dark light

Jolanta Nowak

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 157 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news #2521048
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    Just read in the press that RAF Typhoons are already scheduled for Middle East ops.

    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    I think Aer Lingus will do very well on these routes. The London times are certain to pick up a shed load of business travellers from City. The very fact that they are using BA as a partner for onward connectins coupled with the sensible late arrival time into International will surely tempt. The ones that should be worried is Easyjet. The Amsterdam has been left to bumble along and Aer Lingus having KLM as a partner ,coupled again wioth the early departure ,will turnit from a smokers special into a sensible business option.This will also eat into Bmi,s customer base. Interesting times:)

    Spot on – BMI had better look to their laurels, on which they have been resting complacently for far too long.

    in reply to: What will be a classic in the future? #2522363
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    To return the thread to its original topic, I’m not sure whether ‘a classic’ has ever been defined but my own suspicion is that the F-117 will scrape in, if only out of quirkiness.

    in reply to: Canards and the 4++ Gen. aircraft #2532804
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    Talk about a sterile discussion.

    This one should have been axed by the mods several ice ages ago…

    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    You know, the Phantom always was one powerful and mean looking warbird.

    IMHO it still is. Modern types strike me, looks wise, as just too saccharin sweet.

    in reply to: Aviation firsts and innovations #2540439
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    Do you mean 1936, or 1939…

    Edit: Nevermind, you meant 1936. September 1939 was when the Anson concucted the first RAF attack on a German U-Boat. Significant, but FAR outweighed by what the Anson did in September 1936. I won’t give it away, except to say it was…”Courageous” 😀

    Indeed it was.

    I’m surprised nobody else seems to have thought about this hugely significant matter.

    I’m off on holiday for a while now, so I’m very happy for you to enlighten the poor strugglers if they persist with their struggles…

    in reply to: Aviation firsts and innovations #2540841
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    Was the Avro Anson the first monoplane and first aircraft with retractable undercarriage to enter RAF service? I read this on the net elsewhere and was sure it was the Anson that was being talked about.

    Could be but this is WAY behind the importance of what I’m talking about. One of THE key developments in world, military aviation.

    Looks like I’ll have to give you guys two clues instead of one:

    1. Avro Anson

    2. September 1936 (I think!)

    in reply to: Aviation firsts and innovations #2540991
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    Ok you guys. There is a totally unforgivable, glaring omission from this thread.
    Here is your clue:

    Avro Anson

    ….. ??

    in reply to: Better looking aircraft = better performance? #2540993
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    It really does depend on subjective judgement of ‘better looking’, doesn’t it? Sorry to state the obvious.

    Nevertheless, it’s interesting that, by common consent, fighters have become ‘better looking’ since the front-first, nose intake designs of the 50s – Sabres, MiGs15-21, Lightning etc – dropped out of the picture!

    in reply to: The Hawker P.1121. #2548138
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    If you think about it, the most successful 1960s fighters weren’t the OR 329 studies, the XF-108, or the CF-105, but the Mirage III, MiG-21, and F-4. Each of these designs were the product of evolution, not revolution, and none of them had the pure speed, height or hugely complex weapons systems of those cancelled fighters. They were first and foremost practical, utilitarian designs.

    Not sure what we are to accept as ‘successful’. Numbers produced, is that it?
    Does that necessarily mean that these particular machines were actually any better than the ‘what ifs’ and the ‘if onlys’ could have been, had they seen the light of day?

    The problem is: we’ll never know.

    For sure, to take issue with you, some ‘revolutionary’ birds did see service – F104, Lightning, F-111 etc – and performed reasonably well.

    in reply to: Whatever happened to civil STOL? #548225
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    Someone asked above about aircraft types.

    Having (inevitably) to go back a few years, here in the UK we were pushing things like the Skyvan and the Islander. I can recall quite clearly that huge futures were being talked up for these, extended versions of them and new STOL projects… and this is precisely why I started the thread… somewhere it has all gone wrong for the concept.

    The noise problem with city airports was always going to be something of a problem – but I’ve heard it said that people who live in larger cities are actually used to a certain level of noise. For sure, some Londoners who bought a house near me a couple of years ago had to move back – because they found the silence at night ‘unnerving’!!!

    Sometimes I wonder whether it’s things like vested interest and historical inertia which kill off bright ideas like STOL. It wouldn’t surprise me at all that any new, revolutionary concept – no matter how good – can’t make headway against what is already in place because too many people have monied interest in seeing that it doesn’t.

    in reply to: The Hawker P.1121. #2548166
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    Well I assume that you are pointing towards some ideological reason, but this paticular bird just never seems to get the attention of its more famous would have been stablemates. In that sense it is kind of like the Supermarine Type-545, (if anyone has any information or pictures on that I would be very grateful).

    Oh indeed I’m ‘pointing towards some ideological reason’ – the petty detail that Blue Streak and your bird were both killed off by a Tory Government, a small but significant fact which sits rather uneasily with many ‘aviation enthusiasts’ more than somewhat skewed viewing of history.

    I apologise to you for the digression. Just couldn’t help it! I’m not too well up on the subject – any good links you can give me? This is an era which I remember quite a bit and, being a woman, I object to your having posted it in the historic aviation forum!!!

    in reply to: The Hawker P.1121. #2548186
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    You know, this thread has been up and running for at least 5 mins and, by now, had it been about the TSR2 or P1154, it would have been filled to overflowing with frothing, right wing rants about villainous Labour governments and explicit accusations of Directives Straight From The Kremlin.

    Bring on the P1121 or Blue Streak – suddenly the room goes awkwardly quiet.
    Now can anyone suggest the teensiest of reasons for this, one wonders…?

    in reply to: Whatever happened to civil STOL? #549693
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    Do London City (Docklands?) operations count?

    It’s one of the few “close-in” airports doing what it was designed for…even if dedicated STOL airliners aren’t being used.

    Yes, City Airport is exactly the kind of operation being foreseen back in the 70’s. The ability to fly right into the heart of a major city is still the one thing which STOL has on its side. People rightly baulk at the idea of your bog standard 1.5hr European flight time, for example, being more than doubled effectively by the airport – city centre transits at each end.

    I would have thought that, if only for this reason, we may yet see some future for STOL.

    in reply to: Beriev A-50 awacs capabilities #2553823
    Jolanta Nowak
    Participant

    I belive I asked aprox the same question about a year ago, and we got a nice little discussion going:

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=57086&highlight=A-50

    Enjoy! 🙂

    Thanks for that, Gauntlet. I think many of the ‘fighter obsessed’ lose sight of the fact that modern warfare isn’t a matter of ‘one-man-and-his-plane’.

    The best fighters in the world aren’t of much use if they’re in the wrong place at the wrong time. That is a lesson which goes back at least as far as the Battle of Britain.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 157 total)