Nope.
The 787-8 is the launch model and many have been built, some for flight testing the others stored awaiting certification.
When you say ‘many have been built’ do you have any idea of numbers?
I was on detachment to Lista in Norway back in the 80’s and an American C-130 hit a Reindeer on landing. Took out most the undercarriage fairing on the left side.
Strangely we had Reindeer stew that night in the mess and there were plenty of jokes about still being able to see the paint on the lumps of meat!
As a tin basher I’m just wondering why it’s painted in primer. You don’t usually paint titanium, apart from the exterior colour if it’s outer skin/structure.
It’s not some sort of balloon gondola is it?
the mirage is probably far more maintainance friendly and cheaper to operate. I don’t think the Gr.4 or any IDS variant of the Tornado carried any nukes although it was capable of doing so.
now another more interesting one is Mirage 2000 series and variants versus the Viggen.
Gr1 certainly carried nukes. We used to practice prepping the aircraft often enough!
CF6 and RB211 were of modular design, where (N1) compressor first stage (the big fan) could be removed in the hangar. The rump was then of manageable bulk to fit the cube of CL-44D/707-320F/DC-8F.
If you take the LP fan off a RB211 it doesn’t make it any smaller as it sits inside the fan case.
You take the nose cowl off it to make it shorter though.
lancastermkx, that’s in a tank though. Fuels react completely differently in a tank when vapours are present to how they do in open air. They’re very different things, and the vapours are infinitely more explosive and dangerous than the liquid fuel itself.
A few years back before health and safety got to interfering with our fun we used to set fire to a large drip tray of jet fuel during our annual fire training.
The fuel itself is quite reluctant to burn, and if you pushed the burning rag into the fuel (on the end of a stick!) it would usually put it out.
However, if you hold the flame near the fuel to warm it up, it would eventually catch fire.
When it’s in a vapour form or a spray it’s a lot more volatile, hence you hear stories of people blowing up aircraft when working in wet tanks without a flame proof torch!
In my experience those who spend the longest in the classrooms don’t make the best mechanics/engineers.
It shouldn’t be about what the easiest route is, it’s all about the standard of the engineer at the end of it, and in my experience ( both military and civil) you can’t beat time on the tools.
The only reason the cowling was missing was because it had burnt through.
The whole point of a suppression system is to control the situation early enough to prevent this happening.However in the case of a major component failure that also allows crankcase oil to be torched by the exhaust the “normal” fuel off practice will not suffice to control the situation.It is only because there are relatively few instances of these incidents that the serious consequences are not highlighted.A military trainer will have a different design criteria compared to its civil counterpart and that is why a “bale out” is a real option in dire circumstances.I would think it quite reasonable to be able to provide yourself with some protection if the “approval” regulations were able to cope with this.Radials are great, but they are more prone to “throwing a pot” than other types (for reasons stated in other posts) therefore the consequence of this should be considered in their operation.
I would respectfully suggest you read the report again. The cowlings didn’t burn through (though there was a small patch on one of the corners burnt off), the report draws the conclusion that they became detached when one of the cylinders flew off after failure. In this instance the report concludes the fire started after the cylinder became detached and the manifolds broke mixing hot exhaust gases and the fuel rich inlet mixture.
Any installation with a “cowling” gives a supression agent a real chance of working to its best ability and when one sees how effective “monex” or a “halon” equivalent is it must be worth looking at as an option.
But in this instance half the cowling was missing, so the effectiveness of any fire suppression systems would have been severely compromised.
There are definitely no Lynx at Wattisham, just Apaches.
I’m pretty sure most of the Lynx are based at Dishforth.
A serial number on a data plate of some sort?? ;):D
Data plate special? They’re even doing that to containers now! 😀
What was he doing tooling around in the dark??
Do read the story again. It happened at 1900hrs and was “getting dark”. It’s still pretty much daylight at 7pm here in East Anglia.
TC were a commercial outfit….. and very sadly the wording of the interim report on the loss of the T-Bird did effectively put a question mark over TC’s Lightning SOP’s in particular, and the SA CAA withdrawl of their operators certificate for paid flights in March wasn’t going to do much to make the business sustainable….. 🙁
Nice to see someone with a slightly less than rose tinted view of TC. I agree with you, that interim report wasn’t exactly glowing! (no pun intended).
Nice video, lots of the usual suspects! Looks a bumpy strip there.