Dilma Rousseff has been re-elected as President of Brazil.
I don’t know if it’s entirely in my head or what, but Chinese Flankers always strike me as appearing more elegant/delicate than Russian Flankers.
and then generally stumble back down whatever alley brought them here.
Whereas others seem to navigate by a kind of LM bat signal.
Well the better solution to your problem would be to learn how to read.
Indeed; if you remove the ‘colour’ from my post, the point is a simple one: every dollar that is invested in platforms optimised for loitering in permissive airspace and plinking PGMs at targets that can’t shoot back is a dollar less for platforms that can be usefully employed in even a medium-intensity combat environment.
The key thing people miss about the utility of the B-52, Atlantique, etc. is that these aircraft already exist, having been created and maintained for other purposes. The costs have already been sunk. Creating and inducting a new large aircraft platform specifically for that secondary or tertiary tasking is a whole different ballgame — one that nobody wants to play.
A bit like suggesting Gripen E was easily up to the task of wiping away F-35s. It’s strange that people who post about ‘butt hurt’ are always the ones with the sorest butts.
Nobody was talking about F-35 or Falklands conflict scenarios before you arrived and started ****ting up the thread with your aforementioned butthurt.
Why would one be ‘butt hurt’ over a victory?
That’s just it — here we are having a simple discussion about Argentina’s apparent plans to recapitalise its air force with Gripen E/F, and you come in chanting God Save The Queen and raving about F-35s. It’s childish and petulant.
:wub: via SDF
Is this the first time we have seen afterburners lit? Hot stuff in any case. :applause:
Their Flanker purchases have been painful to watch.
2 of a model here, 2 of a lightly different model there, 2 of yet another slightly different model, 2 of a 2-seater……you get the point.
Yes, although to be fair much of this was dictacted by circumstances out of Indonesia’s ability to control. Purchase of 16 Su-35s would strengthen the Flanker force to ~30 units of various types.
A Gripen purchase, inducting an entirely new platform, would make sense only with domestic industry involvement and as the first batch of a larger investment (+ hopefully roping in orders from other S. East Asian nations e.g. Thailand) and as such would give TNI-AU two major combat aircraft projects going forward: Gripen E/F + KF-X. In that situation, there would seem to be very little room for either additional Flanker purchases, or PAK FA acquisition, at least till 2030.
General Moeldoko, Chief of Indonesian Armed Forces, has indicated that Su-35 is the lead candidate to replace its F-5s:
Oct 7: Su-35 favorite? Indonesian Military Commander General Moeldoko tells Republika Online that they’re leaning toward the Su-35 as their F-5 replacement, with the JAS-39 in 2nd place and the F-16 a distant 3rd:
“Menurut dia, jet tempur buatan negeri Paman Sam itu sudah tidak layak pakai lantaran teknologinya sudah ketinggalan zaman…. “Untuk udara, ada pengajuan penggantian F-5. Sukhoi Su-35 menjadi pilihan pertama, Saab JAS 39 Gripen pilihan kedua, dan pesawat F-16 pilihan ketiga,”…”
Of course this is presumably only a military preference. With SAAB’s offer of “100% technology transfer” Gripen E/F could fare well under a more holistic analysis taking into account broader strategic goals of domestic industry development and regional engagement — although realisation of these objectives would likely involve a larger buy than the 16 aircraft currently contemplated.
In past I have supported Argentinian modernization and still do and feel they need at least 4 Frasser OPV-80 ships better transport helicopters and of course new interceptors just for starters but as I have have also said in the past most of all they need to change there thinking gripen or no gripen there is a lot of work to do before the air-force will be back to fighting force
Hi Tempest, I wasn’t referring to your contributions, more those along the lines of lukos. 🙂
I for one would be thrilled to see the UK pour more of its diminishing resources into imperial policing projects like a modified A330 at the expense of real combat platforms. It would represent a further step* along the road to complete dependence on the United States.
* The existing cost of the UK’s imperial burden can be seen in the fact that the RN has 19 surface combatants while Japan operates 44 on a lower defence budget. TANSTAAFL.
The combination of indignation, whining, and general butthurt exhibited by many of our British posters here is rather unbecoming, but certainly amusing.
Great shot from the rollout:

What about having Embraer integrate EL/L-8247/8 & EL/M-2052 as a temporary measure until the Gripen E/F MLU done with local developments 10 to 15 years down the road?
As an Argentina-only solution the cost of that integration would have to be borne entirely by Argentina — at least I don’t see any reason why Brazil or SAAB would be willing to cough up cash for it. It might be worth it, depending on the timelines and capabilities of indigenous systems in development. I guess Argentina will be in a better position to assess these things a few years down the track.