dark light

TwinOtter23

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,731 through 5,745 (of 7,125 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1100569
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Safely inside!

    The museum website is now reporting that the Jaguar cockpit now has a new under cover home at NAM …

    “Update 27.04.10

    Earlier today sufficient space was cleared inside Hangar 1 to allow the Jaguar cockpit to be moved under cover. Its new display position is conveniently located just inside the hangar doors, which will allow for it to be moved outside for special events or potentially to be transported off site to be displayed at other events.” 🙂

    in reply to: Beverley and Hunter, Ft. Paull 25/04/10 #1101005
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The 2001 NAHR edition lists XB259 as – Significant; plus it was still resident at The Museum of Army Transport!

    in reply to: TSR-2 Olympus engine anyone? #1101711
    TwinOtter23
    Participant
    in reply to: Help needed for ww2 pathfinder. #1101880
    TwinOtter23
    Participant
    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1101905
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Paul, you have a PM – unable to post picture, out of space on here! 😮

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1102230
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Jaguar cockpit picture added to the NAM website plus the story has appeared on the Key Aero site!

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1103757
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Great V-Force gathering today – but there’s still chance to particpate / meet people tomorrow.

    They even managed to get things sorted to get the Jaguar cockpit open as well! Along with many other museum aircraft!! 😀

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1104918
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Thanks for the offer we may be in touch. 🙂

    Further information shows the sight was removed to fit a screen of some sort for its last role as a recruiting aid – the question to be debated now is whether to put a screen back to represent this era and its ‘recruitment role’, or to take it back to a pure airframe configuration! :confused:

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1105109
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    As yet I haven’t seen the cockpit unit but I understand that it’s parked alongside the Small Objects Exhibition Hall. From what I’m hearing I don’t necessarily think that it will be open for people to look in this weekend.

    The only additional information I have is that the cockpit is complete except for the gun sight! 🙂

    in reply to: National Aviation Heritage Register #1105140
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I would – but I’m not sure whether you’d get into the next publication, which sounds imminent!

    in reply to: National Aviation Heritage Register #1105207
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Interesting question!

    One of the opening comments reads – “The National Aviation Heritage Register includes all airframes held by organisations that are open to the public on a regular basis – defined as at least weekends throughout the summer months without the need for prior arrangement. etc etc”

    So would WR963 qualify? :confused:

    in reply to: National Aviation Heritage Register #1105224
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    There are 3 categories:

    National Benchmark (top listing possible)
    Significant
    Noteworthy

    NAM has aircraft in each category see here!

    Hopefully when the new NAHR is published they will have further additions to the National Benchmark category; this will be due to the aircraft that went under cover in Hangar 2 having their status elevated. 🙂

    WR963 wasn’t on the 2001 edition – but 7 others were listed!

    in reply to: National Aviation Heritage Register #1105246
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I saw the interview in front of the rather smart red JP as well!

    As for the NAHR, we’ll have to try and get the Jaguar cockpit added as well! 😀

    in reply to: National Aviation Heritage Register #1105252
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I agree – a credit to all involved in their training! 🙂

    in reply to: National Aviation Heritage Register #1105260
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    It sounds as though some of your students went ‘off message’ – congratulations to the instructors for teaching such excellent skill sets!! 😀

    IMHO a bit of a strange place to visit, when you’re advocating getting rid of RDAs! :confused:

Viewing 15 posts - 5,731 through 5,745 (of 7,125 total)