It’ll be sad day when the J-8II retires. One of the last plane with the slim lines of a supermodel, in an age of BBW fighters.
Eurocans — including upcoming Gripen E/F — J-10, JF-17, even Tejas Mk. 2 should be pretty slick…
Like North Korea of late, this seems to be one of those issues that attracts more attention from foreigners than from the parties directly involved.
For example, the story rates only a single line entry on an incredibly crowded Times of India front page, and a mere opinion piece at that.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]216110[/ATTACH]
Contender has arrived!
Ultimately MiG-35 will be whatever RuAF wants it to be.
The whole cheap JF17 thing hasn’t caught on with anyone,
I think it is far too early to say that.
National Air Cargo 747 Crash at Bagram Afghanistan
A 747 contracted to the US Air Mobility Command crashed on takeoff at Bagram, eight persons were on board.
Remarkable footage… there doesn’t seem to be appropriate emoticon!
May the deceased rest in peace.
yeah just like how the Chinese are waiting for the WS-10 engine for their J-10s.. oh wait..
The circumstances are hardly comparable.
But no I don’t think PLAAF will be inducting JF-17, they don’t need it anymore than USAF needed F-20.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]215975[/ATTACH]
Best pic in thread. 😎
Bottom line is, no one seems to bother with tvc on previously non-tvc designs.
:rolleyes:
I’m a migrant myself but don’t expect the government to pump tons of cash into equal opportunity at the expense of services like health, education and defence
Political correctness marks the death knell of Western civilisation.
There is an irony in this statement: the renaming of departments of war to departments of defence is one of the most significant and pernicious developments in politically correct language ever to have occurred. The language came out of naïve internationalism amidst the ashes of Europe that declared the conduct of wars of aggression an evil that could no longer be tolerated. And if at first the language was merely naïve, it has since proven very useful for those seeking to obscure designs that they can no longer share openly — who can object to spending for the ‘defence’ of the nation? If we are honest with ourselves, the former name far more accurately reflects both the purpose of military forces and the actuality of their use as the extension of politics by other means.
I’m not sure why there seems to be perception that MiG-29 —> MiG-35 is somehow different from Su-27 —> Su-35 which nobody seems to have a problem with. Sure there were issues with original Fulcrum platform that limit its utility in post-Cold War environment, but those were addressed with MiG-29M. And sure it is running a couple years behind Su-35 but then it is more advanced in some ways (e.g. AESA) and unlike Su-35 there is no impending replacement!
Another possible objection is that Russia should restrict attention to heavy fighters because of their range, but whilst acknowledging the versatility of Flanker platform and suitability for Russian environment, it comes at high operating cost and there are tasks for which Flanker-size airframe is not required, i.e. same places MiG-29 Fulcrum is deployed now. And even if MiG-35 is not ideal from RuAF perspective it fulfils the core requirements of being a new airframe coupled with modern systems.
Ultimately the question of supporting MiG comes down to whether or not Russia in the long-term has both the requirements and resources to keep Sukhoi, MiG, Tupolev, etc. busy. If not, consolidation should occur. If yes, then preserving industrial capacity by inducting MiG-35 is a no-brainer.
Regarding India, I am increasingly of the opinion that AMCA should be placed on hold and indigenous efforts redirected to further development of Tejas platform coupled with ‘ground up’ investment in unmanned systems. In addressing both indigenous engine development and future medium combat aircraft needs, I believe Russia and its rumoured LMFS program provides the best solution.
LMFS (twin engine config) would enter service around 2030 to replace both IAF MiG-29 and Mirage 2000 and to provide the Indian Navy with a 5G+ carrier aircraft. In industrial terms, the engine technology would be the primary or even sole focus of India’s participation in the program and the goal would be to secure complete sovereignty in this respect, with shared future development options. The engine thereby obtained would be used not only in LMFS, but also in Tejas and X47-type UCAVs.
Scotland = 0
:dev2:
I didn’t get what the context of your post was or exactly what you were implying here..
He is saying that America will not provide assistance with state-of-the-art technologies leading to creation of a competitor for its own F-35 platform. And I agree, hence my own previous post.