dark light

Rii

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,521 through 2,535 (of 3,311 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2246087
    Rii
    Participant

    He is a wannabie at least.

    Like Stalin? :diablo:

    Actually I am often impressed by the breadth of JSR‘s ‘sphere of engagement’, however one-sided its application. It’s like watching one of those fight scenes where everything that isn’t nailed down becomes a weapon to be hurled across the room — knives, plates, chairs, supercomputers… :p

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2246167
    Rii
    Participant

    I think Typhoon has the least chance of the candidates listed.

    Gripen = cheap and cheerful, lease option
    Rafale = beat Typhoon in India on cost, bearing in mind “where India leads, Malaysia follows”.
    Super Hornet = American backing, diplomatic-strategic choice
    Typhoon = ???

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2246608
    Rii
    Participant

    Yes, another intriguing possibility. It would seem to be incompatible with the notion of a ‘hybrid’ EPE/EDE configuration too. In any case, I’m sure we will find out eventually.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2246614
    Rii
    Participant

    Wasn’t there something a while back about SAAB being interested in a hybrid of the EPE/EDE configurations offering ‘only’ an additional 10% thrust over the baseline F414, i.e. ~24,000lb?

    in reply to: Indian CVF? #2006257
    Rii
    Participant

    All true but what will France do for a second Carrier??? Maybe go back to the CVF at some point?

    I think we’ll see a joint French-Brazilian carrier program in the 2020s.

    in reply to: Iran to Unveil New Fighter Tomorrow – Qaher 313 ??? #2247139
    Rii
    Participant

    Watch for a possible deal related to targetting pods also.

    I don’t see the wisdom in Russia courting Israel over Iran. Israel is (1) already beholden to the United States and (2) strategically insignificant, whereas Iran is one of the few countries able to oppose the American axis of power in the Middle East, esp. what with Syria now falling to bits.

    in reply to: Iran to Unveil New Fighter Tomorrow – Qaher 313 ??? #2247234
    Rii
    Participant

    The Russians won’t sell them any engines.

    What’s up with that? Why isn’t Russia pushing gear at Iran?

    in reply to: Kaveri Engine is a non starter for LCA #2248405
    Rii
    Participant

    Nope, far from it.
    http://defense-update.com/20130104_kaveri_tender.html

    The real question is just how much of the development time and money invested over the decades thus far will be evident in this foreign-assisted ‘Son of Kaveri’ 15 years from now.

    My guess is that Snecma was pushing for something like 0% of existing design work to be retained and any deviation from that from other prospective bidders will be solely to salve India’s ego at the expense of time, cost, and performance.

    in reply to: Indian AMCA and Korean KFX #2248527
    Rii
    Participant

    Regardless of where AMCA is at relative to KF-X right now, I’d put money on the Koreans reaching IOC first.

    Another issue is the politics. A multinational fighter project works the best when there is a lead country to pull the project forward. Having a bunch of nations with “equal” stakes drags the project down in politics.

    +1 to this as well.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2248629
    Rii
    Participant

    China’s Future Bomber Requirements Murky

    A lot of nonsense in that article, but I think this takes the cake:

    Dean Cheng, a China specialist at the Heritage Foundation, said that another reason the Tu-22M3 would be of little interest to China is that the JH-7 fighter-bomber has characteristics and payload comparable to the Tu-22M3

    in reply to: NATO v equally equipped opponent #2250567
    Rii
    Participant

    The Americans view India as a potential ally in the Asian theater against a rising China and would do everything to stop India’s speedy collapse apart from directly involving in the conflict.

    For the moment, sure. Give it another thirty years, though, and America will be looking around for allies to contain a rising India. Playing China and India off against one another is an obvious move.

    It’s the same in Europe. In NATO the United States has allies that are useful, but non-threatening. They can be pushed around, or ignored. The one thing the United States does not want is the emergence of a united Europe (or South America, come to that) able to threaten American hegemony. America subsidises the defence of the European continent precisely to ensure that it remains weak and fragmented, much as Britain did before it.

    in reply to: NATO v equally equipped opponent #2250573
    Rii
    Participant

    Why would America want Pakistan to stay out of it? Only reason I can think of is if India would be defeated too quickly under the combined onslaught.

    Remember, we’re talking about the two greatest threats to America’s global primacy. There’s plenty of ‘national security’-type folk who’d love to see India and China tear each other to bits, the more comprehensively the better.

    in reply to: NATO v equally equipped opponent #2250711
    Rii
    Participant

    NATO wouldn’t get involved against an adversary that could seriously threaten it. Sending a few unfortunate souls off to bum****istan to placate the United States as it pays for your defence is one thing, actually putting the state on the line is quite another.

    in reply to: F35 debate thread- enter at your own risk. #2250755
    Rii
    Participant

    Fair point to an extent and i agree with the sentiment. Only problem being is there are generally people who are happy to take advantage of a nation with no or reduced military capability.

    You could cut US military expenditure by at least one-third (and probably more) without compromising national security. F-35B and -C would be on the chopping block, -A would survive at reduced numbers.

    in reply to: F35 debate thread- enter at your own risk. #2251026
    Rii
    Participant

    Nobodies hoping the USA is going to slash defence budgets

    Anyone concerned for the health of the nation and the welfare of its citizens is hoping for significant reductions in military expenditure.

    Needless to say, this excludes virtually the entire governmental and political apparatus. C’est la vie.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,521 through 2,535 (of 3,311 total)