dark light

Rii

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,041 through 2,055 (of 3,311 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ARE the US Navy's super carriers a relic of wars past? #2002799
    Rii
    Participant

    That is depending on the economic development – in USA the economy was growing very slowly the last decades (since the 1970s), debts are accumulating and the balance of trade is very negative, i.e. the USA are heavily indebted to other countries (e.g. Japan, China, EU). In contrast China is growing fast and has a positive balance of trade.

    But still: today the US spend more then all (or most) of the other countries combined. In the near future it is likely that the US have to reduce their spending on its military.

    I agree that economic growth sets the baseline. It is almost certain that China will outstrip American defence spending at some point as its economic base will be significantly larger. But over shorter time scales domestic policies can move to reinforce or oppose the long-term trends. Some of the factors I think will be at work:

    United States
    — downward pressure on military spending over next decade
    — return of Republican hawks to power in 2020s.
    — increasing military spending thereafter as United States begins to feel its #1 position threatened,
    — this will in turn force the much-delayed showdown between competing visions of American society: empire, taxation, welfare state. Could get very ugly. Emergence of fascism a distant but real possibility.

    China
    — next decade will continue existing trend of economic growth with military budgets proceeding apace.
    — thereafter balance will become more delicate as the ‘easy’ wells for large-scale increases in domestic prosperity begin to run dry. As population ages and economic growth slows, government will face pressure for increased domestic spending.
    — at the same time, China’s newfound strength will expand its attentions to global horizon, whilst need to confront many simultaneous threats (US, Japan, India, Korea, etc.) will ensure that pressure to maintain defence spending remains high also.
    — prognosis for increasingly delicate balancing act, but more of a slow pressure cooker scenario compared to relatively sharp inflection point for US.

    Can expect both nations to make extensive use of nationalist propaganda in refocus attention of their citizens from domestic issues to more palatable directions.

    So yes. China could potentially overtake American military spending by late 2020s, but in practice I think this is likely to be delayed until perhaps late 2030s, largely on account of increased American military spending amidst reactionary political environment attempting to ‘hold the line’ for liberty and Apple Pie and so forth. If world fails to end (i.e. major conflict, revolutions in either nation, etc.) hysteria will subside and American society and America-China relationship will find new equilibrium by 2040. China I think is unlikely to embark either on crazy spending spree or Euro-style minimalism.

    in reply to: Taranis to be tested in Australia #2240099
    Rii
    Participant

    “Intercontinental” is so vague a term as to be meaningless.

    in reply to: Taranis to be tested in Australia #2240135
    Rii
    Participant

    So much nonsense in that article. But it’s nice to know that Australia’s proud history as British and American dumping ground continues unabated.

    in reply to: ARE the US Navy's super carriers a relic of wars past? #2002823
    Rii
    Participant

    But you have to consider that today there is no country in world which spends anything remotely similar to the amounts the USA spends for its military.

    China’s military spending could overtake United States’ by late 2020s, a mere fifteen years from now. I don’t think it actually will, largely because the United States won’t allow it, but certainly outlays will be comparable in a way that they never were during the Cold War.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2240211
    Rii
    Participant

    j20 has many secrecy in it but we know some thing.
    we know j20 will use klj5 aesa radar
    we know j20 will use ws15 engine
    we know j20 has eodas
    we know j20 has sduck
    we know j20 will use irst since it has a slot. but j20 irst is built in not external like pakfa

    very cool.

    Can’t believe you forgot DSI. 🙁

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2240215
    Rii
    Participant

    FLOGGA

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2240409
    Rii
    Participant

    JH-7A

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2240436
    Rii
    Participant

    Very interesting, thanks!

    On a related note, is there any indication that China is thinking of overseas basing? Pacific Islands, Africa…?

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2240550
    Rii
    Participant

    Underrated aircraft I think.

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2240559
    Rii
    Participant

    What role for SSKs and SSNs in long-term Chinese planning?

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2240784
    Rii
    Participant

    It seems to me that LMFS is the most probable post-PAK FA project.

    LMFS could be powered either by same AL41 engine as PAK FA and PAK DA or by new generation smaller engine in RD33 class. If the former, this would cut down on development costs considerably. If the latter, the new engine would be useful in other applications such as UCAVs and possible Su-25 successor.

    In addition to replacing Fulcrums, if Russia has decided to press on with new carriers then new carrier aircraft will be required at some point to replace MiG-29K. And being more affordable than PAK FA it would have better long-term export prospects.

    in reply to: ARE the US Navy's super carriers a relic of wars past? #2002903
    Rii
    Participant

    So if 50-60,000 tons is the sweet spot, about the size of the QE2, Kuznetsov etc how does the USN go about defeating these carriers at sea?

    ISR cueing subs and land-based strike, just like everyone else. :p

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2240809
    Rii
    Participant

    According to paralay it is deep modernisation of Su-25, incl. new engine.

    EDIT: discussed here towards bottom of page, and next.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2240855
    Rii
    Participant

    Oh please, just as the U.S. has their black projects, I have little doubt that the Russians also have theirs.

    I don’t doubt that Russia has capacity to create a true MiG-31 successor. But if we are to believe all we are told, Russia is developing —

    — PAK FA
    — PAK DA
    — PAK Sha
    — LMFS
    — and now MiG-31 replacement

    In addition to having to catch up on unmanned systems development. It is too much.

    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2241667
    Rii
    Participant

    Pakistan.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,041 through 2,055 (of 3,311 total)