dark light

Rii

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 3,311 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2214516
    Rii
    Participant

    As for national development – well, Selex Galileo signed an MoU last year to co-operate with ATMOS on AESA technology, so maybe Brazil will be able one day to come up with a British-content-free radar good enough to replace the Raven (which will have improved by then) or its successor. But it won’t happen quickly.

    In Argentina’s case, the radar doesn’t have to be on par with Raven — it just has to get the job done. Argentine Gripens could make the transition earlier at v1.0a, while Gripens produced for Brazil at the same time are still being fitted with the standard Selex systems. IRST and parts of the EW suite could be omitted entirely for a first batch of Argentine Gripens, if necessary.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2214581
    Rii
    Participant

    What are you on about? It isn’t a choice for SAAB. It cannot – not will not, not may not, but CAN not – sell Gripen to Argentina, or permit Brazil to sell it to Argentina, without British permission, unless the British systems are replaced. The Brazilian know that, & knew it when they selected the aircraft. SAAB isn’t cosying up to London, it’s just obeying British (it operates here) Swedish, & Brazilian law. Selex won’t be able to pass on its components to SAAB & ATMOS, & SAAB to Embraer, without end-user certificates, & faking them is illegal in all the countries concerned.

    I was referring to mrmalaya‘s implication that SAAB would not be cooperative in allowing Anglo subsystems on Gripen to be replaced with indigenously-developed equivalents.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2214594
    Rii
    Participant

    It might not fit your view of the world Rii, but it is likely that the European allies will stick together on this and actually have some influence over Brasil and Argentina!

    Shock, horror….

    If SAAB wishes to jeapordise its position in the market of the world’s future fourth-largest economy, and by extension the broader South American market, and thereby jeapordise both its own Flygsystem 2030 project and indeed its very survival as an independent entity capable of producing high-end combat aircraft, in favour of cosying up to London, that is its own affair.

    The Argentine (and to a lesser extent, Brazilian) inclination towards western hardware is certainly useful for SAAB in limiting the competition it has to deal with, but this can’t be taken for granted. If SAAB stands in the way of Brazilian national development objectives, then it will eventually be discarded in favour of those who won’t. The French, Russians, Chinese, and even Americans will be glad to step in, to say nothing of Israel, Turkey, Korea, and India.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2214653
    Rii
    Participant

    This is a possibility, but it’s quite a long-term one. For example, Brazilian industry can (& does) make some perfectly good radars, including some built under licence from Thales & a small fighter radar for the AMX, but I think it isn’t yet at a level where it can start developing a radar able to replace the Raven.

    If you look at the timeline Buitreaux posted above, Brazil has at least until 2023 to make it happen, with assistance from SAAB. And if the indigenous systems aren’t ready by then … well, I’m sure Argentina can wait a couple more years.

    The basic point is that Brazil has ambitions to field an indigenous advanced combat aircraft: FX-2 is meant to be a beginning, not an end. As such, Brazil will have to acquire the expertise necessary to create AESA radars, IRST, etc. anyway. Given Argentina’s circumstances, and its own development objectives, a jointly funded program to indigenise the existing Gripen’s existing Anglo subsystems makes sense in that it serves the objectives of both nations, at a lower cost to each than pursuing them alone.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2214731
    Rii
    Participant

    When confronted with what appears to be a square peg and a round hole, the proper course of action is not to throw them both out of the pram, but rather to work out how they go together. And as it turns out, there is in fact a way to make sense of all this: namely, that Brazil is interested in developing indigenous counterparts of the existing radar, IRST, EW systems, etc. anyway — the better to both advance national industrial development objectives, and with the intention of fitting such systems to future batches of Brazilian aircraft. Argentina and Brazil will jointly fund the development of such systems because both nations will ultimately benefit from them.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2214932
    Rii
    Participant

    I second that. Although I didn’t quite see why the UK never got a second hand carrier from the US…

    First and foremost because they couldn’t afford to run it. Solutions that work for larger nations don’t reliably scale down to smaller ones. The US military benefits from economies of scale that other nations can only dream of (although China is getting there).

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2215093
    Rii
    Participant

    Great news.

    Does this imply any adjustment in terms of other purchases?

    Probably just an extra couple of squadrons to account for delays in various programs (MMRCA, LCA, FGFA, Super-30) + crashes since the last order, which although signed 2012 was first mooted in 2010.

    in reply to: Embraer KC-390 rolled out #2215096
    Rii
    Participant

    Looks good except for the ugly refueling probe.

    Also, good news about Argentina and Gripen E/F.

    in reply to: World Missiles News #1788398
    Rii
    Participant

    Thanks for the input guys.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2215300
    Rii
    Participant

    4’th Mi-38, and it is a looker imho:

    http://www.russianhelicopters.aero/ru/press/news/Mi-38_4th_prototype_1st_flight/

    :applause:

    She looks great.

    So will Mi-38 see military service or rather go straight from Mi-8 to a high-speed helicopter design?

    in reply to: World Missiles News #1788406
    Rii
    Participant

    India successfully test fires Nirbhay cruise missile

    Congratulations. Is the turbojet indigenous or Russian? From Janes:

    It is possible that the turbojet engine has been provided by a Russian company: in October 2006 it was announced that Russia had agreed to supply 200 NPO Saturn TRDD-50MT small turbojet engines to India, ostensibly for the Lakshya target drone programme.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2215699
    Rii
    Participant

    People who lie to Congress go to prison.

    Is that why James Clapper still has his job?

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2216154
    Rii
    Participant

    It all went downhill when Gripen started whispering that Rafale was fat and Rafale overheard and hit back, claiming that Gripen was a skinny bitch with no curves. The two haven’t been on speaking terms since.

    in reply to: Mi-8 4+ gen #2216163
    Rii
    Participant

    What the bloody hell is going on with Mi-38 anyway? At this rate it will be outdated (compared to upcoming high speed helicopter designs) before it is even inducted.

    in reply to: Fusion reactor powered aircraft #2216193
    Rii
    Participant

    You gotta feel for the fighter jock who gets a kill on a $50bn aircraft and still only gets one silhouette for his trouble.

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 3,311 total)