dark light

Grim901

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 975 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Breaking news the RAFALE WON #2350051
    Grim901
    Participant

    I saw the news of this 2 days ago and have avoided this forum ever since to avoid this kind of dick waving. 2 minutes in this thread and I wish i’d stayed away.

    But I did have to laugh at the French not being happy despite winning….maybe they should pencil in a strike.

    in reply to: New RN interceptor missile #1794570
    Grim901
    Participant

    Why – so you think CVF should only have CIWS

    No, I doubt anyone wants it just to have CIWS, but that is the likelihood for the time being. The point is that it’ll have one of our shiny, top of the line T45’s playing goalie whenever it goes somewhere “a bit bangy”.

    in reply to: Scotland Air Force #2358493
    Grim901
    Participant

    Well I’m tryuing to be constructive by asking:

    1/What is Scotland’s current GNP ?

    2/How may it be affected by Scotish independance ?

    3/What would be the government budget in an independant Sctoland ?

    Also, I read somewhere (can’t remember where) that in case of independance, the Scottish defence policy / armed forces would be more akin to that of Norway. How would such a defence policy apply to Scotland ?

    I feel bad talking about this in a military aviation forum, but everyone else is and issues need addressing:

    1) Its hard to calculate the GDP of Scotland alone as it is part of the UK, how does income from the likes of RBS etc split between the borders?

    2) Even harder to tell and not answerable at this point as it will depend heavily on negotiations with the UK in issues like what % of national debt it would take and what the long term effect being separate from the UK in terms of resources/investment etc. No one can answer that so people on either side of the discussion take their preferred answers. As far as Salmond is concerned the moment Scotland is independent the whole world will drop investment in the UK for the nicer nation of Scotland and the better financial hub of Edinburgh over London. I doubt things will play the way the SNP have said at all.

    3) See above, linked to GDP, but Salmond strikes me as the type to go on a spending splurge to prove how much better independence is and then let the next administration deal with the real reality. Sounds a lot like Gordon Brown to me….

    in reply to: Scotland Air Force #2358673
    Grim901
    Participant

    1. Why not? If they are an independent country, they can apply their own duty per barrel of crude. Apply their tax up front for the unrefined product.

    2. Yep.

    3. Ha. What influence? Most of the world hate the English.

    4. Pardon? Why would they have no control over interest rates? Are you assuming they would stick with the pound?

    1) You mean like the tax the UK just implemented and the SNP kicked up a big fuss about saying it’d discourage the oil sector in Scotland?

    2) Thanks for that input, the world hates the English, just like the Scots do, and therefore we influence nothing. Ever.

    3) The Scots would either have to keep the Pound or join the Euro. So take your pick over who controls your interest rate, Cameron or Merkel.

    Lets face it the SNP always kicks up a massive fuss when the UK cuts Scottish based defence, but if an independent Scotland constitutes its own forces they’re going to lose a whole lot more. You really think all those British army units being moved to Ex-RAF bases in Scotland will stay to keep Salmond happy? Or the 10000 people supported by Faslane that Salmond wants gone? Will the UK really pay for ships built on the Clyde when there are English shipyards that haven’t decided the UK isnt worth the time?

    I’d almost support independence if only to see how long it takes for the Scots to realise they’re worse off alone, and their irrational hatred of us south of the border was the real reason they voted yes. Fortunately I think most people in Scotland are too sensible for that crap.

    in reply to: MMRCA news XI #2361955
    Grim901
    Participant
    in reply to: Knowing what we know now, what would you do different. #2027194
    Grim901
    Participant

    Well the MBDA Meteor issue was due to the fins being to large for internal carriage. Apparenty MBDA plan to remedy that with a clipped fin variant, external carriage presented no issue.

    As for ASRAAM that is a bit more bemusing, it’s designed to be compatible with any aircraft wired for Sidewinder. I wonder if it’s more to do with UK gov not wanting to pick up integration costs.

    Yes i’d heard that about the Meteor, it could only fit in the A2G slots, not the A2A.

    That was what was confusing me about ASRAAM, my thought was just that it hadn’t been integrated. The Aussies will need it integrated eventually as well wont they?

    in reply to: Knowing what we know now, what would you do different. #2027202
    Grim901
    Participant

    Can anyone provide some more information on an aspect of this report:

    http://bfbs.com/news/uk/new-f35-c-fighters-future-doubt-54264.html

    First mention I’ve seen of the F35C not being able to use ASRAAM missiles. I knew there was a problem with Meteor on F35B but I haven’t seen this at all.

    in reply to: A new role for fast air? #2364297
    Grim901
    Participant

    I don’t disagree with you, i’m just going on the noises that have been coming out of the US DoD and the MOD in recent months.

    The opinion seems to be that if you end up in long term COIN work, you’ve done something wrong. After the last decade can you really blame them?

    in reply to: A new role for fast air? #2364530
    Grim901
    Participant

    Lol, nice find.

    This is why I’m all for replacing part of the fast jet inventory of western air forces with UAVs:
    – they’re much better suited for most missions modern air forces fly, like Libya, Afghanistan, Somalia…
    – at a much lower price, $10 million (high class UAV) versus $50 million (low class fighter) per aircraft, $400 versus $4000 per flight hour, and a few million more for the fighter pilot’s training and safety (priceless).
    – but are also extremely useful domestically, for example police, border patrol, SAR, fire fighting, disaster response…

    And then they insist on buying the F-35 :eek:. You can have a dozen UAVs for the cost of just one of those.

    See what I don’t get is that right at the time that Western armies are saying they need to cut back on their COIN type roles and head back to being higher end forces (no one wants to get into another Iraq and Afghan scenario now), people still insist we should be buying cheaper air assets that fit the COIN work and not the high end stuff.

    It just strikes me like air forces are about 10 years behind armies in deciding what they need.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions VI #2364799
    Grim901
    Participant

    Does anyone know what is actually included in the Phase 1 upgrades as of yet?

    in reply to: Is the UK getting cold feet? #2367190
    Grim901
    Participant

    Can you provide a link on the tailhook issue. Seems a little odd that a naval fighter would be designed so it can’t land on a carrier. Have the American’s even noticed?

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2367958
    Grim901
    Participant

    Would there even be any point buying 8 fighters? How many aircraft does it take to maintain a QRA? How many could actually be used at any one time?

    in reply to: Currently planned weapons for intergration on the uk F-35c #2336750
    Grim901
    Participant

    I’d heard Meteor needed modification of its control surfaces to fit on the A2A internal hardpoints, was this just on the B version or will that need to happen for C as well?

    in reply to: RAF VC-10'S #2341070
    Grim901
    Participant

    Still alive and very much kicking, heavily deployed on air bridge and refuelling duties with 101 sqn at the mo, 12 aircraft in the fleet in total, so would think 8+ or so in use.
    ZD241 is in for a minor star next month.

    Hold up, I read in a parliamentary answer this week that no VC10’s have been used in the airbridge since January last year.

    Link here:

    http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2011/02/parliamentary-questions-and-answers-up-to-15-feb-2011/

    What are they actually up to?

    I know one is being used for A400M refuelling tests though.

    in reply to: Student pilots to be laid off. #2345188
    Grim901
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 975 total)