dark light

Mark L

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 3,714 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BA in Europe… #559349
    Mark L
    Participant

    Yeah i totally agree with you there BRITISH airways arent worthy of their name i dont think anymore since the plans like this make it more european and not one of our breeds anymore, they do all this for money money money because people are so greedy and don’t give a hint of the name of the product and what it represents, the name should be given to an airline that actually does uphold its name

    By who? British Airways is a brand name, it isn’t a product description.

    in reply to: Mis-spelt name on a flight booking… #559778
    Mark L
    Participant

    You will be fine. The only scenario I would envisage there being a tiny chance of a problem is if flying to Japan or the USA where there is Advanced Passenger Information that could cause problems.

    I’m assuming that you are not going to either of those places on this booking?

    I am however slightly interested why you a) Used Expedia at all and b) booked over the phone?

    I’d never do either in a million years! 😮

    in reply to: BA 777 Emergency Landing Short of Runway at LHR #560289
    Mark L
    Participant

    The whole affair has generated one hell of a lot of discussion across the internet – I don’t think Ive ever seen so much interest in one accident, and part of me is wondering why; London Heathrow? British Airways? The fact that the cause of the accident looks to be so interesting, with possible wide ranging consequences?

    I do find comments on some sites interesting though. A member on one forum complained about an ‘astonishing’ article on the BBC in which a passenger told the media that they had been treated badly after the accident.

    The poster suggested the passenger was being a ‘moron’ by expecting to have refreshments and to see counsellors (quoting the poster: “As if there’s a room down a terminal corridor somewhere at Heathrow with a rapid response crack team of counsellors and therapists twiddling their thumbs waiting for a big plane crash to give them something to do”) almost immediately after the accident.

    However, Emergency Orders detail just that. That is EXACTLY what is, or should be, provided for passengers. Emergency Orders state that a response from organisations and personnel who are trained to deal with bereavement ‘situations’ and distressed victims after accidents is given in within hours. Airports are capable of providing this sort of response in less than an hour, in some situations.

    I think part of the reason this has attracted so much attention is because the UK has got to be one of the largest sources of aviation enthusiasts and aviation professionals in the world. This certainly is reflected in the online makeup of supposedly global discussion boards such as this one, PPrune and Airliners.net all of which have massive British contingents. That the incident happened in the UK and to a flagship British airliner is only going to drive discussion to a peak.

    The guy who was ranting off about not having access to refreshments and counsellors was talking absolute b*llocks. I’ve spoken with several staff members involved in the ground handling and they devoted an entire BA Terraces (Business Class) Lounge to the passengers of the flight and the emergency plan was implemented near flawlessly.

    in reply to: BA 777 Emergency Landing Short of Runway at LHR #560972
    Mark L
    Participant

    I was under the impression it reopened the day afte the incident ? With aircraft using a link further up from the crash area… Could be wrong though… ?

    27L reopened just an hour or two after the accident.

    It won’t be open for landings again for a little while as all the approach lights will need replacing…

    in reply to: Loganair becomes FlyBe franchise #561695
    Mark L
    Participant

    Why are the Islanders not getting a paint job?

    James

    Because the inter-island flying that the Islanders carry out in the Orknies and around Shetland are not part of the FlyBe franchise agreement (nor have they been part of the BA franchise for some time either).

    in reply to: Will 'British Airways' rebrand as 'BA' #564318
    Mark L
    Participant

    I think that BA will always keep themselves known formally as British Airways. That gives them the flexibility to switch between both as the need requires.

    In terms of branding the aircraft and the signage in the airports I think that it will always remain British Airways too. Whilst in the UK most people can probably tell you that BA means British Airways (although by no means everybody would know that I’m sure) but it is how the brand is viewed abroad, especially in the USA that is important. BA isn’t so instantly recognised as British Airways abroad and so I think it would reduce marketing exposure rather than raise it if the name was shortened with no obvious explanation of what it stood for.

    in reply to: BA in Europe… #564532
    Mark L
    Participant

    Well airlines chase the yields. It may be worth sending a few flights a day to MAN etc from your home base, but that’s very different to establishing a base there. In addition, the opportunity cost of operating from MAN etc as opposed to other tried and tested airports is a deterrent.

    Bottom line is that other parts of the UK do not have the demand (read: wealth) that London does.

    That is arguably a governmental and societal failure, not something you could or should pin on BA.

    Nice to see you back mongu!

    in reply to: Loganair becomes FlyBe franchise #564718
    Mark L
    Participant

    Interestingly timed with the annoucement of the ‘air discount’ scheme extension….

    It would be nice to see Flybe nod to a traditional Loganair scheme for a wee while (yes I know it’s not good business Mark..:D )

    I dunno about that, Retrojets are all the rage these days. There’s good marketing capital to be had in painting a 195 and a Q400 in the old Loganair scheme I’m sure!

    in reply to: UA and NW in Dublin #564769
    Mark L
    Participant

    Whilst Northwest have been ramping up their international operations lately United are in the same situation as most American carriers these days in having a huge lack of capacity and being constrained on any expansion plans they might ideally wish for.

    in reply to: BA in Europe… #565237
    Mark L
    Participant

    Thank You PMN. I am Just Hoping Infact praying that LH can get some rocket up BMI’S a%”e and turn it around like they Did Swiss.

    Be careful what you wish for there. Very careful!

    in reply to: BA in Europe… #565494
    Mark L
    Participant

    BA are a private company.

    They make money for their shareholders by flying routes which are profitable.

    That is the end of the story. Anyone who thinks there is anything deeper than that does not understand 21st century business, let alone the aviation business.

    in reply to: G-INTL flies again! #565966
    Mark L
    Participant

    EC-KMR

    in reply to: G-INTL flies again! #566168
    Mark L
    Participant

    Its definately different!

    Was there another 747 possibly the same aircraft here,parked up at LHR for a long time with a similar registration around 2002?

    Yes indeed there was, G-GAFX I think was the other one?

    Edit: Yup just looked it up. Why do I have a photographic memory for insane pieces of information like this and yet can’t even put together a reasonable essay for uni? Grr… Guess who’s been up all night trying to meet today’s 5pm deadline! 😡

    in reply to: The international registration VT! #566187
    Mark L
    Participant

    Not correct, Post 5 is the official explanation.

    I’d be interested to see a source? With ICAO prefix’s the letters themselves don’t officially have to stand for anything. There is a certain logic to what they correspond to in a lot of cases but not all, its quite rare again for them to actualy stand for something quite specific like Viceroy’s Territory…

    in reply to: The international registration VT! #566194
    Mark L
    Participant

    So pardon my ignorance ..but what does the VH stand for in Australian registration

    Like VT for India it doesn’t really stand for anything.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 3,714 total)