through 5,250 (of 7,125 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1103067
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The museum website is reporting a resumption of ‘normal service’ on the WC front – thanks to the efforts of staff and volunteers!! 🙂

    in reply to: A Time for Reflection #1103070
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Been meaning to thank Twin Otter and Newark for sharing some information with the Alberta Aviation Museum in Edmonton, Alberta.

    After reviewing the info we have very much in common from size of collection to the challenges we face.

    …..

    I think private museums must remember our first duty is to survive and that means taking care of business…the customer.

    …..
    Tom H

    No problem Tom, I’m pleased to have been some assistance with the information that was supplied. 🙂

    The ‘customer’ point is sadly often overlooked as is the reality that the majority of a museum’s ‘customers’ are unlikely to be ‘aviation enthusiasts’; so in order to ‘survive and thrive’ you need to address all types of ‘customer’, when interpreting a collection.

    This latter point is something that NAM is starting to benefit from, by listening to display ideas from ‘non-aviation enthusiasts’; this will become more apparent at NAM over the coming weeks and months and is in part reflected by ideas like the ‘Object of the Week’ item on the website.

    Tony, I sincerely hope that the Boscombe Collection is able to continue and in so doing represent this important aspect of British aviation heritage. 🙂

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1103507
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    If anyone is interested in the Corgi Military Aviation Archive range of die cast collectables I understand there’s a list available of what the NAM Shop currently has in stock – it might help you beat the forthcoming VAT increase.

    PM me an email address if you’d like a copy and I’ll try and get a copy emailed through to you. 🙂

    in reply to: RAF Halton Christmas Day #1103753
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Vulcans landing on grass were partially covered here in 2009, including the RAF Newton example! 🙂

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1103774
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    🙁 Weather related problems continue at NAM – details from the update that’s just been added to the museum website:

    “The museum currently has no water supply to the ladies and gents toilets, which has been caused by a frozen pipe that has burst in the roof of the ladies toilet. This means that the main site toilets are out of order and we only have a limited toilet facility available in the café for urgent situations.

    Obviously with it being a Bank Holiday we are finding it difficult to locate a plumber who can come out and help resolve the situation.

    At the moment the museum remains open and we will monitor the situation and advise tomorrow whether we have been able to resolve the problem – sorry for any problems this may cause.”

    in reply to: Newark's Luscombe Query ? #1104023
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Keith would Thursday be OK?

    I know in the exhibit file there are further schematics of the configuration / designs; although I don’t believe there are any details of any ‘recorded Ops!’

    I also seem to recall some recent contact with the Luscombe family who understood that the airframe had been lost!

    in reply to: Newark's Luscombe Query ? #1104039
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Luscombe P3 Rattler Strike G-BKPG

    Keith,

    The following text on the Rattler Strike is a lift from the current NAM Guide Book; please let me know if this is sufficient information for your requirements.

    If not leave it with me until Thursday when I will be able to check in the Museum Archive, where I know there has been some new material put on file! 🙂

    “Luscombe P3 Rattler Strike G-BKPG

    NAHR status – Noteworthy

    Aircrew: One
    Span: 10.97 m (36´0˝)
    Length: 4.57 m (15´0”)
    Height: 1.83 m (6’0”)
    Proposed Armament: McDonnell Douglas 7.62 mm chain gun, optional rocket launchers and anti-personnel mine or chaff dispensers
    Typical Speed: 145 km/h (90 mph)
    Range: 1,595 km (990 miles)
    Service Ceiling: not known
    Loaded Weight: 839 kg (1,850 lbs)
    Power Plant: One 63 kW (85 hp) Limbach 2000 engine

    Luscombe Aircraft was formed at Lympne, Kent to design and build lightweight sporting aircraft for private operators. The first project design was initiated in 1971 for the Luscombe Vitality. Subsequently, the company developed a lightweight military version of this aircraft, known as the Rattler and also an ultra-light two-seat civil variant named the Valiant. Later the company also initiated the development of a smaller version of the Rattler known as the Viper.

