dark light

Rii

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,061 through 3,075 (of 3,311 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News From Around The World – VII #2358913
    Rii
    Participant

    Dustin Hoffman called the C-130 (from memory) in Outbreak a bomber. Hollywood precedent!

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2359067
    Rii
    Participant

    Well part of the cost is due to the low rate of production which in turn is part and parcel of the Japanese desire to keep the industry ticking over with limited demand and will also be the case with whichever aircraft is chosen here. That’s why I don’t think price is as significant factor in this competition as in, say, India: they know they’re going to be paying through the nose one way or another and have demonstrated the willingness to do so in order to maintain and develop domestic capacities. And remember: they wanted the F-22!

    in reply to: Argentina joining KC-390 program! #2359084
    Rii
    Participant

    Very well put. For the past 8 years, we’ve had the lowest military spending in our history. It currently is in the order of 0.6% GDP, and will be “upgraded” to 0.65% GDP in 2011, or ~U$D 3.800 M

    Damn, that must be about the lowest level of any nation of note. Even Japan is around 0.9%. I’m generally supportive of reduced military budgets, but evidently Argentina’s current level is not enough to sustain the basic skillsets and capacities that – unfortunately – should be maintained by any nation-state with the resources to do so.

    Hopefully you guys can find a happy medium soon.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2359099
    Rii
    Participant

    If time is their considerations, also improving their Aerospaces Industrial based, I still don’t understand why Japan did not considered this (F-2 or Super F-2) options.

    Occam’s Razor: they’re not happy with it.

    AFAIK Japan originally intended the F-2 to be a far more extensive modification of the F-16 than it ended up being. Maybe the terms with LockMart didn’t allow for it? That would explain their behaviour here.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2359430
    Rii
    Participant

    Looks like a promising shot for the measuring stick crowd.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2359631
    Rii
    Participant

    Err I’m not sure about the dimensions of the WS-15, but it definitely won’t be smaller than the current “WS-1X” on the J-20 prototypes.

    Per your pic there does appear to be room to house a slightly larger engine.

    If it’s true that China is working on a single-engine 5th-gen aircraft then it would lend credence to the rumours of a larger engine ala F135 for JSF.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2359670
    Rii
    Participant

    What would constitute a “scary” engine on a fighter out of interest?

    From the RuAF thread:

    http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5605/wait4me90.5e/0_57fc1_db43d6b4_XXL.jpg

    😎

    In any case wasn’t there some rumour that the final engines for J-20 are going to be larger than those currently fitted?

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2359693
    Rii
    Participant

    Gonna be a big radar in there.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2360289
    Rii
    Participant

    Rii, are you a secret member of ABJ?

    I’d say I have a healthy skepticism of the program but not to that level.

    I just think it’s absurd to talk about the F-35 carrying external loads. Are we really going to see F-35s on CAP with 10 AMRAAMs? I expect the F-35’s external stations will see more use than the B-1’s – in places like Afghanistan or Libya where the F-35 isn’t needed in the first place – but not that much more.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2360349
    Rii
    Participant

    Not really. I don’t the plan ever was to use its stealth onevery mission.

    No… just every mission that a new-build -16/18 couldn’t have done as well and cheaper.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2360395
    Rii
    Participant

    Possibly because the entire case for the F-35 goes out the window if the plan is to hang weapons off of it on a regular basis. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: First Tiger deployment: Aussie Tiger to Afghanistan #2360499
    Rii
    Participant

    Why then is there a lack of money at unit level?
    (trying to remain on the military side of things)

    As per the 2009 Defence White Paper the funding model is changing so as to fund the ADF at 1.8% of GDP through 2030. No doubt the ADF would prefer 2.0% or even higher, but the benefits of a stable, predictable level of funding should be obvious.

    A complicating factor is that the ADF is currently in the midst of an austerity drive, banking funds now (total of ~$3.5bn from 2010-2015) to spend on the F-35 in future.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2360510
    Rii
    Participant

    It is Miniature Detonating Cord (MDC) – an explosive cord designed to shatter the glass before the ejection seat fires (and the rotors are blown off in the case of the Ka-50/52).

    In order to speed up the ejection sequence on modern jets, the ejection seat usually fires directly through the cockpit canopy – that’s why the seats have projecting ‘horns’ on the head box.

    On some aircraft, the canopy glass is strengthened to withstand birdstrikes – so the MDC is fitted to shatter the canopy before ejection.

    It all saves vital microseconds.

    Ken

    PS – The Ka-50/52 helicopters are unique in having an ejection seat for the crew – the Zvezda K-37.

    Great info, thanks!

    in reply to: First Tiger deployment: Aussie Tiger to Afghanistan #2360657
    Rii
    Participant

    Did Australia add for options that turned out to be complex to integrate?

    What do you think? 😉

    Then we all wonder why we are taxed to the hilt, the government is broke and why the rich get richer….

    The government isn’t broke. Australia has the lowest level of public debt of any advanced nation by a significant margin. I’ve no issue with attention being paid to fiscal sustainability as I’d like that to remain the case, but we should keep things in perspective.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2360695
    Rii
    Participant

    Good posts, AD and Madrat…

    But I guess I’m in the camp of thought with those questioning why no F-15J+ follow-on block candidacy included here?

    ATD-X is Japan’s future heavy fighter. I expect they’re looking to transition from the current 30/50/20 F-4/F-15/F-2 mix to an eventual 65/35 F-X/ATD-X mix at reduced total inventory numbers.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,061 through 3,075 (of 3,311 total)