Dave,
Apart from mine there was a Vampire cockpit, a Canberra cockpit, and a complete Auster.
As Robert said, that was it.
The T2 from Leuchars didn’t appear 🙁
Ian.
I can now confirm that the Harrier will be there as the tractor didn’t drop it en route!
If DaveT is willing to post the 2 pics I sent him (seeing as I can never get it right), you will have a sneak preview.
Ian.
Depends on how well you can flap your arms!
(unless you are bringing a spare Pegasus with you)
Yes, of course, you can have a very close browse. The General Public are
not allowed into the cockpit but Forumites can be – if you promise
to watch out for the sharp edges. (I reserve the right to frisk you for screwdrivers and spanners though!!!!!)
Cheers.
Ian.
Thanks for that Dave!
The Harrier is being picked up tomorrow morning.
Any Forumites passing by at the Show please identify yourselves!!
Cheers,
Ian.
Thanks for the compliment Dave!
Pity about the typo on my e-mail address – these things happen – but
it should be possible to work out the proper address from my name!
Trouble is – is the ‘arrier a wreck or a relic?
Thanks to Ken (who?) for a very useful book.
Cheers,
Ian.
Thanks Mark.
Had a look at their site and it looks very applicable, but expensive!
But there probably isn’t anything much cheaper.
I agree with your sentiments, but there is a possibility of assistance for
other things connected with the display.
I suppose I have to equate spending £80 or so on insurance with what I get
out of it. Mind you, I assume I would get free entry plus entry for a helper,
so that would help a bit…………
Cheers,
Ian.
As the owner of the Harrier T2/T4 which has appeared on the forum (ad nauseum?), I am very happy to swap experiences, either here or on the ICC forum. Some first points to consider are:
Do you have the room?
Sited indoors or outdoors? – if outdoors, do you have understanding neighbours? – and would it be safe from low-life?
It is amazing (and gratifying) how much interest is generated from
the public. (and, if it is TOO big, the local Council).
Do you have the money? – apart from the initial cost, it can become an
obsession, soaking up all your spare cash.
Do you have the skills to work on it? – this includes an appreciation
of the health and safety aspects, ranging from the sheer weight of some
cockpits to the health effects of angle grinding and paint spraying .
Do you have suitable equipment to lift/move/hold it?
But despite all of the above potential problems, it sure beats the hell out
of a garden Gnome!!.
Cheers,
Ian.
What I meant to say was that the technology of that time actually made it easier to use a manned space craft than to attempt robotic control.
Yes the Harrier has a sort of VTOL computer but it requires quite a lot of pilot control. I know this because by pure coincidence I actully own 3/4 of a Harrier T4 which is sitting in my garden and which I am restoring!
Cheers,
Ian
I am a semi-retired Chartered Engineer who worked for a Research Council connected with Astronomy. I have done design projects on spacecraft components and because of my knowledge and experience, I am now hired to give public lectures on Astronomy several times a month.
Almost invariably, some one asks me to prove that the Moon landings were not a fake.
The first proof involves radio and Doppler shift. Without going into all of the technical details about moving transmitters and Doppler frequency changes, take it from me that the spacecraft signals COULD NOT be faked and MUST
have come from the Moon. Also, the robotic technology at the time was so crap it was easier to land men than to try to simulate signals moving about the surface of the Moon using robots. And if the capability existed to soft land robots on the Moon then it existed to land men.
The second proof involves optical corner cubes which were left on the moon for laser range-finding. Any amateur astronomer with a thousand or two pounds spare can easily rig up a laser and telescope and reflect a light beam off the corner cubes – so SOMEONE must have left them there!
The camera panning up in later missions was indeed remotely controlled from
Mission Control on the Earth – as any proper reading of the technical data will tell you.
All the photographic “artifacts” can easily be explained.
Why don’t all you conspiracy theorists apply Occam’s Razor?
……and don’t get me started on UFO’s!!!!
Sorry to be a downer but I do get annoyed at people who cannot be bothered to understand the technical details before claiming ridiculous theories.
Some time around the mid-seventies when I was a young sprog just learning to fly, the Turnhouse Flying Club hangar was situated on the south of the airfield (now Edinburgh Airport), next to the Ferranti Hangar. (Not the same security problems in those days, sigh…).
I was hanging about as usual, hoping for a free flight or even for just the chance to taxi a plane to get fuel, when a group of expensive limousines
drove up the the Ferranti hangar. Out popped a load of “suits” accompanied by several well-tanned gents in military uniforms copiously adorned with medals.
The Ferranti hangar doors opened and lo and behold a Harrier was tugged out.
The miltary gents backed off into the jangar and at a suitable distance (but only what seemed to be about 100 yards), the Harrier “lit up” and performed a superb demo.
It hovered, reversed, flew a couple of low circuits then landed vertically.
Needless to say, all of us in the clubhouse were agog!!!!
After it landed and the Pegasus spun down, the pilot de-planed and shook hands with the assorted multitude. After a short while, they all shot off in the limos and the Harrier was dragged back into the Ferranti hangar.
I assume that this must have been a sales demo, possibly either for the Spanish or the Indians.
Pity that these days, with security as it is now, we would probably have been turfed out of our hangar for the whole day!
As is was, it was an unforgettable experience, and probably subconciously was one of the reasons why I now have half a Harrier sitting in my garden!
Cheers,
Ian.
Jon01,
£1500 would get you a cockpit – a bare shell…………
(It MIGHT have a canopy!)
A MK9 ejection seat would cost circa £400, a throttle box circa £200, joystick £150. and instruments anywhere from £5 to £200 (each).
…. and interior panels are like gold!
Cheers,
Ian (who is slowly building up a T4)
The mention of an accident at a scrappy’s yard brings to mind the care one has to take when working on large cockpits. I made VERY sure that my Harrier was properly supported on 5 scaffold poles concreted into the ground
before I crawled up into the wheel bay. The thought of something approaching a ton and a half toppling over is somewhat sobering.
So, Ollie or Tim, please make sure that your handling equipment (and the floor) can easily take the weight of whatever you end up with.
Height is another problem. I (once) forgot that I hadn’t secured the rear ejector seat properly, climbed up to the rear cockpit, stood on the seat which tipped over, and almost shot out the other side of the cockpit
seven feet up.
And things are so heavy! When either canopy is open, I make sure I insert a safety pin to make sure the canopy cannot possibly fall closed.
I suppose the advice is – think (and think again) of all the possibilities before
doing any serious work.
Cheers,
Ian.
I got a headbox for a MK9 ejection seat plus a Harrier GR3
weapons control panel.
(Now I wonder where I am going to put those!)
Happy Christmas,
Ian.
The secret’s out! Bet you didn’t know the Pegasus used wooden struts!
And thanks to Steve for your vote of confidence.
Many thanks to Dave for posting my pictures (he is much better at it than I am!)
There is still some finishing off to be done round the edges (the weather has delayed play) but they both hinge nicely and both canopy latches actually work!
Note that the 3mm polycarbonate on the front canopy survived cutting, drilling and dropping without a complaint – MUCH better than acrylic.
The recommended minimum bend radius is approx 150 times the material thickness so 3mm gives 450 mm radius and it could probably go tighter.
Air intakes are next!!
Ian.