dark light

Flyinghawk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New stealthy VTOL aircraft- more efficient and much faster #2190161
    Flyinghawk
    Participant

    What? Power loading has nothing to do with duct, and duct does not privde a lift. Your “predictions” its hot air without you have some metrics; dimensions, weight. You say turbofan engine yet you talk about power loading, ie shaft power in kW for example…

    I can explain to you thoroughly if you just want to read the posts:

    Metrics: Size: diameter 18 m, weight 10.433 ton, fuselage area 78 m2, fan area 75 m2, height 2 m.

    Power: 2 turbofan engines pneumatically or mechanically coupled with the tip ring of the lift fan.

    Control: aerodynamic flight is controlled by the regular control surfaces, hover or transition attitude is controlled by the vectored jet.

    Yaw torque is eliminated by two counter rotating fans. Pitching and rolling torques are eliminated by vectored jet during transition.

    Power loading has a lot to do with the lift generated from duct. If you didn’t know this, you wouldn’t know ducted fan.

    in reply to: New stealthy VTOL aircraft- more efficient and much faster #2190882
    Flyinghawk
    Participant

    I don’t buy this claim.

    If you have read the three papers, you would not have these questions. A well designed ducted fan is much more efficient than a helicopter rotor at the same disc loading. The power loading may double because 2/3 of the lift come from the duct and only 1/3 comes directly from the fan thrust. The disc loading of 138.5kg/m2 comes from the double of the Apache with the maximum takeoff weight of 10.433 tons.
    In forward flight, the lift fan stop working and is closed by louvers. The aircraft is powered by two turbofan engines. The maximum cruise speed of 0.75 Ma is calculated on the aerodynamic drag prediction.
    The fan tip speed is only 88 m/s (0.25 Ma), and the fan blade tips are fixed and connected with the duct walls because it is tip-driven. So it is much more quiet than a helicopter.

    in reply to: New stealthy VTOL aircraft- more efficient and much faster #2192211
    Flyinghawk
    Participant

    It is easy to close the duct by louvers or diaphragm or aperture.

    in reply to: New stealthy VTOL aircraft- more efficient and much faster #2193026
    Flyinghawk
    Participant

    Here is the duct closed:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]249139[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]249140[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]249141[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]249142[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: New stealthy VTOL aircraft- more efficient and much faster #2195093
    Flyinghawk
    Participant

    Here is the latest paper:

    http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/3/4/35

    in reply to: New stealthy VTOL aircraft- more efficient and much faster #2195119
    Flyinghawk
    Participant

    The area of fuselage is 78 square meters, so the volume is much larger than helicopters.

    in reply to: New stealthy VTOL aircraft- more efficient and much faster #2195141
    Flyinghawk
    Participant

    The lift fan will stop working and be closed by louvers in cruise flight, so it is stealthy. The bottom of the vehicle will become a plate.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)