    Subsequently the company started work on a two-seat tandem-wing general-purpose aircraft known as the Ranger, a four-seat variant with a longer fuselage, known as the Super Ranger and a twin-engined development known as the Twin Ranger. Rights in the Ranger series of aircraft eventually transferred to United Aerospace Technologies Ltd, based in Plymouth, Devon. (Mr T Luscombe becoming a joint Director of the Company).

    G-BKPG was the pre-production airframe and it flew for the first time on 2nd November 1983. The aircraft was designed to provide quick reaction close military support and also to be easily dismantled for quick deployment around the battlefield. Advice on the best mix of weapons was obtained from the Royal Ordnance Factory but it is not known whether any of the proposed weapon systems were ever tested on the aircraft.

    The Luscombe P3 Rattler Strike G-BKPG joined the collection in December 2000. Having been based at Egginton, Derbyshire the Luscombe P3 Rattler Strike was placed on extended loan at the Museum thanks to the good offices of Bill Fearn.”

    in reply to: For De Havilland Sea Hornet Fans – Urgent! #1104246
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Psychic? :diablo:

    in reply to: For De Havilland Sea Hornet Fans – Urgent! #1104267
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    😀 Or alternatively there is this one available!

    in reply to: A Time for Reflection #1104276
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Some good points there Kev, that would form an excellent template for what questions to address when looking to develop a sound Development Plan! 🙂

    in reply to: A Time for Reflection #1104361
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Further thoughts

    Thank you for your comment Bruce – it’s ‘interesting’ how many situations actually come round time after time!

    As so often in life the ‘unexpected’ can have serious potential impacts on any operation. You can show good governance and planning, but unexpected situations arise, which can affect even the best run organisation.

    Even when you think you’re in control of your own destiny, external events and decisions can have potentially detrimental impacts on your operation. Examples of this could be at a national level – changes to the Minimum Wage, VAT and Gift Aid; or at a local level possible developments on land or locations close to you could have a potentially negative impact.

    These were some of the reasons behind the phrase in my first post of being “both flexible and agile in their thinking” – you need to be able to react quickly and effectively to what any external sources might throw at you!

    On further reflection, now days you also need to be aware of the ‘funding challenge’ that you may face and wherever possible try to live within your anticipated means. Whilst there are still funding opportunities around – you have to work hard to secure them and they may only be available in much smaller ‘bites’ than even three or four years ago.

    in reply to: A Time for Reflection #1104854
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    IMHO in today’s challenging economic time’s museums have to work with their existing collections, be they either airframes or objects, rather than stretching themselves with major new acquisitions.

    It is my personal view that NAM’s decision not to proceed with the acquisition of the Nimrod R1 will prove to be an important moment in its ongoing development, and one that could help secure an enhanced long-term future of many other items in the collection.

    Independent museums like Newark Air Museum need to be both flexible and agile in their thinking when considering capital projects like NAM’s proposed new Visitor Centre on the Southfield Site; airframe acquisitions / loans; and widening access to a wealth of material that already exists in collections across the UK.

    Undoubtedly challenging times lie ahead!

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1105381
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    25.12.44

    Christmas Dinner
    Monday 25th December 1944
    Airman’s Mess R.A.F Station Winthorpe
    in reply to: TSR2: Hell-For-Leather #1106051
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    An excellent piece of work – and I must get more of the book read this holiday! 🙂

    in reply to: Puzzled of Peterborough #1106801
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I don’t disagree with you Graham hence my opening comment of, “I can hear the cries of heretic now …”

    That said, I believe that digital media could be the way forward; most phones, cameras, gadgets etc already come with digital or online manuals and people are becoming more comfortable with the medium. Whilst I don’t see it replacing every printed item it could be the way forward for subjects with a limited interest.

Viewing 15 posts - 5,236 through 5,250 (of 7,125 total)