At a minimum it suggests the UAE continues to see the F-16 block 60 as comparable to the Rafale and Eurofighter given that it is ordering more F-16s even after examining the latest versions of both the Rafale and Eurofighter.
By the same rationale USN evidently considers Super Hornet comparable to F-35. :rolleyes:
If there were no F-35C we might actually see what could be done with the SH platform. :apologetic:
But no thrust-vectoring! SH is a workhorse, no sense trying to turn it into a Ferrari.
All of the above.
“Just because its new, doesn’t mean its good.”
I have seen this “new visual aesthetic” before… and it is ALWAYS HARDER to read, and harder to find the various functions.
Well it would be easier if they also adopted the stripped-down functionality that generally goes with the aesthetic. :p
I think web forums such as this one are a dying breed like newsgroups before them. They’re too ‘Web 1.0’ and out of step with the kinds of online experiences that folks expect and seek out these days. If nothing else this update suggests they’re at least aware of the problem.
I don’t mean to bitch, but this change seems like a serious downgrade.
It brings things up to date aesthetically, but in functional terms it’s still the same bloated mess that it always was.
Note that I’m referring here to vBulletin, not the site implementation.
Tejas Mk1 is an advance on MiG-21. Rather than risking getting into a situation where Rafale/Tejas Mk2 is late and needing to extend the life of MiG-21 aircraft, why not double Tejas Mk1 production? It’s a cheap insurance policy.
I imagine that they are planning to transition the production line from one model to another. If Mk. 2 is delayed they can simply continue producing Mk. 1. No need to make additional order until there is indication that it is needed. Given that it is a domestic program extending production would be relatively straightforward.
It’s not silly if it’s based on an analysis of actual potential scenarios.
As stated India has clear threats unlike say the USA or UK. The capability of those threats is roughly known.
Hence it is possible to determine number of aircraft required to meet operational requirements.
But nothing remains static: capabilities of aircraft, fleet composition, threat scenarios and capabilities. Indeed, the more precisely the 39.5 squadron figure was first arrived at the more rapid the divergence from reality. And I don’t know when it was first arrived at, but I don’t think it was particularly recently. And whilst I agree that quantity matters, the other extreme — as represented by hammering the 39.5 squadron figure — which would propose to equate 1 MiG-21 with 1 Su-30MKI is even less credible. If 39.5 squadrons is indeed a hard figure that simply must be met, it follows that India should abandon heavy fighters and buy cheaper aircraft in greater numbers until the 39.5 squadron figure is restored.
Remember India’s concerns are potential high intensity conventional wars with neighbouring countries, and generally not far away low insurgency conflict.
Yep … the low insurgency conflict is close by, within state borders even. :p
Just about every major defense program suffers delays. So, the F-35 is hardly breaking new ground. Plus, the F-35 is not just one aircraft but three. Nonetheless, it is late and that does impact the F-15 length of service.
I don’t blame LM for problems with the F-35 program, I blame the broken institutions — military and political — that produced such a program.
The lack of realism continues today. It is obvious that F-16s and other aircraft are not going to be replaced 1:1 by F-35, so the smart move in this era of austerity would be to start retiring aircraft and associated personnel now rather than spending even more money on upgrades and life extension programs.
Sticking to some arbitrary figure such as 37.5 squadrons (.5 wtf?) is silly, but it’s interesting to consider that India is one of the few nations that can afford to do it at all given relatively inexpensive labour and enormous growth expected over the coming decades.
F-15C/Ds are being upgraded because F-35 is late and F-22 production was stopped in anticipation of F-35. If it weren’t for the failings and broken promises of the F-35 program there’d be no need for the C/Ds to soldier on till 2030.
In the event that F-5 replacement program falls apart, further upgrades to F/A-18 could smooth things over in Switzerland.
In Stephen Baxter’s novel Flood, in which the entire planet is drowned beneath rising waters over the course of several decades, there is at one point in the late 2030s described a flyover by an ‘ancient’ F-15 Eagle of vast refugee populations migrating across Texas. The continued service of the F-15 in this era, it is implied, is part of the general apocalyptic scenario of a civilisation that is slowly breaking down.
And yet back in reality, 2013, it now seems entirely plausible that F-15s could indeed still be around in the late 2030s. No apocalyptic scenarios needed, only the F-35 program. :diablo:
At least it should be larger than B-2: 100,000lb dry thrust vs. 60,000lb.
Yak-130@ LII
http://russianplanes.net/images/to105000/104146.jpg
Why do Yak 130s always seem to be armed, and with AAMs in this case! I thought Russia had turned away from notion of using Yak 130 as anything but trainer aircraft?
So did i miss something?
PAK-DA is pretty much subsonic flying wing.??? Reinvention of B-2 in 2013?
http://en.rian.ru/military_news/2013…Commander.html
I refuse to believe this.
This was rumoured some time ago. Is a bit disappointing from enthusiast perspective, but if it’s good enough for the Americans with NGB/LRS-B…
I hope China’s bomber doesn’t turn out to be yet another flying wing. Coupled with all UCAVs looking alike it really will be time to find a new interest. Gardening, perhaps. :p