13-21 February 2010 Open Cockpits update
The NAM website News Page has been updated with details of some of the open cockpits for this week’s event. Ranging from the Phantom cockpit to the Vulcan. 🙂
I saw a comment on FC’s site regarding Jaguar XX145 – allegedly on Cranwell’s dump now?
If this is true, can’t it be saved? Seems like a terrible waste of an interesting aircraft when something less valuable could be used? Can’t NAM rescue it?
If and when it ever comes up for disposal perhaps you could offer to buy it for NAM – nice philanthropic gesture and all that!! 😉
Now if the cheque had enough noughts on it and there was a real need then perhaps this one might respond to any call to arms!! 😀
NAM
:diablo: 😀
– Limited flying display – dependent on aircraft transiting through the low flying zone** or being in a wide circuit at RAF Waddington
– Extensive ‘static park’ with just under 70 aircraft and cockpits on display daily
– Don’t let the weather put you off as 44 aircraft are displayed under cover
– Open all year round
– Aircraft access sometimes possible
– Nice friendly welcome always guaranteed
Admission: Adults £6.25, Over 60s £5.75, Children £4.00 and Family ticket [2 adults & 3 children] £18.50. Appointments are preferred for Group [15 plus people] visits, although not essential and a party rate booking information pack is available on application. Gift Aid rate is available, which greatly assists the funding of the museum’s activities!
** Low fly area currently believed to be under evaluation / monitoring due to possible complaints by a local resident (equipment installed on ex-airfield). 😡
I believe that these are the two pieces of legislation that most organisations are working to: Ionising Radiation Regulations 1999 (IRR99) and the Radioactive Substances Act 1993 (RSA93).
Plus take up the suggestion made here http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=1532956&postcount=43
I believe that any previous exemptions i.e. watch repair, may also now have been rescinded. Plus it isn’t just instruments …..this issue will not go away!
Covered here http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=1534834&postcount=72
IIRC you’ll find that both pieces of legislation apply – certainly to groups, traders etc you need to have a license – not 100% certain about an individual.
Re IRR99 try this link http://www.radman.co.uk/resources/IRR99-ionising-radiation-regulations.aspx
Good sensible advise thankyou I will take it. 🙂
Your post about RSA93 nudged the grey matter to recall IRR99 and the Radman Associates advice. 🙂
Peter, the bottom line is that no active items (this is not just instrumentation) are ever totally safe.
Paul, I believe that surveys on the MiG-27 and MiG-27 at NAM showed them to be OK (the cockpits are both fairly complete but not sure about their clocks, which are normally the first items to be taken) and both cockpits are now occasionally opened to allow inspection. Not sure about any other ex-Russian airframes.
….Apparently you have to specify ‘swept’ or ‘spread’ on ordering, as that’s fixed then. They make a wide load, and the RAAF Museum’s F-111G ‘Boneyard Wrangler’ was prepared, sent and re-erected by 6 Sqn Squadron staff at the Museum. They did a good job, and I’m sure they’d like a holiday in the UK, but I suspect the ADF wouldn’t be keen to pay tickets.
I must hasten to add this is all idle personal speculation but I presume that the wing pins have a similar locating principle to those on the MiG-23 and MiG-27? :confused:
Good ‘in-house’ experience exists on those airframes! 😀 :diablo:
Nevertheless if it made it to the Lincolnshire area it could remain and make a nice memorial to the many Australians that served in the local area going back to World War I with the AFC at South Carlton and on through World War II.
I know somewhere with its own strong Australian connections that could provide a suitable home – how easily do they take to pieces? 😀
:diablo: NAM could do a ‘what if comparison’ with its collection of TSR-2 bits – if nothing else that would create a big talking point! 😀 😀
I wasn’t for one minute running down the Strathallan Collection – indeed I actually visited the site to ‘recce’ the T4 with a view to possible bid by NAM, but that wasn’t to be – I was merely commenting on the wording “who was willing to transport a Shack in those days or even today.”
Several groups have been willing and able! 😀
… Waiting to be shot down but as somebody said earlier who was willing to transport a Shack in those days or even today.
Newark was in spring 1977 – a Mk.3 Phase 3 🙂
Others followed including Gatwick!
Where there’s a will there’s a way!!
Jon, IIRC the Strathallan visit was in 1979/80 and we also called in at Scone to check on something there – my records from that time are all now in NAM Archive!
Mike, yes finance is also important and always will be but; you still need a determination and often innovative thinking to make it all happen. It’s also surprising what can be achieved when others say that ‘it cannot be done!’
Moving WR977 took approximately 6 weeks; given more time I don’t doubt that they would have had a go at the Finningley Beverley as well! 😮
Footnote: nice to hear that Twin Otters are coming back into production; many happy hours spent watching them land at Montreal in 1975!